I didn't bring up anything about any club. You did as an example of how some cops are racist because they called you and 500 others "muchato". So if not to show how police are racists and wrong, why did you bring it up then?Originally Posted by FrnkPwrs
I'm not making any assumptions. I simply responded to what you said. You came up, without obviously knowing the whole story yourself, with a bunch of different possible "reasons" why this guy killed 3 people. I simply am telling you that there is NO EXCUSE OR REASON that will justify what he did. If you disagree, then tell me why.Slow down. Your making way too many assumptions about me. I have no problems with the law whatsoever. Check the window tint thread since half the board is now gone and look at my opinion of the police. Dont make assumptions that Im "an angry black man" or that Im thinking that all cops are out to get me because Im black." I know the job is one that is complex, but the truth it being a judge, jury, and executioner isnt part of the job description, and I dont know one cop who has been trained and is qualified to be all three.
I don't think I'm misunderstanding at all. Even a sentence later you admit that if an officer uses "slurs" while arresting someone, their "intentions" are questionable. I'm telling you instead of looking at it as half empty, look at it as half full. Why is the person being arrested in the first place? Does the officer calling them names change that? THAT is my point. The officer calling someone a name is no where near as bad, 99.9% of the time, as what the criminal being arrested DID. No, it doesn't make them calling people right, but neither does it negate the fact that someone was a criminal. Get it? In other words, it's smoke and mirrors. Kinda like a criminal wanting to sue a home owner because he cut himself on a window while he was burglarizing their house.......HUH??? How in the hell can someone blame something that happens to them while doing something WRONG on someone or something else. THAT is my point. Get it now?You are either making up your own words or misunderstanding mine. This topic was started on the race card. My point was if someone uses racist slurs in the process of an arrest, then their intetions look questionable. That was my point. Please quote where I said that its ok for someone to take a life based on being called names.
Actually, what else do you need to know?All im saying is we dont know shit. Nobody in here knows shit about the situation except for 3 bodies down.
He was not wanting to go to jail....that doesn't justify murder.
He was not wanting to go to trial.....that doesn't justify murder.
He was pissed at the world....that doesn't justify murder.
I still don't see ANY angle at which he was even remotely justified, nor do I see how you could defend him in any way since the facts that you do know will never be refuted or justified. I don't get it.
This guy was not sipping tea in front of his TV and the police came in guns blazing and shot at him for no reason......this guy was CHARGED with RAPE, KIDNAPPING, and a few other felonies. He was on the way to his day in court. Not the gallows. His day in court. He already had a mistrial once. He knows what they have against him and what they don't. All this is facts.
Now, how is it that anyone in their right mind can defend this guy when he was A: given his day(s) in court to defend himself, B: NOT treated like a criminal (he was out on bond and wearing his own clothes and walked into court on his own), C: instead of letting the system take it's course, he murders 3 INNOCENT PEOPLE, critically injures another, car-jacks 3 people, steals cars, runs from police, still in hiding, and all the while IF he's being persecuted wrongly HASN'T bothered to pick a phone and call someone to try and tell his side of the story.
Seems to me pretty open and shut.
You see it different? If so, how?





