Quote Originally Posted by Jaimecbr900
Paul, you know you're splitting hairs with me. You are saying "printing" and using it's literal meaning of writing on pages and binding them into a book.

I am using it's more laxed definition of simply "written down". The Bible, as I already pointed out, has parts that are not based on tangible data. Thoughts, fables, prophecies, commands, etc. are all not necessarily based on tangible proof, much like other things that require FAITH as part of the answer.

That's just my point. It is impossible to be able to 100% "prove" religion or beliefs to ANYONE without using FAITH as one of the determining factors. As such by it's very definition, it can NOT be LOGICALLY deciphered. So, if someone is looking at it merely from a "logical" point of view of give me this proof and that proof.....it will never work.
the point of bringing up the age of the bible was to state from my first post about how they have not found anything of the crucifixion of jesus in roman records, records that date back before christ. now actually printing 15th century the bible was printed, from what i now around 1445?bc is the earliest know writings of the bible "moses"... everything before the 15th century had to be hand written... but back to my point, there are works older than the bible that say different than the bible. Am i trying to disprove the bible, NO, just proviing my earlier point that everyone didn't seem to believe. (you know i'm always up for a good Efight bro)