Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
And you apparently missed the part in my reply to JITB that said we are not talking stock cars here. Mainly because there is no reason to bash a stock civic. If someone put a turboback exhaust on the WRX and had it tuned it can see a 50 whp gain easily. But I am not here to defend the WRX. I am saying that riced out civics suck and there is nothing anyone can say to me to think otherwise, especially in a way where I have to decipher where periods have to be placed.Originally Posted by green91
riced out anything sucks... ..But as easy as u can get 50hp out of the wrx, u can get power out of the others it would give similar results..Originally Posted by Footefan52
Like I said man, I am not here is defend the WRX or my car (barely a WRX anymore). I am here to give anyone hell that drives a riced out civic (or a riced out car in general). I am an equal opportunity haterOriginally Posted by JITB
![]()
Originally Posted by JITB
I know you aren't exactly a pro-honda guy, so im kinda surprised by your involvement in this thread, but i appreciate you being level headed unlike some of these guys. My point in this thread wasn't actually to bash hondas so much but to point out that a majority of people that make lame arguments against them often have the same short comings in their own vehicles that they boast