Rons Auto Sales "Inc"

[Catnip]

Come on Scratches and Curb Rash...Thats just excuse's to me.

I don't see what's wrong with pointing out scratches and screwed up wheels when the car was advertised as perfect.

[DecoyOctopus]

I don't see what's wrong with pointing out scratches and screwed up wheels when the car was advertised as perfect.

another good point

[Brandon C]

I don't see what's wrong with pointing out scratches and screwed up wheels when the car was advertised as perfect.

Here is The AD. Where was Perfect Advertised I have been searching for a minute and cannot find that anywhere.
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...ice=&cardist=1

[Dracc]

I don't see what's wrong with pointing out scratches and screwed up wheels when the car was advertised as perfect.

thats a great point.. and brandon has to look at it from two ways.. 1st the dealers way.. we sell cars for as much as we think they are worth and push out price or close to our "close out" that we want to come out on top on the back end to make our money

Now with that said the customer pointing out scratches we dont care as a salesmen, we have instilled in our minds what we want to sell this car for and thats final

but when we take a trade in.. we dont give the customer what they want for there trade.. we noticed every little ding scratch and flaw on the "walk around" when we appraise the vehicle dropping the price as we go around the car and do a Visual inspection. * note all dealerships do this dirt lot or "big wig" dealerships" before they give you an actual price.

so if a customer has a trade in a wants 8k firm for the trade in because they owe 7k and want to make 1k off of it. Should the dealer blow up and call the customer a cheat infront of his family and friends?

if a dealer has a car for sale for 15.9k and was offered 14.9k for it should the dealer get insulted and go off on the custmer for giving him a price.

there is no law stating a man can not come on to property public nor private that is considered an establishment trade, saying they can not haggle pricing for furniture, food, or in this case vehicles. both sides seem to be wrong but Rons side seems to be by far the worst..

[Brandon C]

thats a great point.. and brandon has to look at it from two ways.. 1st the dealers way.. we sell cars for as much as we think they are worth and push out price or close to our "close out" that we want to come out on top on the back end to make our money

Now with that said the customer pointing out scratches we dont care as a salesmen, we have instilled in our minds what we want to sell this car for and thats final

but when we take a trade in.. we dont give the customer what they want for there trade.. we noticed every little ding scratch and flaw on the "walk around" when we appraise the vehicle dropping the price as we go around the car and do a Visual inspection. * note all dealerships do this dirt lot or "big wig" dealerships" before they give you an actual price.

so if a customer has a trade in a wants 8k firm for the trade in because they owe 7k and want to make 1k off of it. Should the dealer blow up and call the customer a cheat infront of his family and friends?

if a dealer has a car for sale for 15.9k and was offered 14.9k for it should the dealer get insulted and go off on the custmer for giving him a price.

there is no law stating a man can not come on to property public nor private that is considered an establishment trade, saying they can not haggle pricing for furniture, food, or in this case vehicles. both sides seem to be wrong but Rons side seems to be by far the worst..

I am Confused! I agreed with you up to that point. Are you saying Ron was in the wrong for telling the Guy to leave or getting upset or was the kid in the wrong. We really dont know the entire story here. I jumped early on the Kid but I can tell you that Ron generaly does not get upset enough to act like he described and I have Pissed him off plenty in my life. I am sorry I am tired and really would have not had to see this today after the day I had. I say win the argument Lose the sale never works for anybody customer of Dealership.

[Dracc]

I am Confused! I agreed with you up to that point. Are you saying Ron was in the wrong for telling the Guy to leave or getting upset or was the kid in the wrong. We really dont know the entire story here. I jumped early on the Kid but I can tell you that Ron generaly does not get upset enough to act like he described and I have Pissed him off plenty in my life. I am sorry I am tired and really would have not had to see this today after the day I had. I say win the argument Lose the sale never works for anybody customer of Dealership.

in the video ron actualy got Phsyical and tried to take the camera from what it looks like. If the kid who was taping wanted to, he could charge Ron with simple assault and personal property damage. Ron never had a right to touch the camera even though his establishment is private property

[Brandon C]

in the video ron actualy got Phsyical and tried to take the camera from what it looks like. If the kid who was taping wanted to, he could charge Ron with simple assault and personal property damage. Ron never had a right to touch the camera even though his establishment is private property

He never did. It was a camera Phone and he tried to tell them to stop and leave over and over whatch it closely. The Kid jumps back when ron tried to put his hand over the lens. I think that Video is very amusing as it looks to me as Ron is fustrated to hell and Back with an Angry Kid that would not leave his property. I could be wrong..Oh and it is against the law for them to post up that Video of Ron without consent he could sue them for Slander amongst other things..That is why Ron is not posting up the Whole Video I am Sure.

[Dracc]

He never did. It was a camera Phone and he tried to tell them to stop and leave over and over whatch it closely. The Kid jumps back when ron tried to put his hand over the lens. I think that Video is very amusing as it looks to me as Ron is fustrated to hell and Back with an Angry Kid that would not leave his property. I could be wrong..Oh and it is against the law for them to post up that Video of Ron without consent he could sue them for Slander amongst other things..That is why Ron is not posting up the Whole Video I am Sure.

alot could be done from todays events both sides need to calm down, apologize like men and go their seperate ways.




edit: 2 hours of sleep in 3 days. Stupid has taken over.

[BKgen®]

go there seperate ways.

their.

[Brandon C]

alot could be done from todays events both sides need to calm down, apologize like men and go there seperate ways.

Agreed and I bet Ron let it go right after it happend but The Kid Did this Thread.

And to ANwser the Finance Question was probably not as he Had wasted my time on many a car when I worked there but Ron Still let him drive a car everytime he came and claimed to be ready. Like I said this was deeper than just 1 day

[quickdodge®]

thats a great point.. and brandon has to look at it from two ways.. 1st the dealers way.. we sell cars for as much as we think they are worth and push out price or close to our "close out" that we want to come out on top on the back end to make our money

Now with that said the customer pointing out scratches we dont care as a salesmen, we have instilled in our minds what we want to sell this car for and thats final

but when we take a trade in.. we dont give the customer what they want for there trade.. we noticed every little ding scratch and flaw on the "walk around" when we appraise the vehicle dropping the price as we go around the car and do a Visual inspection. * note all dealerships do this dirt lot or "big wig" dealerships" before they give you an actual price.

so if a customer has a trade in a wants 8k firm for the trade in because they owe 7k and want to make 1k off of it. Should the dealer blow up and call the customer a cheat infront of his family and friends?

if a dealer has a car for sale for 15.9k and was offered 14.9k for it should the dealer get insulted and go off on the custmer for giving him a price.

there is no law stating a man can not come on to property public nor private that is considered an establishment trade, saying they can not haggle pricing for furniture, food, or in this case vehicles. both sides seem to be wrong but Rons side seems to be by far the worst..

You keep saying "we." Who is "we?" Later, QD.

[Dracc]

You keep saying "we." Who is "we?" Later, QD.

I used to be a dealer and a floor manager for a major dealership in columbia, Pulliam Ford before i moved here. Basically talking as if I were still selling cars to let people know I was once in this position as a saleman dizzle.