Quote Originally Posted by admin
this shit is still going...



reproduction is adaptation which is a form of evolution, there is obviously an arguement worth discussion we are at 7 pages
well wikipediaing adaptation, like the moths example, its just a form of microevolution - where to actually sum it up? microevolution is just where the best survive and continue on - another form of microevolution/reproduction to further prove my point is say you have brown hair, blue eyes, and your spouse has blonde hair and blue eyes - you bang each other - 9 months later, baby pops out - has dirty blonde hair and blue eyes - microevolution right there - 25 years later, they're with their spouse who say, hm, has green eyes and brown hair - get their freak on - 9 months later pop out a kid - brown hair, green eyes - 25 years later they do say a dirty blonde with blue eyes - and pop out a blonde hair blue eyes - all microevolution

so even reproduction doesn't have much of anything to do much with the evolution/creationalism arguement

another case and point - Nazi's committing genocide, wanting the perfect blonde hair blue eyes race - with what you were stating, then if they had succeeded, that would be evolution :confused:



by the way - I don't know if you've heard about it or not

but the idea that God himself created the big bang - now personally I can believe that idea as well - if you think about how time is to God and what not, when the Bible states in Genesis that " God created the Heavens and the Earth " - well he could've created it in one really big CLICKY POW! (haha sorry I had to use that word )