You are comparing two cars and stating how one is better when you have never driven either, race either, or modded either car. I'm not changing what I said. You cannot attest to the performance or potential of these sports cars when you've probably never driven anything faster than your Eclipse.Originally Posted by redGT
Really?Let me refresh your memory for you as you must be going senile.
Starting to ring any bells.
Again according to your logic no one should be allowed to speculate what car can compete with what other car etc. etc. if they have not owned one. Which really means no need for car talk section,Car and Driver, Road and Track, Top Gear, Autmobile, Super Street, Import Tuner, Sport Compact car or any other automotive news organization unless they themselves have owned and modded whatever car it is they are writing about.
Just as I cannot comment on why a Lamborghini is better than a Ferrari. They are 2 vehicles I've never driven, modded, raced, been in, etc. You go off what you read on the internet. This makes you an ignorant ricer. The reason C&D, Top Gear can rate cars is because they drive and race them. This might be a little much for you to grasp but please do try.
The GTR's 'claimed' numbers still fall way short of the Z06's PROVEN numbers/times.
As far as realibility; C6 Z06s are offered with 100,000 mile warranties. A 10sec car with a warranty and you can put whatever tires you want on there.
Reply With Quote