Religion - Join in the fun!

[Maniacc]

This is still going?

You can't prove either way, evolution or God's creation. Give it a rest, lol!

I'm fucking Maniac, man. What do you expect?

lIn fact, Hitching stated that he considered the modern theory of evolution "so inadequate that it deserves to be treated as a matter of faith."

There's a difference between an evolution theory and faith.

You should know better.

i gotta fart..........................................feel much better. it kinda smell like egg.

CivictR is the only person known to man who got rejected in an attempt to make extra cash at the sperm bank with his donation. Turns out there's enough retarded people in this world.

Seriously, shut the fuck up.

[bookthief]

There's a difference between an evolution theory and faith.

You should know better.

Many advocates of evolution feel that they do have sufficient reason to insist that evolution is a fact. They explain that they are just arguing over details. But if any other theory had such enormous remaining difficulties, and such major contradictions among those who advocate it, would it so readily be pronounced a fact? Merely repeating that something is a fact does not make it a fact. As John R. Durant, a biologist, wrote in The Guardian of London: "Many scientists succumb to the temptation to be dogmatic,...over and over again the question of the origin of the species has presented as if it were finally settled. Nothing could be further from the truth...But the tendency to be dogmatic persists, and it does no service to the cause of science."

[Maniacc]

Many advocates of evolution feel that they do have sufficient reason to insist that evolution is a fact. They explain that they are just arguing over details. But if any other theory had such enormous remaining difficulties, and such major contradictions among those who advocate it, would it so readily be pronounced a fact? Merely repeating that something is a fact does not make it a fact. As John R. Durant, a biologist, wrote in The Guardian of London: "Many scientists succumb to the temptation to be dogmatic,...over and over again the question of the origin of the species has presented as if it were finally settled. Nothing could be further from the truth...But the tendency to be dogmatic persists, and it does no service to the cause of science."

So you're some brainiac now huh? You paying more attention in science class now?

I don't need to post up a huge wall of text just to shut you up because I know that you're not educated enough in this subject and that you're not going to be able to respond with something of equal value.

[bookthief]

So you're some brainiac now huh? You paying more attention in science class now?

I don't need to post up a huge wall of text just to shut you up because I know that you're not educated enough in this subject and that you're not going to be able to respond with something of equal value.

HAHAHAHAHA!
c'mon brother, I can take you.
You have taught me well

Ok what about this--what about creation as an explanation of how life got here? Does it offer a framework for the evidence that is any more sound than the assertions that often underpin evolution?
And, as the best-known creation account, does Genesis shed any credible light on how the earth and living things got here?