You are correct. Now explain to me why you voted "NO" that it would not take off?Originally Posted by RJ's325ITS
You are correct. Now explain to me why you voted "NO" that it would not take off?Originally Posted by RJ's325ITS
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
B/c it was a fictional question....... if it was a realistic question you will get a real answer... just MPO.Originally Posted by Ruiner
TRM Stage 2 │TRM Coilovers │ TRM Pistons │ TRM Blowthrough Tuning │ TRM MAF & Injectors │ Watch My Crazy Videos
..... planes don't take off by pushing air.... they take off by creating lift.... they push air to gain speed.. the speed helps them create the lift.....
planes don't push air? how do you suppose they travel forward to create that lift?Originally Posted by Killer
now ur treading into murky waters, depends on ur definition of "push"Originally Posted by speedminded
read what i said again......Originally Posted by speedminded
they push air to gain speed to create lift.... i never said they don't push air...
i didn't say they didn't push air.... but pushing air alone is not going to make one take off.. i can push air out of my ass all day long and not take off unless i had wings and was creating lift... but to creat the lift i would have to be splitting the opposing air with my wings...(plane like wings).. now rockets take off just by pushing air.... but they push air vertically... not horizontally like a plane does...
why is everyone going so deep into the question.. forget all the extra little variables such as wind speed, alltitude, weight of passangers on board, wether the pilot is wearing a toupee or not..
The small variables are what they use to justify why it won't take off since their brain cannot grasp that it will take off.Originally Posted by Hektik
![]()
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
can you explain to me how it could take off?Originally Posted by Ruiner
saying it would take off on a treadmill is like saying you would feel the G force when dynoing a car (well, if you sat in it anyway) your tires maybe going 100 mph... but ur still sitting still, so is the car, and there is no opposing force.
**NEWS FLASH** A PLANE IS NOT A CAR, PLANES ARE NOT POWERED BY THEIR WHEELS. ERASE THE WORDS AND ALL EXPERIENCES WITH DYNOS AND AUTOMOBILES FROM YOUR MIND.Originally Posted by Killer
Originally Posted by speedminded
your a fucking idiot... no shit a plane and a car is different.. but the concept is the same dick face... g force is g force whether created in a plane or a car... it does not matter what is powering the vehicle or aircraft.
http://crankyflier.blogspot.com/2006...treadmill.html
http://www.kottke.org/06/02/plane-conveyor-belt
and last but not least...... http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/move.html
The word "thrust" might be a lil harder to comprehendOriginally Posted by shagwAg3n
![]()
no, the concept isn't the same at all...and not even close. A car on a free spinning dyno or treadmill that is going the same speed the opposite direction WILL prevent a car from going anywhere. A treadmill going either direction at any speed WILL NEVER effect a planes ability to propel its self forward, gain speed & lift, and take off just like any other runway.Originally Posted by Killer
FYI: This guy is a complete idiot, lol...
http://crankyflier.blogspot.com/2006...treadmill.html
I can't even tell what the final answer is here, too much conflicting...
http://www.kottke.org/06/02/plane-conveyor-belt
that's why i posted this link... argue with actual rocket scientist bub....Originally Posted by speedminded
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/move.html
What does that link have to do with anything? First figure out if a plane will propel itself forward, you answered yes on the poll...Originally Posted by Killer
Killer - It's this simple: A plane moves via its engines which run through the air. The wheels are only there to keep the plane off of the ground.
Just look at ski plans, boat planes, or other planes without wheels. They still take off. The treadmill would just make the plane's wheels spin faster, but otherwise it would have NO affect on the plane itself.
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
ski planes don't just sit still and take off, they gain speed on the water/snow then take off.... you're right it has nothing to do with the wheels... but everything to do with speed... a plane must gain ground speed to create wind speed which causes the plain to lift...Originally Posted by Ruiner
i want you to get on a treadmill with a kite and put on some roller blades... or run if you'd like... see how long it takes you to get that kite in the air....
i promise it won't lift.. even if you put a jet pack on your back.. until you gain enough SPEED to create LIFT
you obviously can't read anything..... and i voted no genius...Originally Posted by speedminded
ah, you did... i did CTRL F and searched your name and thought i saw yes -- oh well, too bad for you.Originally Posted by Killer
Correct. However, what I am telling you is that a treadmill, going backwards, CANNOT prevent a plane from moving forward.Originally Posted by Killer
Understand what I am saying? A treadmill, no matter how fast it is spinning in reverse, cannot stop a plane from moving forward, gaining speed, and eventually taking off.
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Why do you think the plane will not gain ground speed? What's preventing the engines from creating thrust and propelling the plane forward?Originally Posted by Killer
Last edited by speedminded; 08-15-2007 at 11:26 AM.
He thinks that the treadmill, rolling in reverse, can prevent a plane from moving forward. THAT is where he has an error in logic.Originally Posted by speedminded
![]()
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Killer - watch these:
Here it is with your own eyes. The plane moves forward. Given a long enough runway, it would gain speed, generate lift, and finally take off:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EopVDgSPAk
Another one showing the plane moving forward:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDliz-YinyY
Using the flatbed of a truck as the treadmill that moves in the opposite direction:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHUnAU0MyHM
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
ohhh, so you mean those doubting should think about if the plane will actually move forward before debating how wings create lift and all that nonsense?Originally Posted by Ruiner
Killer - I'm a very educated man in terms of books, mathematics, theory, physics, etc. Please trust me when I tell you that it WILL move forward, gain speed, and eventually take off given a long enough runway.
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Yes! If they can understand the concept that the plane WILL move forward no matter what the treadmill is doing, they can then logically draw the conclusion that forward movement will lead to acceleration. That acceleration will approach take-off speed and the plane is in the air...Originally Posted by speedminded
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
I have lost faith in our education system.![]()
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Originally Posted by Ruiner
if it moves faster than the treadmill yeah... it will then just take longer for it to gain speed....
but theoretically putting it on a treadmill would cause it not to gain speed.... most are going to assume the treadmill and the plane are moving at the same speed, there for leaving the plane motionless.
obvious if i put a treadmill at it's slowest speed and i run faster than it.. i'm going to run off the treadmill.....
The speed of the treadmill has no effect on the plane, it can be moving backwards 10 times or 100 times the forward speed of the plane and it still will not effect the forward motion of the plane.Originally Posted by Killer
What powers the plane, what makes it go forward?
yes it does.... how much forward motion do you generate while running on a treadmill???? 0Originally Posted by speedminded
now strap some wheels to your feet... and add a jet engine to your anus..... set the treadmill speed to the same speed your engine creates.... how much forward motion do you generate.... 0...
A few things:Originally Posted by Killer
What I bolded breaks the problem's statement - The treadmill moves at the same SPEED as the plane. If the plane is motionless, the treadmill is as well.
Running on a treadmill and having a plane on a treadmill are two TOTALLY different things. You cannot compare the two. However, if you have rollerskates on the treadmill...
You still aren't getting it... Didn't you watch the movies that I posted?
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Wrong. Just watch the videos. You are having a hard time grasping this. Free spinning wheels are just that - free spinning. The treadmill will just make them spin FASTER. The plane will still move forward, however.Originally Posted by Killer
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Killer - ever had an advanced college physics theory class?
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
Its a rather simple idea. People are thinking way too far into this.Originally Posted by Ruiner
Actually, I'd reason that they do not have the logic skills to understand this question.Originally Posted by TheTurtle
AIM: RuinerTT
2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE
People are powered by their feet, generated by what is in contact with the surface. Planes are not powered by their wheels...Originally Posted by Killer
Here you are on the right track -- if someone were on a treadmill on rollerskates and someone was behind them could they not keep them from rolling off the back with just one finger? Speed up the treadmill do you think it is any more difficult to hold them in the same place?Originally Posted by Killer
The flatbed one was dumb. To the plane the "ground" is still stationary no matter how fast they drive the truck. Our airports don't compensate for the earth's rotation do they? The first link explains it the best.Originally Posted by Ruiner
![]()
I was being "P.C." lolOriginally Posted by Ruiner
![]()