My argument is/was...
When it comes to making power under the same conditions, it went like this
SR20<KA24<Rb25<RB26
He took it out of context.
He initially lost the argument and took it somewhere else.
My argument is/was...
When it comes to making power under the same conditions, it went like this
SR20<KA24<Rb25<RB26
He took it out of context.
He initially lost the argument and took it somewhere else.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
You'll always notice a way bigger gap in the whp/wtq with a sr20.
No matter what HP dynosheet you post next about an sr20, we are not talking about the number, as too many variables can determine that, but rather the whp/wtq gap.
The point is... the gap doesnt matter....... you dont need low range torque with you launch at 5k rpm with the turbo spooled and then gain power throughout the rev.
We're arguing who would win the game played yesterday..... we already know the score....... THE FASTEST SR20 IS FASTER THAN THE FASTEST RB26...... AND A HELL OF A LOT FASTER THAN THE FASTEST KA24.....
Those are your opinions which I understand and don't argue. That is personal preference you like one over the other, great!
My question is the above? please respond.