Gun Question

[Vteckidd]

IMO

The argument needs to stick to the FACTS, the facts are that Banning or restricting guns solves NOTHING in regards to gun violence. NOTHING. There is study after study after study that proves it. Columbine happened during the AW Ban, it happened with low capacity mags IIRC, Newtown was committed by a person who STOLE a gun from a LEGAL owner. The laws they are proposing will not solve anything.

When you start arguing this "Need to protect my from da guberment" crap, 1) its not believable 2) it makes you sound like a conspiracy theorist 3) You lost that fight years ago when the govt invented Nukes and Drones and MOTHERFUCKING JET PLANES.

You have to convince an irrational portion of people that youre right, STICK TO RATIONAL PRACTICAL FACTS.

[Browning151]

When you start arguing this "Need to protect my from da guberment" crap, 1) its not believable 2) it makes you sound like a conspiracy theorist 3) You lost that fight years ago when the govt invented Nukes and Drones and MOTHERFUCKING JET PLANES.

You have to convince an irrational portion of people that youre right, STICK TO RATIONAL PRACTICAL FACTS.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any means, nor do I subscribe to the idea that they are going to come door to door taking weapons and each individual needs to be armed to fight them off, but when a government exerts its power to the point of becoming oppressive how do you stop it? Pitch forks and spades? Do you believe that the gov't of the U.S. can never reach the point of oppression that it needs to be overthrown? I'm not advocating that it needs to be done now, or even in any of our lifetimes, but that time may come sometime in the future and the rights that grant us the ability to do so need to be preserved. It's one of the founding principles of this country.