Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 119 of 119

Thread: interesting argument.. (for the self proclaimed geniuses of IA)

  1. #81
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tony
    Saw this on Supraforums and it was a pretty interesting read.

    A plane (747 passenger jet) is sitting on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyor). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves in the opposite direction. This conveyor has a control system that tracks the planes speed and tunes the speed of the conveyor to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction).

    The question is:

    Will the plane (747 passenger jet) take off or not?
    I would say that it wont take off. If this was in a closed room, where there was no opposite air flow moving under the wings then ti wont take off. Say even if you have a conveyor moving in the opposite direction of the plane, then the plane starts up thrust to move the plane forward to match the speed of the conveyor. But the way the question is worded, you said that the thurst and the conveyor would be moving at the same speed. Well for what you guys are saying that the wheels will beat the drag, then the thrust would have to have a constant gain of velocity, but the question is that they match the speed. So this question could almost be considered impossible becuase if you had a conveyor that could completely match the planes thrust, then you would have a machine that was 100% efficent. But in this situation if it could happen then they conveyor would match the speed of the belt for everybit of its gain on the belt the belt would jsut speed up.

    I mean i could be wrong but from what i understand even if the wheels beat the drag, the belt would jsut speed up more, to coincide with the planes thrust. To me its the same way as saying if you had someone pushing an object with 50N of force to the north and then had someone pushing with 50N of force on the same object to the south, they woudl jsut cancel out!

  2. #82
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle

    I mean i could be wrong but from what i understand even if the wheels beat the drag, the belt would jsut speed up more, to coincide with the planes thrust. To me its the same way as saying if you had someone pushing an object with 50N of force to the north and then had someone pushing with 50N of force on the same object to the south, they woudl jsut cancel out!
    You are wrong. Once the effects of the wheel drag are overcome, the plane will move forward. The "wheel drag" from free-rolling wheels is next to nothing as you and I both know. Remember the wheels are rolling free; not with brakes on. Mechanical wheel drag is relatively small. That "drag" is the ONLY thing working against the plane in reference to the conveyor belt.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  3. #83
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Yeah but to move the plane forward would require a huge conveyor area and then a huge tire area, then the wheels would have to have such grip that it pulls the conveyor nut the conveyor pulling it. Then if that had happened the plane could out trus the conveyor, but to me in a real life situation i dont think this would be possible. But still none the less fun to argue!

  4. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    A little town called Nunyagoddamnbusiness
    Posts
    3,341
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruiner
    You are wrong. Once the effects of the wheel drag are overcome, the plane will move forward. The "wheel drag" from free-rolling wheels is next to nothing as you and I both know. Remember the wheels are rolling free; not with brakes on. Mechanical wheel drag is relatively small. That "drag" is the ONLY thing working against the plane in reference to the conveyor belt.
    Are you over coming wheel drag or the weight of the plane? I have been thinking about this. Once the engines over come the weight of the plane it will move forward regardless. The same way that a hovercraft only has to overcome the weight itself to move forward, the ground becomes a nonfactor once forward momentum is achieved so does the conveyor.

  5. #85
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Yeah but to move the plane forward would require a huge conveyor area and then a huge tire area, then the wheels would have to have such grip that it pulls the conveyor nut the conveyor pulling it. Then if that had happened the plane could out trus the conveyor, but to me in a real life situation i dont think this would be possible. But still none the less fun to argue!
    The wheels roll freely. There is no way for the simulation to take place as described under present-day physics.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  6. #86
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisdavis
    Are you over coming wheel drag or the weight of the plane? I have been thinking about this. Once the engines over come the weight of the plane it will move forward regardless. The same way that a hovercraft only has to overcome the weight itself to move forward, the ground becomes a nonfactor once forward momentum is achieved so does the conveyor.
    Overcoming the weight of the plane would require lift.

    If you want a less "biased" test, think of it this way: Put your car in neutral with a jet engine on the back and let her rip...

    No matter how fast the conveyor belt spins, the car's wheels will also spin at the same rate, backwards in line with the conveyor belt. HOWEVER, the thrust from the engine will push the car forward, even though the wheels are still spinning backwards...
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  7. #87
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruiner
    Overcoming the weight of the plane would require lift.

    If you want a less "biased" test, think of it this way: Put your car in neutral with a jet engine on the back and let her rip...

    No matter how fast the conveyor belt spins, the car's wheels will also spin at the same rate, backwards in line with the conveyor belt. HOWEVER, the thrust from the engine will push the car forward, even though the wheels are still spinning backwards...
    Well from someone i talked to told me that there is no way for teh plane to move or lift off. Becuase if the belt matches the speed on the planes wheels then the plane will stay in the same spot becuase the thrusters are what moves the plane forward,so really the belt is matching hte speed of the thrust not the plane. So i still agree that the plane will just roll nad look likes it hovering in one spot.

  8. #88
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Well from someone i talked to told me that there is no way for teh plane to move or lift off. Becuase if the belt matches the speed on the planes wheels then the plane will stay in the same spot becuase the thrusters are what moves the plane forward,so really the belt is matching hte speed of the thrust not the plane. So i still agree that the plane will just roll nad look likes it hovering in one spot.
    No. You are missing what I am saying. If the plane has ENOUGH forward thrust to break the "drag" created by the wheels, it will move forward.

    Now, understand this. The drag on the wheels will not really be any different if the belt is moving 200mph or 1,000mph. Let's say that that drag at 200mph on the wheels is 10lbs and the drag at 1,000mph is 10lbs. Does this make sense to you?

    Thus, all it will take is 15lbs of thrust, no matter what the speed of the conveyor belt, to move forward as the drag of ~10lbs has been broken/overcome. Drag on the wheels will approach its limits. Drag will not increase (for the most part) past a certain mph on the conveyor belt.

    Think of it this way: put a matchbox car on a treadmill. Put the treadmill on slow, medium, and fast speeds. Hold the car in one spot. Does it take MORE force to hold the car as the treadmill speeds increase? No. Why is that? The drag on the wheels reaches its theoretical limit at the lowest setting. Increasing the speed of hte treadmill does not increase the drag on the wheels as they are allowed to roll freely.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  9. #89
    The People's LLLLLLLLL B16a2 Civic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ga
    Age
    41
    Posts
    31,513
    Rep Power
    56

    Default

    no gas = no go.
    my post is what matters, you guys are being way to technical

    i know you love my swagger
    OG Black Delegation member
    RIP My Homie Elliot Sloan

  10. #90
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Still the belt is moving at the same speed as the wheels, that means the thrust is what is moving the wheels, so if the thrust is moving the wheels then the belt is matching the speed of the thrust, and the plane can only produce so much thrust! Still if this was possible i would bet that the plane will stay in one spot no matter the amount of thrust.

  11. #91
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Still the belt is moving at the same speed as the wheels, that means the thrust is what is moving the wheels, so if the thrust is moving the wheels then the belt is matching the speed of the thrust, and the plane can only produce so much thrust! Still if this was possible i would bet that the plane will stay in one spot no matter the amount of thrust.
    No. The wheels roll freely. The thrust is not moving the wheels. The plane doesn't care about the wheels because they roll freely. The wheels don't really play a part EXCEPT for the small amount of drag that is produced as they spin. That's it. The drag is VERY small. Does that make sense?

    Read what I said in my previous response to you...
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  12. #92
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Speedm0(\)key's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Stone mountain GA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    6,717
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    damn.. you guys are still going at it?
    2004 Nissan 350z Trng
    2004 Subaru WRX STi

    solamente los putos te llegan en numeros

  13. #93
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedM0nkey
    damn.. you guys are still going at it?
    Apparently this concept is difficult for people to grasp? I have explained it 10 times now.

    Once they understand that the wheels roll freely and are basically independent of the plane's motion, it will all become very clear for them.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  14. #94
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Speedm0(\)key's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Stone mountain GA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    6,717
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruiner
    Apparently this concept is difficult for people to grasp? I have explained it 10 times now.

    Once they understand that the wheels roll freely and are basically independent of the plane's motion, it will all become very clear for them.
    i get you if it counts for anything, hey dont you know discount tire mike?
    2004 Nissan 350z Trng
    2004 Subaru WRX STi

    solamente los putos te llegan en numeros

  15. #95
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedM0nkey
    i get you if it counts for anything, hey dont you know discount tire mike?
    But of course. He is the ONLY person that I allow to put tires on my Porsche. Putting 315/25/19" tires on a 19" HRE is not an easy thing to do. Mike has skills...
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  16. #96
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Still that doesnt matter if the wheels roll freely they are still rolling on the ground with the weight of the plane on them, so that means if they dont roll the plane doesnt move. So really the speed on the wheels even rolling freely, are moving at the same velocity as the force the thrusters are producing. This means that the belt is moving at the same velocity as the thrust is pushing.

  17. #97
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Still that doesnt matter if the wheels roll freely they are still rolling on the ground with the weight of the plane on them, so that means if they dont roll the plane doesnt move. So really the speed on the wheels even rolling freely, are moving at the same velocity as the force the thrusters are producing. This means that the belt is moving at the same velocity as the thrust is pushing.
    No. Think about it this way: Could the wheels on the plane, while it is flying, be rotating backwards if something was causing them to spin? Would that effect the forward thrust of the plane? Not much.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  18. #98
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Okay use your proof of the tredmill. If you but a free folling wheel like the wheel of a plane on a tredmill and put it against the belt and started the tredmill holding it in one spot would be easy. All you would need to do is use work from your arm to hold it there, but to move it forward you would have to use force by your arm of pushing it forward. BUT the question states that the belt will match the speed on the wheel. So if you then pushed the wheel forward with your arm (thrust) the belt would speed up to compensate for the gain in velocity of the wheel, there for the wheel would never go anywhere. So like you said the wheel is free rolling but with no air under the wings the free rolling wheels is what is holding the plane to the ground.

  19. #99
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Okay use your proof of the tredmill. If you but a free folling wheel like the wheel of a plane on a tredmill and put it against the belt and started the tredmill holding it in one spot would be easy. All you would need to do is use work from your arm to hold it there, but to move it forward you would have to use force by your arm of pushing it forward. BUT the question states that the belt will match the speed on the wheel. So if you then pushed the wheel forward with your arm (thrust) the belt would speed up to compensate for the gain in velocity of the wheel, there for the wheel would never go anywhere. So like you said the wheel is free rolling but with no air under the wings the free rolling wheels is what is holding the plane to the ground.
    Yet again, no. You are missing it...

    Imagine a swimming pool with conveyer belt bottom. If you're floating at one end and start swimming towards the other, it doesn't matter if the bottom of the pool starts to shoot away in the opposite direction. You will continue to swim/move relative to the water and reach the other end.

    So getting back to the plane on the conveyer belt - the wheels on the landing gear are there to minimise friction with the ground. That's all they do. The plane's engines provide thrust relative to the air, not the ground.

    The plane in air is like the swimmer in water. It doesn't matter whether the bottom of the pool or the conveyer belt is moving in the opposite direction to the swimmer or plane. The medium through which the plane flies or the swimmer swims is the key.

    Newtons Third law (for every action there is an equal and opposite action) is why you are thinking the plane won't move. But the acting force in the plane is the propellers and not the wheels.

    Read this if you want a longer explanation:

    Manfred's in the airplane. Old Hack has the Army-surplus crane fired up and he's picking up the J-3 and Manfred and carrying them over to Runway 27, which has been transformed into a 3,000-foot conveyor belt. It is a calm day. The conveyor drive is programmed so that if Manfred can start to move in the J-3, if he can generate any airspeed or groundspeed, the conveyor will move toward the east (remember Manfred and the J-3 are facing west) at exactly the speed of the air/groundspeed. Because the wind is calm, if Manfred can generate any indicated airspeed, he will also be generating precisely the same groundspeed. Groundspeed, of course being relative to the ground of the airport surrounding the conveyor belt runway. So, the speed of the conveyor belt eastbound will be the same as Manfred's indicated airspeed, westbound.

    Manfred does his prestart checklist, holds the heel brakes, hits the starter and the little Continental up front clatters to life. Oil pressure comes up and stabilizes and Manfred tries to look busy because the eyes of the world are upon him, but all he can do is make sure the fuel is on and the altimeter and trim are set, then do a quick runup to check the mags and the carb heat. He moves the controls through their full travel and glares at the ailerons, doing his best to look heroic, then holds the stick aft in the slipstream to pin the tail and lets go of the brakes.

    Baron of the Belt

    So far the J-3 has not moved, nor has the conveyor. At idle power, there's not enough thrust to move the J-3 forward on a level surface, so Manfred starts to bring up the power, intending to take off. The propeller rpm increases and the prop shoves air aft, as it does on every takeoff, causing the airplane to move forward through the air, and as a consequence, forward with regard to the ground. Simultaneously the conveyor creaks to life, moving east, under the tires of the J-3. As the J-3 thrusts its way through the air, driven by its propeller, the airspeed indicator comes off the peg at about 10 mph. At that moment the conveyor is moving at 10 mph to the east and the tires are whirling around at 20 mph because the prop has pulled it to an airspeed, and groundspeed, of 10 mph, westbound. The airplane is moving relative to the still air and the ground at 10 mph, but with regard to the conveyor, which is going the other way at 10 mph, the relative speed is 20 mph.

    Manfred relaxes a bit because the conveyor cannot stop him from moving forward. There is nothing on the airplane that pushes against the ground or the conveyor in order for it to accelerate; as Karen -- one of our techies here at the Lounge -- put it, the airplane freewheels. In technical terms, there is some bearing drag on the wheels, but it's under 40 pounds, and the engine has overcome that for years; plus the drag doesn't increase significantly as the wheel speed increases. Unless Manfred applies the brakes, the conveyor cannot affect the rate at which the airplane accelerates.

    A few moments later, the roaring Continental, spinning that wooden Sensenich prop, has accelerated the J-3 and Manfred to 25 mph indicated airspeed. He and the airplane are cruising past the cheering spectators at 25 mph, while the conveyor has accelerated to 25 mph eastbound, yet it still has no way of stopping the airplane's movement through the air. The wheels are spinning at 50 mph, so the noise level is a little high, but otherwise, the J-3 is making a normal, calm-wind takeoff.

    As the indicated airspeed passes 45 mph, groundspeed -- you know, relative to where all those spectators are standing beside the conveyor belt -- is also 45 mph. (At least that's what it says on Manfred's GPS. Being brought back to life seemed to create an insatiable desire for electronic stuff.) The conveyor is also at 45 mph, and the wheels are whizzing around at 90 -- the groundspeed plus the speed of the conveyor in the opposite direction.

    Manfred breaks ground, climbs a few hundred feet, then makes a low pass to see if he can terrify the spectators because they are Americans, descendants of those who defeated his countrymen back in 1918.

    It's All About Airspeed

    While the speed of the conveyor belt in the opposite direction is superficially attractive in saying the airplane cannot accelerate, it truly is irrelevant to what is happening with the airplane, because the medium on which it is acting is the air. The only time it could be a problem is if the wheel speed got so high that the tires blew out.

    I'm reminded of the New York Times editorial when Robert Goddard's rocket experiments were first being publicized. The author of the editorial said that rockets can't work in space because they have nothing to push against. It was laughably wrong, ignoring one of Sir Isaac's laws of physics that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Here the propeller is pushing against the air, as it does every time an airplane takes off. How fast the airplane is moving over the surface on which its wheels rest is irrelevant; the medium is the magic. On a normal takeoff -- no conveyor involved -- if there is a 20 mph headwind, Manfred and the J-3 will lift off at 45 mph indicated airspeed; but relative to the ground, it is only 25 mph. Should the wind increase to 45 mph and if Manfred can get to the runway, he can take off without rolling an inch. His airspeed is 45 and groundspeed is zero. It is not necessary to have any groundspeed to fly, just airspeed. Conversely, if Manfred has a lot of runway and nothing to hit, and takes off downwind in a 25 mph tailwind, the propeller will have to accelerate the airplane to a zero airspeed, which will be a 25 mph groundspeed, and then on to a 45 mph airspeed, which will have him humming across the ground at 70 mph. The speed over the ground, or a conveyor belt, when an airplane takes off is irrelevant; all that matters is its speed through the air, and unless the pilot sets the brakes, a moving conveyor belt -- under the freely turning wheels -- cannot stop the process of acceleration.

    Things eventually calmed down as the number of "it won't fly" folks dwindled as they began to understand that the airplane would take off. Old Hack looked at me and suggested we depart as the few holdouts showed no sign of changing their position. So, we headed out into the night to watch the guys take the conveyor out and reinstall the runway.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  20. #100
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Thats different though becuase that is a propeller plane. The propeller is used to pull air toward it. The question is what i am getting at. If you put a Boeing 747 in a closed huge facility with no wind, then placed it on a mile long belt then tried to get it to move it would stand still. The question states that if the belt could match the speed on the plane for every increase then the plane would sit in the same spot. EVEN though the thrust is pushing the air, there is no wind under the wings to pull the wheels off the ground, so there for the plane is being guided by its wheels. If the thrust pushes the plane forward on a runway then the plane would speed up to the point where there was enough lift under the wings to get it off the ground. But in this situation there is no lift under the wings so there for the wheels are holding the plane to the ground. So really the belt is moving at the same speed on the thrust which the wheels are holding that thrust to the ground so there for it wouldnt go anywhere.

    But this situation is impossible becuase if this was possible the wheels would overheat and blow long before it could be tested.

  21. #101
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Thats different though becuase that is a propeller plane. The propeller is used to pull air toward it. The question is what i am getting at. If you put a Boeing 747 in a closed huge facility with no wind, then placed it on a mile long belt then tried to get it to move it would stand still. The question states that if the belt could match the speed on the plane for every increase then the plane would sit in the same spot. EVEN though the thrust is pushing the air, there is no wind under the wings to pull the wheels off the ground, so there for the plane is being guided by its wheels. If the thrust pushes the plane forward on a runway then the plane would speed up to the point where there was enough lift under the wings to get it off the ground. But in this situation there is no lift under the wings so there for the wheels are holding the plane to the ground. So really the belt is moving at the same speed on the thrust which the wheels are holding that thrust to the ground so there for it wouldnt go anywhere.

    But this situation is impossible becuase if this was possible the wheels would overheat and blow long before it could be tested.
    Grrrrrrrrrrrrr. No. SAME principle. Prop, jet engine, they are BOTH THE SAME! You are not getting this, I can see. The belt moves at the same speed as the jet. A jet's speed is measured by the air flow, NOT by the wheel speed. Understand this? Do you expect to keep a plane on the ground, not developing lift, when it is moving at 400mph!?!? I don't care of the conveyor belt is moving at 400mph. The fact is that the conveyor belt is moving on the ground and has NO affect on the air; something that the jet engine relies 100% on to develop thrust.

    The plane is going against the air while the conveyor belt is going against (what little bit) the wheels. Listen to me: THE WHEELS DO NOT DO ANYTHING BUT ALLOW FOR THE PLANE TO ROLL. That's it. The engine will provide thrust against the air. The conveyor belt has NOTHING to do with it (aside from drag on wheels that roll freely). The conveyor belt DOES NOT affect the air flow.

    So getting back to the plane on the conveyer belt - the wheels on the landing gear are there to minimise friction with the ground. That's all they do. The plane's engines provide thrust relative to the air, not the ground.

    The plane in air is like the swimmer in water. It doesn't matter whether the bottom of the pool or the conveyer belt is moving in the opposite direction to the swimmer or plane. The medium through which the plane flies or the swimmer swims is the key.

    Newtons Third law (for every action there is an equal and opposite action) is why you are thinking the plane won't move. But the acting force in the plane is the jet engine and not the wheels.

    [/thread]



    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  22. #102
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Read this again:

    A few moments later, the roaring Continental, spinning that wooden Sensenich prop, has accelerated the J-3 and Manfred to 25 mph indicated airspeed. He and the airplane are cruising past the cheering spectators at 25 mph, while the conveyor has accelerated to 25 mph eastbound, yet it still has no way of stopping the airplane's movement through the air. The wheels are spinning at 50 mph, so the noise level is a little high, but otherwise, the J-3 is making a normal, calm-wind takeoff.

    As the indicated airspeed passes 45 mph, groundspeed -- you know, relative to where all those spectators are standing beside the conveyor belt -- is also 45 mph. (At least that's what it says on Manfred's GPS. Being brought back to life seemed to create an insatiable desire for electronic stuff.) The conveyor is also at 45 mph, and the wheels are whizzing around at 90 -- the groundspeed plus the speed of the conveyor in the opposite direction.
    IT IS ALL ABOUT AIRSPEED! No airspeed = no conveyor belt movement.

    Speed for speed, remember? You cannot compare airspeed (plane) to groundspeed (conveyor belt) in this case. It is the fatal flaw of the original question.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  23. #103
    ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ RandomGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    18,981
    Rep Power
    150

    Default

    hrm... ruiner... why are we negating gravity?
    Just wondering... say the Airplane was afloat and in zero gravity conditions then the wheels on the turner would have no effect right?

    But there are 2 forces on the plane, the force of gravity down and the force of the thrust forward.... Right?

    hrm i dont know my logic is likely wrong, but it seems like the plane would NOT lift off.

  24. #104
    GSXTACY SilverJester's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Acworth
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,544
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Ok I read the first 4 pages and got tired of reading. So here's the answer...
    The plane is not going to take off. The plane needs air flowing under it's wings to take off. The only way to achieve that is by moving at a certain speed. The speed is not calculated like a car's speedo (that's pseduo speed)....speed is distance/time. The plane moves 1 foot, the conveyor belt has moved 1 foot in the opposite direction.....thus it distance is 0; 0 distance divided by however long it would have taken to move 1 foot = 0 speed. The matchbox car on the treadmill example doesn't work, speed is distance/time no matter what is propelling the plane, the wheels or the jet engine, it irrelevant because it's speed si going to be matched by the convyor belt.

  25. #105
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    SilverJester adn RandomGyuy thank you thats what i was getting at. Three is no air flow under the wings so there is no lift, there-for gravity is holding the plane to the ground and the blet is matching the speed of the thrust. So in this question the wheels are the key factor, untill they are off the ground they are the things holding this plane to the ground. The thrust is jsut what is moving the plane but with theblet going in the opposite direction the plane is not going anywhere sothere for there is no air flow under the wings!

  26. #106
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RandomGuy
    hrm... ruiner... why are we negating gravity?
    Just wondering... say the Airplane was afloat and in zero gravity conditions then the wheels on the turner would have no effect right?

    But there are 2 forces on the plane, the force of gravity down and the force of the thrust forward.... Right?

    hrm i dont know my logic is likely wrong, but it seems like the plane would NOT lift off.
    I did NOT negative gravity. That falls into the "drag" that I was talking about. It will "lift" when there is enough forward thrust. No matter have fast the conveyor belt is spinning backwards, once the plane gets enough forward thrust, it will take off. The conveyor belt would have no way to keep that down as it is only spinning the wheels while the thrust is working on the air.
    Last edited by Ruiner; 12-10-2005 at 11:07 AM.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  27. #107
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    SilverJester adn RandomGyuy thank you thats what i was getting at. Three is no air flow under the wings so there is no lift, there-for gravity is holding the plane to the ground and the blet is matching the speed of the thrust. So in this question the wheels are the key factor, untill they are off the ground they are the things holding this plane to the ground. The thrust is jsut what is moving the plane but with theblet going in the opposite direction the plane is not going anywhere sothere for there is no air flow under the wings!
    NO! Why are you not listening to me? The belt ONLY affects the rate at which the wheels spin. If the plane is on a NORMAL runway that doesn't move, it will "ride" on the ground until it gets enough thrust (air over the wings) to generate lift. Now, if the runway is moving under it (conveyor belt), that DOES NOT matter.

    It goes back to the swimmer in the swimming pool example. The belt DOES NOT affect the airflow. Can you understand this? The conveyor belt is not really able to affect the plane as the wheels roll freely.

    Let me restate this:
    - wheels roll freely
    - wheels are the ONLY contact that the conveyor belt has with the plane
    - gravity acts on the plane the same no matter if the runway is moving or not
    - the conveyor belt DOES NOT affect the air
    - thrust is acting against the air and the conveyor belt is acting against the wheels; which roll freely!
    - once the engines get enough forward thrust, it WILL move forward.

    Explain this to me:WHAT will keep the plane from moving forward?!?!? WHAT??? If the wheels are allowed to roll freely, WHAT will keep it from moving forward in terms of the conveyor belt?
    Last edited by Ruiner; 12-10-2005 at 11:17 AM.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  28. #108
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Dude there is no air flow nder the wings so there is no lift so there for the plane goes nowhere. If they start at the same speed and the plane thrust is started that is what pushed the plane forward, but at the same time the belt starts moving, there for the wheels are the only thing moving. The thrust is what accl. the plane, but if the wheels move at the same speed as the as the thrust can push it (this is on the ground the whole time) and there is no air flow under the wings (remember this is not outside where hte wind can pick up) then the plane will not lift or move forward!

  29. #109
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Dude there is no air flow nder the wings so there is no lift so there for the plane goes nowhere. If they start at the same speed and the plane thrust is started that is what pushed the plane forward, but at the same time the belt starts moving, there for the wheels are the only thing moving. The thrust is what accl. the plane, but if the wheels move at the same speed as the as the thrust can push it (this is on the ground the whole time) and there is no air flow under the wings (remember this is not outside where hte wind can pick up) then the plane will not lift or move forward!

    Explain this to me: WHAT will keep the plane from moving forward if there is forward thrust?!?!? WHAT??? Gravity? Yes, but that can be overcome as you and I both know. Drag on the wheels? It is very small, as they are free-rolling, but that is easily overcome. Weight of the plane? With enough forward thrust, that is negated as well, hence lift. If the wheels are allowed to roll freely, WHAT will keep it from moving forward in terms of the conveyor belt? How much force can the conveyor belt put on the plane? How much? If the plane has 300lbs of forward thrust, how much force can the conveyor belt, via the FREE ROLLING wheels, put on the plane?

    Just answer me that.
    Last edited by Ruiner; 12-10-2005 at 11:27 AM.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  30. #110
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruiner
    Explain this to me: WHAT will keep the plane from moving forward if there is forward thrust?!?!? WHAT??? Gravity? Yes, but that can be overcome as you and I both know. Drag on the wheels? It is very small, as they are free-rolling, but that is easily overcome. Weight of the plane? With enough forward thrust, that is negated as well, hence lift. If the wheels are allowed to roll freely, WHAT will keep it from moving forward in terms of the conveyor belt? How much force can the conveyor belt put on the plane? How much? If the plane has 300lbs of forward thrust, how much force can the conveyor belt, via the FREE ROLLING wheels, put on the plane?

    Just answer me that.
    Becuase the forward thrust is what gets the plane moving forwards. Now if the ground starts moving backwards then the plane is going to roll on the spot without moving forwards or backwards. The thrust is pretty much nothing more than accl. the thrust can push for all it was worth but with no air flow UNDEr the wings, the thrust pushes from behind the wings and back, so that stll produces no lift under the wings. There for the medium is the wheels. The example you used eariler about the two guys who tried the plane used is outside where there was still the slightest wing blowing and they used a propeller plane which wroduces a wind currect under the wings itself. A boeing does not it pushes itself forward, but if the ground under it goes nowhere then the plane goes nowhere.

  31. #111
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    Im not gonna read this all, but Ruiner is right, given this scenario it WILL TAKE OFF.

    My uncle flys for Delta, he said it will take off
    My father is a Mathmatician (he got all the good genes) and said it will take off.

    Interesting thing i was told , my uncle who flys for delta is a WWII historian as well, and he tld me something i thought was pretty cool. In WWII the old Biplanes, well, when they were on an aircraft carrier traveling at XXspeed. he said when the planes took off, they would actually almost immiedietly take flight due to the aircraft being in motion, and the wind coming across the Deck of the ship.

    something to think about
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  32. #112
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TransAxle
    Becuase the forward thrust is what gets the plane moving forwards. Now if the ground starts moving backwards then the plane is going to roll on the spot without moving forwards or backwards. The thrust is pretty much nothing more than accl. the thrust can push for all it was worth but with no air flow UNDEr the wings, the thrust pushes from behind the wings and back, so that stll produces no lift under the wings. There for the medium is the wheels. The example you used eariler about the two guys who tried the plane used is outside where there was still the slightest wing blowing and they used a propeller plane which wroduces a wind currect under the wings itself. A boeing does not it pushes itself forward, but if the ground under it goes nowhere then the plane goes nowhere.
    Birthday:
    July 21, 1987

    You are talking to a college grad with many classes in physics and theory. Trust me on this, okay?

    Do you know how jet engines work? A jet engine is like a prop, just with a TON of blades (I am simplifying this to an extent).




    Here is your fallacy:

    Becuase the forward thrust is what gets the plane moving forwards. Now if the ground starts moving backwards then the plane is going to roll on the spot without moving forwards or backwards.
    The plane does not care about the ground. It only acts on the air. It DOES NOT care what the ground is doing IF it has free-rolling wheels. The AIR is what it cares about. If it can put force on the AIR, it will move forward. The wheels do not come into play as they are free-rolling! The conveyor belt can ONLY act on the wheels. However, I just told you that the plane does not care about the wheels. Thus, it does not care about the conveyor belt.

    I asked you this earlier:

    How much force can the conveyor belt put on the plane? How much? If the plane has 300lbs of forward thrust, how much force can the conveyor belt, via the FREE ROLLING wheels, put on the plane?




    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  33. #113
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    the answer is , the conveyor belt cant give any force against a free rolling wheels. that is the flaw in most peoples logic
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  34. #114
    When negotiations fail... Ruiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,631
    Rep Power
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vteckidd
    the answer is , the conveyor belt cant give any force against a free rolling wheels. that is the flaw in most peoples logic
    Exactly, sir. That is why I bolded that same question about "how much force can the conveyor belt put on the plane" in the question above your statement. He just doesn't get it.
    AIM: RuinerTT
    2005 Nissan Pathfinder LE

  35. #115
    ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ RandomGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    18,981
    Rep Power
    150

    Default

    i c i knew i was wrong just wanted to know why... i c now, now if the plane were propelled by the wheels in relative to the ground, itd be a different story but thats not how it works... it makes sense... just a great scenario... surprised they never went over this scenario in physics

  36. #116
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    maybe this will help:

    I object only stays stationary when an EQUAL amount of force is applied in the opposite direction. Like a Dyno for instance, A car is moving 100mph, the car is being PULLED by ITS wheels. THe force is between the wheels and the Roller. A jet is not, a 747 is being PUSHED by its ENGINE. there is no force from the wheels of a jet.

    Im also willing to bet if we didnt strap a car down on our dyno, if you did a pull it woul go forward, and jump off, the roller prob cant match the wheel speed fast enough, which is why cars are anchored down. to keep the forward motion from happening.

    People cant get past the "well the plane is going one way, and the conveyor belt is going the other way, so its not moving therefor no wind happens." this is simply not true, the plane will move because NO MATTER HOW FAST THE CONVEYOR BELT TRAVELS, the force of the Plane being propelled by its engine will overcome the belts speed in relation to the planes wheels. then there will be forward motion, which will creat wind, which creates lift thrust etcetcetc.

    /thread
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  37. #117
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    LOL i was just going by a Physics Professor answer to this. I just still believe that this question is impossible to prove. No matter what knowledge you may have i would still bet that if it was possible to prove this in a real live situation, i would still bet it doesnt take off. You can leave it at that, i may be wrong, but i am the type of person where you would haev to show me to prove me wrong.

  38. #118
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    i understand where you are coming from, but the laws of physics prove its right that it will take off. its not rocket science, just a mind stumbler to most people.

    Did Einstein have to PROVE his theory of relativity, or was his math enough to solidify his conclusions.

    its all numbers man, and math DOESNT LIE
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  39. #119
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    True but math may not always be right, sometimes math may even over look the smallest thing that can make or break a theory. Odds are this will work but i would like to see it in action!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!