Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 161 to 200 of 204

Thread: Official bash civics thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    I am pretty sure Alfa stopped bringing cars into the US in the early 90's. Not 30+ years ago. But also has nothing to do with a civic.

    Lets all focus our hatred of civics onto paper. I know, I know, it is hard to do but thats what this thread was called for. And oh how I hate them.

  2. #2
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Still has nothing to do with a civic

  3. #3
    Might be unstable MskunkM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Duluth, Ga
    Age
    40
    Posts
    229
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    if civic drivers (not saying all are) weren't so god damn cocky about there cars no one would really bug them... but i drive a miata, and HATE street racing with a passion but ive put 2 of 3 civics in my rear view mirror because the driver wanted to be a show off and SUCKED @ driving his boosted, body kitted, neon under glow, riced out civic VS a practically bone stock slightly tuned 93 miata and a driver who knows what there doing = FAIL.
    i say all good guy civic owners and everyone els rally together to eradicate this insidious plague we call "rice"

    Zombie panda BACK IN BLUE

  4. #4
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    84
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MskunkM
    if civic drivers (not saying all are) weren't so god damn cocky about there cars no one would really bug them... but i drive a miata, and HATE street racing with a passion but ive put 2 of 3 civics in my rear view mirror because the driver wanted to be a show off and SUCKED @ driving his boosted, body kitted, neon under glow, riced out civic VS a practically bone stock slightly tuned 93 miata and a driver who knows what there doing = FAIL.
    i say all good guy civic owners and everyone els rally together to eradicate this insidious plague we call "rice"
    I agree with this. I believe that The Fast and the Furious Ruined an entire generation of otherwise decent car guys. That movie came out and the body kits and exhuast market exploded. Also, these same people took Speed Channel and turned that programming into an ignorant pile of Sh-it. Pinks, Nopi Tunervision, and Unique Whips are NOT what cars are supposed to be about. Big deal, you can park the nose of a car against a wall and ruin as set of front tires doing a burnout. The people who get their jollies from this are the same people who, on Pinks complain their Transmission or Clutch is bad, but still do a big smoky burnout before a pass. God I hate Sped, I mean Speed Channel...

  5. #5
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    ok so he's not talking about the sti, so the normal ones have 224. which is still way more then a 20 horsepower difference

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  6. #6
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    the normal impreza boxter engine that isnt turboes puts out, 170, which is right there with the SI's, so i dont know wtf he is talking about.

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  7. #7
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    the normal impreza boxter engine that isnt turboes puts out, 170, which is right there with the SI's, so i dont know wtf he is talking about.

    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..

  8. #8
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..
    at the flywheel = crap at the wheels...

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  9. #9
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    at the flywheel = crap at the wheels...
    Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!

  10. #10
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green91
    Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!
    And you apparently missed the part in my reply to JITB that said we are not talking stock cars here. Mainly because there is no reason to bash a stock civic. If someone put a turboback exhaust on the WRX and had it tuned it can see a 50 whp gain easily. But I am not here to defend the WRX. I am saying that riced out civics suck and there is nothing anyone can say to me to think otherwise, especially in a way where I have to decipher where periods have to be placed.

  11. #11
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    atl
    Age
    39
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.

  12. #12
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    59

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atlsrt44
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.

    yea yea, we know that... we dont want to get into that... But you know out of all, the wrx prob has the most drivetrain loss of all..


    But im not defending hondas, iver never owned one. But, im the type that has a problem with the way the tuner thing has changed. I liked it better when it was people taking ****ty cars and making them into great cars. Now its more of buying a great car, and making it great? Not to say that we all dont want nice cars. But alot of cars dont impress me too much, not because of what it is. But just because it doesnt suprise me when a evo makes 700 hp on 40lbs of boost... i mean dam what motor wont make 700hp on 40lbs...lol. Just some cars im numb to their capabilities, and it doesnt interest me at all. And alot of people rather tell someone to not waste money on the car they want, rather than give props. I challenge anyone to go and research about a car that they hate or cant stand to see people put money into, and see if u dont find something interesting about it.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,964
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atlsrt44
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.
    well looks like everyone else in here is not to defend there civics.. but you are here to defend the hp of your neon aintcha..

    well i've owned 3 civics, loved it, modified it, SOld Some, Bought Some more, a very on going side job, for gett'n that xtra $$$ and all the motors were making under 120, and took me places 4rom point A to B.. thats that.. and i do believe i'd riced the fucc out of one of them.. and @ that year.. i've sold it for about 9k and only spend like 4k in it .. ..
    Last edited by YouKnowIt; 04-23-2008 at 10:35 PM.
    /Oo ___A___ oO\
    |=_/_______\_=|



  14. #14
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowIt
    well looks like everyone else in here is not to defend there civics.. but you are here to defend the hp of your neon aintcha..
    Whoa whoa whoa. Now that is a whole different thread. No need for that in here.

  15. #15
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    atl
    Age
    39
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowIt
    well looks like everyone else in here is not to defend there civics.. but you are here to defend the hp of your neon aintcha..

    well i've owned 3 civics, loved it, modified it, SOld Some, Bought Some more, a very on going side job, for gett'n that xtra $$$ and all the motors were making under 120, and took me places 4rom point A to B.. thats that.. and i do believe i'd riced the fucc out of one of them.. and @ that year.. i've sold it for about 9k and only spend like 4k in it .. ..
    nah just pointing out that manufacturers claim very different hp #s and since the srt4 is the only one I'm familiar with It was my example

  16. #16
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    lol i dont know, im on there more... its smaller and i can keep up with all the forums easier, i have been on here for a long time. but only recently started posting again...

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  17. #17
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    I may have read this wrong but your grammer is also something to modify
    You really should not criticize my grammar if you are going to start a sentence with "and" and not using complete sentences. Oh yeah, grammar has 2 a's in it.

  18. #18
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    So basically your argument is that s/c are better because its more difficult to fully load a turbo on the dyno? I do agree that dyno rollers don't completely simulate real load conditions (and this is only if its a large turbo) but it is very close, close enough to where 99% of tuners can add a certain percentage of fuel and be extremely accurate, not to mention road testing afterward. So i think thats pretty much a null argument

  19. #19
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    37
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    36

    Default

    they use to underrate the hell out of engines,now they over rate them

    example, GM's LT4 was stated to make 330hp but really it made 430hp,but they didnt want to seem like they were downsizing when they went to the LS1

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!