Quote Originally Posted by David88vert View Post
He believes in randomization.
Random mutations yes, but also in natural selection which is absolutely NOT random.

Quote Originally Posted by David88vert View Post
Here is a simple exercise that anyone can do, and one that defeated him.
Take any sentence of reasonable length. Change any two letters at a time. Make the message clearer to understand (improve the information). Example: "The brown cow jumped over the moon, while the mouse ate a piece of cheese."
A Creationist made a randomizer based upon this principle, so that you don't have to do it manually, if you prefer.
http://www.randommutation.com/
I'm not sure what this proves. It sounds like in your analogy the sentence is a genetic sequence and each letter is a gene. However if that's the case it doesn't make sense because you can change a single gene in a genetic code and have a great effect (positive or negative). Thousands of diseases are caused by a single gene. Additionally there is a perfect English sentence but there isn't a perfect genetic code. If you start with a random assortment of letters and do enough random mutation you absolutely could get a perfect English sentence but you are trying to take something that is perfect and make it more perfect. Of course that's impossible.