-If you say the Bible is false because "men" wrote it, then you shouldn't use another "bible" that was written by a man just 36 yrs ago as gospel?
- i don't use it as gospel i'm not a satanist, but it can be used as a reference for the religion considering it is the bible for the modern day religion.
-If you dismiss the Bible as false because there is no Scientific proof of it, why do you defend another "bible" that has even less proof?
- b/c it is not built upon gospel of GOD through man... it is the interpetation of a man, of a religion he is credited w/ starting
-If you contend the Bible is false because there are different versions of it, how come the Satanic bible, which is simply a collection of works from several different sources, any more credible?
-b/c it deals w/ real life, and is not made up of stories; but ideas.
-IF the Satanic bible that you are defending mentions Christ, Angels, and God.....wouldn't that serve as yet another "source" to prove they all do in fact exist?
-well i guess if you believe that then they are both ture

From your questioning i'm begining to believe you have never read the statanic bible as you previously stated "reading excerpts from that Satanic bible" b/c if you have you would know it is a book of ideas and rituals, it is not a story book on the life of LaVey and him praising satan.