"all point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not increase it."
This is exactly opposite of what evolutionists claim. They claim that mutations caused single celled organisms to evolve into people.
But, how could a single celled organism evolve into anything if a mutation would cause it to lose genetic information?
Evolution demands mutations that produce new information. But mutations cannot and do not provide new information.
Some Evolutionists like Pierre-Paul Grasse are starting to see this flaw in their theory. Grasse is on record as saying:
"No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution."
"I agree 100 percent with my creationist brethren that our ancestors did not swing from trees by their tails"
A chameleon didnt acquire the trait of changing colors by evolving from a different lizard...even that is too big of a mutation or evolution...so monkey to human is pretty much absurd...
Reply With Quote