Then what did you mean by " ^ where did you dig up that crock of shit generalization? ok, i'm not going to say everything you posted is false b/c that would be a dumb statement, but this again sounds like alot of christian blender full of agenda to make a case for something."Originally Posted by admin
Call me stupid if you want, but it's clear that you are at the very least calling SOME of the statements he makes FALSE right there. Are you not?
Well then, my statement still applies: What is it that makes ANY of his statements FALSE, propaganda, banter, wrong, stupid, etc and ALL of yours 100% accurate then?
I can't speak for him, but I believe he was trying to give you the "content" you kept asking for to prove once and for all that he does know a little something about the subject.and if you don't think those are generalizing statement then please explain to me how you know for infact that ALL statanist: lie, steal, murder, grave, rob, etc... he did post some good content, but to what point?
What do you call your statements about Christianity, unbiased and accurate? Right.As i stated in my last sentence which you obviously didn't read, there is quite an agenda behind what was written. I can obviously do the same about christisans or muslims i stated that already. So if we are going to base this discussion on Generalizations why don't we do this for every discussion?
You've said time and again, as have others too, that "Christians" do this and "Christians" do that.....never once uttering the words "some" or a "few" anywhere in those passages. So, I don't see how this is any different. We are talking about "Satanism" and "Satanists". So, it is your contention that we should suddenly be ultra specific and say, "Satanists that live at 1234 Main are this" and the one's at "2345 South street are that".... :jerkit:
Whatever.
You guys have been knocking the Bible, the church, and Christianity as a whole using very big generalizations. Go back and find 5 posts where you directly acknowledge that "some" churches do this or "some" Christians do that. You won't, because they're not there. So how come it's OK for you to generalize then and now when the shoe is on the other foot it's not?![]()
Again, it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black.You can't make a generalize statements and expect it to be taken as PROOF or TRUTHcom'on your not that dumb... now i highley doubt those were his words so as i said i would like see where that came from to see if it has any clout. It would be like me writing a book on how it is to grow up black
![]()
See above. Find those quotes where you guys have shown even an ounce of possibility that SOME churches or SOME Christians are good instead of the hypocrites, liars, thieves, and closed minded cattle you guys have been blasting we ALL are. Find them.
Until then, you have to deal with generalizations the same way we have.....one at at time. You have a difference in opinion about something he's saying, then debate that. Don't try and debate ALL he is saying with ONE statement of "that's too general". Isn't that what you were bitching at me about before? When I told you that "I believe" or "It's in the Bible"? You jumped up and down and said that was too vague and I wasn't backing up my statements with sources.......where's YOUR back up now?
Once again, good for the goose but not for the gander.