I decided this was so funny it was worth another post. Napoleon is the famous dictator turned short lived conqueror and one of the greatest military minds of his time. His time was the early nineteenth century... and he was the dictatorial leader of France... he died a hundred years before Mussolini ruled Italy.Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
I'm in awe of how stupid you are.
Wow, you truly are just an absolute idiot that can't think beyond whatever someone regurgitates at you........WOW!!!! Since you can't think for yourself and deductive reasoning is not your friend, I'll explain what I was trying to say to those that have IQ's higher than spit. BOTH of them were dictators/Socialists who used forms of "wealth distribution", yet anyone with a high school education knows how well that worked out for BOTH of them. Get it now Mensa card carrier? Probably not.I gave you too much credit before and figured I didn't have to spell things out since you think you know so much and this was basic History. I'll be sure to use smaller words, big bold pictures, and pop-ups next time.
If you're too stupid to be able to quote someone correctly on this forum even after I've already made fun of you for being a newbie quoter, then you don't deserve any more of my attention.
I wasn't misquoting you... you said "Italy during Napoleon and Mussolini"... intimating that both were Italian dictators and possibly that both ruled Italy together at the same time.Wow, you truly are just an absolute idiot that can't think beyond whatever someone regurgitates at you........WOW!!!! Since you can't think for yourself and deductive reasoning is not your friend, I'll explain what I was trying to say to those that have IQ's higher than spit. BOTH of them were dictators/Socialists who used forms of "wealth distribution", yet anyone with a high school education knows how well that worked out for BOTH of them. Get it now Mensa card carrier? Probably not.
If you're too stupid to be able to quote someone correctly on this forum even after I've already made fun of you for being a newbie quoter, then you don't deserve any more of my attention.
More over, your arguments suck, considering both rulers were ousted by (Napoleon lived under English house arrest on an island for the rest of his life and Mussolini was caught by anti-fascist guerillas then shot and hung up like a piece of meat) foreign military force and not by economic collapse... not that Napoleon was a socialist in any case, as stated earlier.
In any case, you can refer back to my post where I listed all those terrible socialist Western European/Scandinavian countries that are horribly underdeveloped because of their socialistic tendencies. Turns out based on a composite of political freedom/healthcare/GDP per capita/etc they enjoy a higher standard of living than us.
Or perhaps you'd rather just use your anecdotal argument, like referring to countries who's problem wasn't Socialism but Fascism or countries that collapsed because of Communism, a wholly seperate economic design than socialism.
U R DUM
What happens when people ASSume???
Glad you read your 8th grade History book so you can come back and educate us all. You still missed the whole point, but I'm not even going to bother to repeat it to you again. Your head must be made of Oak.More over, your arguments suck, considering both rulers were ousted by (Napoleon lived under English house arrest on an island for the rest of his life and Mussolini was caught by anti-fascist guerillas then shot and hung up like a piece of meat) foreign military force and not by economic collapse... not that Napoleon was a socialist in any case, as stated earlier.
Then there's an SAS flight waiting to take you to the promised land.....In any case, you can refer back to my post where I listed all those terrible socialist Western European/Scandinavian countries that are horribly underdeveloped because of their socialistic tendencies. Turns out based on a composite of political freedom/healthcare/GDP per capita/etc they enjoy a higher standard of living than us.
Because there is only one kind of Socialism, right? Because not one of those different variants of Socialism have anything to do with Communism, right?Or perhaps you'd rather just use your anecdotal argument, like referring to countries who's problem wasn't Socialism but Fascism or countries that collapsed because of Communism, a wholly seperate economic design than socialism.
U R DUM
Short version, socialism works, it works better than what we have going on here, Communism and Socialism have about as much in common as our own economic system and communism. Napoleon wasn't a socialist, as far as I know never even set foot in Italy and died about a hundred years before the rise of fascism and I'm still shocked you're dumb enough to put Mussolini and Napoleon in the same sentence.What happens when people ASSume???
I wasn't assuming anything. You explicitly stated "Italy during Napoleon and Mussolini".
Glad you read your 8th grade History book so you can come back and educate us all. You still missed the whole point, but I'm not even going to bother to repeat it to you again. Your head must be made of Oak.
You can just admit you are a dumbass. There really isn't any wiggle room in "Italy during Napoleon and Mussolini" - none.
Also, Mussolini wasn't a socialist either.
" Much later in life Mussolini said he felt by 1919 "Socialism as a doctrine was already dead; it continued to exist only as a grudge" "
"In power, the party attempted to form an economic policy that was a "third way" between capitalism and socialism, this was called Corporatism. In theory, trade unions and businesses would unite to form a cooperative organization to establish wages, hours of labour, and other issues. However when attempted to be put into practice, corporatism was heavily criticized by the industries who had provided financing in the past to Mussolini to protect them from socialism, and demanded that he keep the labour movement weakened to maintain their support, to which Mussolini and the party agreed, causing corporatism to favour businesses over workers who could only be in Fascist unions"
The failure of this argument is threefold, not only was Mussolini not a socialist, his decline from power was the result of military action and not economic implosion and it does nothing to disprove what in fact is happening right now with socialistic countries enjoying a higher standard of living than the United States.
Then there's an SAS flight waiting to take you to the promised land.....
While its true that one country ahead of us, Australia, does indeed have a unit called the "Special Air Service", I have a feeling you are too dumb to know about this and are referring to the English unit.
England wasn't ahead of us. Once again, epic failure.
Because there is only one kind of Socialism, right? Because not one of those different variants of Socialism have anything to do with Communism, right?
Socialism is about some kind of redistribution of wealth for the benefit of the whole population.
Communism is about COMPLETE CONTROL AND OWNERSHIP OF THE ECONOMY BY THE STATE.
You were wrong, you have no idea what you are talking about and as a person you're not so smart. Bye.
Last edited by The12lber; 06-06-2008 at 02:00 PM.
You are quickly getting on my last good nerve. You can't read worth a $hit, and you certainly can't think beyond your two left feet.
SAS= SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINE(S) SYSTEM.
Scandinavia= Your promised land. The land you keep ejaculating all over yourself about being so much better than the U.S. The place where much like IA even you probably wouldn't even fit in because you're too stupid to read or comprehend.
"Get on a SAS flight"= Get on a SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES flight and go to where YOU think is all soooooo groovy and uber better than where you have your feet planted. NOT Australia, NOT Indonesia, NOT Antartica.
Get it now, jacka$$? Again, probably NOT......
Just like YOU are too thick to get the correlation that BOTH Mussolini AND Napoleon, whom we've already established even my 9 yr old son KNOWS was the ruler of FRANCE, took from wealthy people to supposedly give to the poor......ala, Robin Hood.....ala, an early form of "wealth distribution"......ala, what YOU think is so uber cool and just. It has NOTHING to do with where, when, or how they each ruled. NOTHING, stupid. N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!!! Clear enough Magoo?
Seriously kid, stay off my nuts. You're not even fun to debate with. Maybe one day when you're old enough to vote, drink, have sex, or become a grown man.....THEN I may take you seriously. As it stands, you're just an irritating kid.
None of this really changes the fact that you were all crazy about the evils of socialism, I proved you wrong by pointing out that a number of socialistic countries enjoy a higher standard of living than us and now you're having an adult hissy fit. Its quite pathetic.You are quickly getting on my last good nerve. You can't read worth a $hit, and you certainly can't think beyond your two left feet.
SAS= SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINE(S) SYSTEM.
Doesn't exist lol?
Scandinavia= Your promised land. The land you keep ejaculating all over yourself about being so much better than the U.S. The place where much like IA even you probably wouldn't even fit in because you're too stupid to read or comprehend (what is this, elementary school?).
That is funny, because I'm fairly confident I was right about everything I said and had evidence to prove it and you were wrong.
I wasn't getting too excited. You were the one who went all crazy going
"SOCIALISM IS EVIL LOL, RMBR HITLER AND MUSSOLINI AND NAPOLEON N ****? AHHHH"
"Get on a SAS flight"= Get on a SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES flight and go to where YOU think is all soooooo groovy and uber better than where you have your feet planted. NOT Australia, NOT Indonesia, NOT Antartica.
Get it now, jacka$$? Again, probably NOT......
Just like YOU are too thick to get the correlation that BOTH Mussolini AND Napoleon, whom we've already established even my 9 yr old son KNOWS was the ruler of FRANCE, took from wealthy people to supposedly give to the poor......ala, Robin Hood.....ala, an early form of "wealth distribution"......ala, what YOU think is so uber cool and just. It has NOTHING to do with where, when, or how they each ruled. NOTHING, stupid. N-O-T-H-I-N-G!!!!! Clear enough Magoo?
You said "Italy during Napoleon and Mussolini". There's no wiggling out of it, you're dumb.
On top of it, neither were socialists.
Seriously kid, stay off my nuts. You're not even fun to debate with. Maybe one day when you're old enough to vote <been registered for a year, drink < lol?, have sex <more than you, or become a grown man < I have more facial hair, muscle and a deeper voice than you.....THEN I may take you seriously. As it stands, you're just an irritating kid.
Also, the point wasn't to say "THESE GUYS ARE SOOO MUCH BETTER THAN US"
The point was that we have problems here in America and wealth redistribution is a way to fix one of them but the abundance of morons like you who base their opinions about it on misinformation and nonfact are a major speedbump.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote