Originally Posted by admin
the only problem is that from what I know, there hasn't been much of any documentation of large scale macroevolution, only theories. In a thousand years, there will be more than likely be better documentation of macroevolution, and I think from there people can start coming to more educated conclusions, but it'd still take a few more thousand years of documenting to come to a solid one that doesn't have any doubt in either case. Right now its just comparing bone structure and such. The velociraptor has similar bone structure to a bird - would you think one evolved from the other? I'm not stating that macroevolution doesn't happen, I'm just stating as before that there hasn't been enough documentation within the past hundred years to really prove much of anything ( since the evolution that tends to be debated against creationalism takes place over thousands of years ) - for all we know evolution could be cyclical, or continuously balanced as human beings ( meaning I dont think that like in the 5000 years humans are gonna have some new special ability or something like breath underwater or some weird stuff like that unless human intervention is involved )
Reply With Quote