Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 161 to 200 of 204

Thread: Official bash civics thread

  1. #161
    drives a beat up 626 blackshine007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the overpass pissing on traffic
    Age
    44
    Posts
    2,961
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Aahhh. Ok. That's good enough. Reps, only because of my laziness.

    K series 626. That's right. It's got a K in it.

  2. #162
    Z and Fit Owner
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Griffin
    Age
    46
    Posts
    176
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RWD164
    Wasn't a market? Are you kidding? Alfa Romeo, Triumph, MG, , Fiat, Lancia, .
    And when were those sold last in the US? That is what my point was, and the quote i had. My fathers Triumph Tr-6 was a great sports car, but there havent been any sold, or most of those other companies, in the US for 30+ years because there was no market here for them. Muscle cars puched them out, then the fuel crisis and EPA regulations ect..

  3. #163
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    I am pretty sure Alfa stopped bringing cars into the US in the early 90's. Not 30+ years ago. But also has nothing to do with a civic.

    Lets all focus our hatred of civics onto paper. I know, I know, it is hard to do but thats what this thread was called for. And oh how I hate them.

  4. #164
    The Chinese Chicken! secondgencamaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Lawrenceville, GA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    776
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by japan4racing
    camaros, you name it and i guarantee a queer is messing it up for the rest of the guys.

    /thread

    Anybody seen the third gen Camaro parked to the couth of Buford Hwy with the bondo spoiler and taillights?

  5. #165
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Still has nothing to do with a civic

  6. #166
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    Doesn't seem like it. It would be better though due to being belt driven. Although I have seen a supercharged s2000. That would sound cooler too cause you could put a quiet exhaust on it and then only hear the whine of the charger
    yea my old tech at honda had a super charged civic putting out like 300 very nicely made horsepower... im thinking about putting a supercharger on my S. very reliable and easily can get into the 320 whp range...

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  7. #167
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    I know the stock test results and as someone that reequents the forums you should know that there are not that may stock WRXs around. With a simple exhaust swap and a tune they can net over a 50 whp gain. I am not saying that my car is the best car there is but in all reality it is misclassed. Also most of the mags. also test the wrx in with the evo. Would you class an evo with the rest of these cars?

    Edit: And also this thread was not really about stock civics and we all know that. There is nothing wrong with stock civics. Hell I would drive one cause they get 40 miles to the gallon and my car gets 18.

    they USED to test wrx's with evos, but after the years it was pointless....lol The sti is the evo's competition, and thats waht gets tested with the evos. The wrx gets tested with the fwd compacts. And a evo doesnt get classed with those cars, b/c its performs soo much better.

  8. #168
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    i mean if your not gonna respond with anything serious, other than silly/witty idiotic comebacks, than ur not worth responding.
    bingo!

    foote: you do realize that civic si & wrx are only about 20hp difference right.. stock for stock. the civic does it with a little higher compression and variable valve timing. wrx does it with nearly 14lbs of boost!

  9. #169
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    I may have read this wrong but your grammer is also something to modify
    and yes you did read something wrong, you only read the first half my sentence. this is what i said:

    IMO a wrx is hardly fast on its own. and more inline competition for the civic would be a corolla or sentra, which incidentally both have variants are are widely modified as well.

  10. #170
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RWD164
    Not True at all. Look up Judson Superchargers they make many superchargers for small bore motors. Or you could use a 2 Stage blower and they are quite efficient. Truth is, Superchargers are better for small engines. Period.
    im still going to disagree with you for the sheer fact that you are having a draw on the engine to produce power. a portion of the increased power from the blower is being forced to power itself. turbos utilize existing exhaust flow and thermal expansion but require no additional load to power itself. sure you can compare x to a ## whatever.

  11. #171
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green91
    bingo!

    foote: you do realize that civic si & wrx are only about 20hp difference right.. stock for stock. the civic does it with a little higher compression and variable valve timing. wrx does it with nearly 14lbs of boost!
    you must not be talking about an sti, and i thought normal wrx's didnt even have turboes.... and especially not that high of psi. sti's push out 300 hp nearly if not a little more( depends on the year i guess). and stock civic si's do 160-190 depending on the year, wat r u smoking?

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  12. #172
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    you must not be talking about an sti, and i thought normal wrx's didnt even have turboes.... and especially not that high of psi. sti's push out 300 hp nearly if not a little more( depends on the year i guess). and stock civic si's do 160-190 depending on the year, wat r u smoking?

    dammit it says WRX!!! AND WRXES DO HAVE TURBOES!!

  13. #173
    Might be unstable MskunkM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Duluth, Ga
    Age
    40
    Posts
    229
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    if civic drivers (not saying all are) weren't so god damn cocky about there cars no one would really bug them... but i drive a miata, and HATE street racing with a passion but ive put 2 of 3 civics in my rear view mirror because the driver wanted to be a show off and SUCKED @ driving his boosted, body kitted, neon under glow, riced out civic VS a practically bone stock slightly tuned 93 miata and a driver who knows what there doing = FAIL.
    i say all good guy civic owners and everyone els rally together to eradicate this insidious plague we call "rice"

    Zombie panda BACK IN BLUE

  14. #174
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    ok so he's not talking about the sti, so the normal ones have 224. which is still way more then a 20 horsepower difference

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  15. #175
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    the normal impreza boxter engine that isnt turboes puts out, 170, which is right there with the SI's, so i dont know wtf he is talking about.

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  16. #176
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    the normal impreza boxter engine that isnt turboes puts out, 170, which is right there with the SI's, so i dont know wtf he is talking about.

    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..

  17. #177
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..
    at the flywheel = crap at the wheels...

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  18. #178
    Senior Member | IA Veteran quickdodgeŽ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    In your soul
    Age
    55
    Posts
    71,805
    Rep Power
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HypnoToad
    muscle car is something like a charger SRT8 or Impala SS
    I disagree. They quit making true muscle cars around the early to mid 70s. Nothing in the 80s or above is a muscle car. Later, QD.
    FOR MORE INFO, CLICK THE PIC!!!


  19. #179
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
    I disagree. They quit making true muscle cars around the early to mid 70s. Nothing in the 80s or above is a muscle car. Later, QD.
    I normally dont like you... lol but I FULLY agree on that ****... muscles cars nowadays that are being made arent ****. They dont deserve that title.

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  20. #180
    Senior Member | IA Veteran quickdodgeŽ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    In your soul
    Age
    55
    Posts
    71,805
    Rep Power
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    I normally dont like you..
    What the fucc does this have to do with anything? I don't give a fucc who you like or dislike and if I'm one for you to dislike (for no apparent reason), so what? My comment(s) had nothing to do with you so stick to the topic. Later, QD.
    FOR MORE INFO, CLICK THE PIC!!!


  21. #181
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    at the flywheel = crap at the wheels...
    Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!

  22. #182
    IA LEGEND #truth Brett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    53
    Posts
    67,792
    Rep Power
    121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynasty_Four
    I normally dont like you... lol but I FULLY agree on that ****... muscles cars nowadays that are being made arent ****. They dont deserve that title.
    How is it in all these years on here you have only 500 posts but on the S2k forum in your first week you had well over 1,000? Thats what I wanna know...LOL.
    Brett (One of the true OG's, No really... ask anyone)
    '15 Chevy SS
    '16 K7 SXL SWP

    www.facebook.com/brett.lowenthal1

    R.I.P Leisa, You are never forgotten - 10/7/08

  23. #183
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    lol i dont know, im on there more... its smaller and i can keep up with all the forums easier, i have been on here for a long time. but only recently started posting again...

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  24. #184
    AP2 FTW Zeeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,809
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brett
    How is it in all these years on here you have only 500 posts but on the S2k forum in your first week you had well over 1,000? Thats what I wanna know...LOL.
    since u have massive crazy rep send me like 1000 points

    StudioZDesigns
    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal75
    Topdown for miles make vertical smiles.

  25. #185
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green91
    Okay but civic si, 198hp crank, wrx = 224.. 26 hp difference. but then youe gotta consider AWD driveline loss!
    And you apparently missed the part in my reply to JITB that said we are not talking stock cars here. Mainly because there is no reason to bash a stock civic. If someone put a turboback exhaust on the WRX and had it tuned it can see a 50 whp gain easily. But I am not here to defend the WRX. I am saying that riced out civics suck and there is nothing anyone can say to me to think otherwise, especially in a way where I have to decipher where periods have to be placed.

  26. #186
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    I may have read this wrong but your grammer is also something to modify
    You really should not criticize my grammar if you are going to start a sentence with "and" and not using complete sentences. Oh yeah, grammar has 2 a's in it.

  27. #187
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    And you apparently missed the part in my reply to JITB that said we are not talking stock cars here. Mainly because there is no reason to bash a stock civic. If someone put a turboback exhaust on the WRX and had it tuned it can see a 50 whp gain easily. But I am not here to defend the WRX. I am saying that riced out civics suck and there is nothing anyone can say to me to think otherwise, especially in a way where I have to decipher where periods have to be placed.
    riced out anything sucks... ..But as easy as u can get 50hp out of the wrx, u can get power out of the others it would give similar results..

  28. #188
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    84
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MskunkM
    if civic drivers (not saying all are) weren't so god damn cocky about there cars no one would really bug them... but i drive a miata, and HATE street racing with a passion but ive put 2 of 3 civics in my rear view mirror because the driver wanted to be a show off and SUCKED @ driving his boosted, body kitted, neon under glow, riced out civic VS a practically bone stock slightly tuned 93 miata and a driver who knows what there doing = FAIL.
    i say all good guy civic owners and everyone els rally together to eradicate this insidious plague we call "rice"
    I agree with this. I believe that The Fast and the Furious Ruined an entire generation of otherwise decent car guys. That movie came out and the body kits and exhuast market exploded. Also, these same people took Speed Channel and turned that programming into an ignorant pile of Sh-it. Pinks, Nopi Tunervision, and Unique Whips are NOT what cars are supposed to be about. Big deal, you can park the nose of a car against a wall and ruin as set of front tires doing a burnout. The people who get their jollies from this are the same people who, on Pinks complain their Transmission or Clutch is bad, but still do a big smoky burnout before a pass. God I hate Sped, I mean Speed Channel...

  29. #189
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    riced out anything sucks... ..But as easy as u can get 50hp out of the wrx, u can get power out of the others it would give similar results..
    Like I said man, I am not here is defend the WRX or my car (barely a WRX anymore). I am here to give anyone hell that drives a riced out civic (or a riced out car in general). I am an equal opportunity hater

  30. #190
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    riced out anything sucks... ..But as easy as u can get 50hp out of the wrx, u can get power out of the others it would give similar results..

    I know you aren't exactly a pro-honda guy, so im kinda surprised by your involvement in this thread, but i appreciate you being level headed unlike some of these guys. My point in this thread wasn't actually to bash hondas so much but to point out that a majority of people that make lame arguments against them often have the same short comings in their own vehicles that they boast

  31. #191
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    atl
    Age
    39
    Posts
    254
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JITB
    si is rated at 198hp at the flywheel
    ms3 - 263hp
    gti - 200hp
    srt4 - 230hp
    wrx - 224hp
    rsx - 200hp

    all around the same..
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.

  32. #192
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    84
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green91
    im still going to disagree with you for the sheer fact that you are having a draw on the engine to produce power. a portion of the increased power from the blower is being forced to power itself. turbos utilize existing exhaust flow and thermal expansion but require no additional load to power itself. sure you can compare x to a ## whatever.
    Fair Point, but small bore motors (Under 2.5L) tend to be a bit laggy with any real boost/big turbo. Sure a small turbo on a small motor is Ok, but a small supercharger will give power from nearly idle to the redline, where turbos need to spool and the less exhaust (small bore) the longer the spool time, the more lag. I am simply wondering why people do not supercharge more, I am not here to nit pick the finite details of forced induction. You want that arguement, create an new thread...

  33. #193
    Senior Member | IA Veteran  OneSlow5pt0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Buslengths behind you
    Age
    36
    Posts
    13,406
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quickdodgeŽ
    I disagree. They quit making true muscle cars around the early to mid 70s. Nothing in the 80s or above is a muscle car. Later, QD.
    true,but those cars are way more of a muscle car then a vette or viper and so forth.

    so their not the muscle cars of yester year,but its the closet thing we got now

  34. #194
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RWD164
    Fair Point, but small bore motors (Under 2.5L) tend to be a bit laggy with any real boost/big turbo. Sure a small turbo on a small motor is Ok, but a small supercharger will give power from nearly idle to the redline, where turbos need to spool and the less exhaust (small bore) the longer the spool time, the more lag. I am simply wondering why people do not supercharge more, I am not here to nit pick the finite details of forced induction. You want that arguement, create an new thread...
    The power that is "drained" from a supercharger is negligible. It is the same as running the air conditioning. When tuning a car it is important to run the car at maximum load to accomplish the optimal fuel maps. Therefor if your running a supercharger then it is getting the most smooth fuel map, which makes for bigger gains.

  35. #195
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atlsrt44
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.

    yea yea, we know that... we dont want to get into that... But you know out of all, the wrx prob has the most drivetrain loss of all..


    But im not defending hondas, iver never owned one. But, im the type that has a problem with the way the tuner thing has changed. I liked it better when it was people taking ****ty cars and making them into great cars. Now its more of buying a great car, and making it great? Not to say that we all dont want nice cars. But alot of cars dont impress me too much, not because of what it is. But just because it doesnt suprise me when a evo makes 700 hp on 40lbs of boost... i mean dam what motor wont make 700hp on 40lbs...lol. Just some cars im numb to their capabilities, and it doesnt interest me at all. And alot of people rather tell someone to not waste money on the car they want, rather than give props. I challenge anyone to go and research about a car that they hate or cant stand to see people put money into, and see if u dont find something interesting about it.

  36. #196
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    The power that is "drained" from a supercharger is negligible. It is the same as running the air conditioning. When tuning a car it is important to run the car at maximum load to accomplish the optimal fuel maps. Therefor if your running a supercharger then it is getting the most smooth fuel map, which makes for bigger gains.
    Wow i don't even know where to start with this statement. First off, a supercharger is WAY more parasitic than an a/c compressor. The amount of power needed to compress enough air to feed an engine is quite a bit more than the small amount of freon that is compressed. When tuning a car you want to tune a variety of conditions, part throttle and WOT both. Supercharging makes very little difference tuning wide and you certainly don't gain any power over turbo through the tuning methods for a s/c.

  37. #197
    WRX on Roids
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    39
    Posts
    424
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by green91
    Wow i don't even know where to start with this statement. First off, a supercharger is WAY more parasitic than an a/c compressor. The amount of power needed to compress enough air to feed an engine is quite a bit more than the small amount of freon that is compressed. When tuning a car you want to tune a variety of conditions, part throttle and WOT both. Supercharging makes very little difference tuning wide and you certainly don't gain any power over turbo through the tuning methods for a s/c.
    But either way when tuning a car, SC or turbo, you place the car under max. load to ensure proper fuel mapping. I also know about WOT and partial throttle parameters which don't play as big of a role as: going up hill, AC on, etc...

  38. #198
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    So basically your argument is that s/c are better because its more difficult to fully load a turbo on the dyno? I do agree that dyno rollers don't completely simulate real load conditions (and this is only if its a large turbo) but it is very close, close enough to where 99% of tuners can add a certain percentage of fuel and be extremely accurate, not to mention road testing afterward. So i think thats pretty much a null argument

  39. #199
    Mountain man green91's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahlonega, Ga
    Posts
    8,975
    Rep Power
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Footefan52
    But either way when tuning a car, SC or turbo, you place the car under max. load to ensure proper fuel mapping. I also know about WOT and partial throttle parameters which don't play as big of a role as: going up hill, AC on, etc...
    EH having a/c on and going up hill doesn't really make any difference tuning wise.

  40. #200
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    43
    Posts
    2,964
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atlsrt44
    all the same at the flywheel maybe but definately not at the wheels. Stock srt4s dyno higher than 230.
    well looks like everyone else in here is not to defend there civics.. but you are here to defend the hp of your neon aintcha..

    well i've owned 3 civics, loved it, modified it, SOld Some, Bought Some more, a very on going side job, for gett'n that xtra $$$ and all the motors were making under 120, and took me places 4rom point A to B.. thats that.. and i do believe i'd riced the fucc out of one of them.. and @ that year.. i've sold it for about 9k and only spend like 4k in it .. ..
    Last edited by YouKnowIt; 04-23-2008 at 09:35 PM.
    /Oo ___A___ oO\
    |=_/_______\_=|



Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!