Quote Originally Posted by David88vert View Post
In one situation, you have an individual initiating communications with a government agency specifically looking for benefits. They do not have to seek out those benefits, nor are under any obligation to continue to seek them, if a test of any type (written, chemical, etc) is a condition of receiving those benefits.
Collecting a sample of urine, by the government is a search by law and a collection of evidence by law. There's no two ways about that. In order to search, you have to have reasonable suspicion, by law

Does the act of applying for welfare provide enough reasonable suspicion to warrant a suspicionless search?