
Originally Posted by
ahabion
You have children? I'm just curious... because in some ways, what you're saying is actually agreeing with me. Where your genetics come into play, rebellion is in our DNA and the very fabric of who we are.
Although its inhumane and completely unethical, if you were to lock up a child or confine a new born child in a place that provided all the necessities that it needed (food, changing, etc.) that I am absolutely sure that the baby will one day rebel. Even if there were only positive human influences or interactions or none at all. So to say that a baby is a product of its environment is off base as well. Even if the baby was cared for by machines that monitored the baby 100% of the time and knew when the baby would poop before the baby ever did or knew when the baby would be hungry, the baby still has a choice to take the nipple to eat.
Because what you're saying is that these things are learned but what I'm saying is that they are not learned but born within us... already a part of us to the core of our DNA.
What I find interesting about your remarks about Christianity being static is that we as human beings like to consider ourselves as "evolving." Where the longer we are on this earth, the smarter we are or were in comparison to the previous generation or generations before us. Case in point, because we live in the 21st century, we'd like to say that we as a people and as a society are more "evolved" than people in the 10th, 15th, or 20th century. The irony about this is that through all mankind, this same type of thinking occured throughout the entire history of mankind. For example, the Renaissance was seen as the pinnacle point of mankind back in that day in age, both as a society and intellectually. To say that we've evolved from then would actually be a misnomer because as a society, culture, and as a people, we've digressed in comparison. So the thinking or your train of thought is actually what is static... as the train of thought has remained the same throughout the ages.