Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 62

Thread: hi

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default hi

    Just saying hi to all the Nissan owners in the Atl. Anybody else in here has a CA?

  2. #2
    Jay G. 1439/2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Location, Location...
    Posts
    6,375
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragingpanda
    Just saying hi to all the Nissan owners in the Atl. Anybody else in here has a CA?
    Hey I had one. It blew up though.

  3. #3
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragingpanda
    Just saying hi to all the Nissan owners in the Atl. Anybody else in here has a CA?
    I had one but it was soo damn slow. So I put a DOHC KA in.


  4. #4
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    you guys sound like the engine is not that worth it. hahaha. I don't know but my rwd CA is pretty much faster than my KA, but slower than most KA-T 240sx

  5. #5
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    Did you have a SOHC or DOHC 240?


  6. #6
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ...SOHC >.<

  7. #7
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    531
    Rep Power
    23

    Thumbs up

    welcome to the forum, i come on here to get laughs and stuff from all the ricers on this forum, don't expect to find much good info here...btw i suggest you check out all the various "teams" sites and get a good laugh lol->

    1997 fast n furious civic mods:

    engine:
    ebay intake
    racing spark plug wires
    green wire loom!
    Racing aluminum oil cap

    interior:
    Racing blue gauges
    Ebay plastic type R pedals
    Billet shift knob

    exterior:
    super racer ebay kit
    made in taiwan aluminum wing
    black steelies with the hubs kicked off
    wal-mart high performance tires

    suspension:
    weapon R super circuit racing coilovers
    chrome racing strut tower bar
    random blinging bars at random places

  8. #8
    a.k.a. s14slider
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in your closet
    Posts
    1,258
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yudalicious
    welcome to the forum, i come on here to get laughs and stuff from all the ricers on this forum, don't expect to find much good info here...btw i suggest you check out all the various "teams" sites and get a good laugh lol->

    1997 fast n furious civic mods:

    engine:
    ebay intake
    racing spark plug wires
    green wire loom!
    Racing aluminum oil cap

    interior:
    Racing blue gauges
    Ebay plastic type R pedals
    Billet shift knob

    exterior:
    super racer ebay kit
    made in taiwan aluminum wing
    black steelies with the hubs kicked off
    wal-mart high performance tires

    suspension:
    weapon R super circuit racing coilovers
    chrome racing strut tower bar
    random blinging bars at random places
    My boy Yuda is always cracking my ass up!

  9. #9
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragingpanda
    ...SOHC >.<
    Well there ya go.

    A stock CA is about the same as a DOHC 240.


  10. #10
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ^muwauahhaha....owned

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,024
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    i've never had a ca. i am the proud owner of an rb25 and an sr20. there is info to be had here, or rather people who know where the info is.
    "...I'm a thief, I'm a liar, There's my church, I sing in the choir..."

  12. #12
    No0b M0DERATOR auxiliary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    woodstock/alpharetta
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    ca's suck.

  13. #13
    akaDick em Down Tony PSINXS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    20 side of thangs
    Age
    40
    Posts
    11,782
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    ^

  14. #14
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    nothing is wrong with CA. If I want power in my 240 then I'd do KA-T but for everything else in between(mountain driving, autox, road course) CA is the way for me. I will never put a RB in my 240. As for SR...only if I can't have my CA or KA-T. DOn't get me wrong...all engines are great, just not for me. My CA makes more hp then dohc ka...unless you turbo it then i'll shut up. hahahaha

  15. #15
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    No seriously.

    Dyno a stock CA.

    I made 145 whp and 154 ft lbs of torque in my stock DOHC KA. CA's will be very close.


  16. #16
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    i know it's not a huge differ in stock form, but the CA will make more HP since it's a mother to get some good power out of NA KA. THe only way is to turbo it and like I said, KA-T is another topic....a beast. I hope the comment earlier "ca's suck" was a joke because it's far from it. Once again, if I go KA, Id turbo it.

  17. #17
    No0b M0DERATOR auxiliary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    woodstock/alpharetta
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    When I get rid of my stock t25 on my sr, do you want it?

  18. #18
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    oh so funny...another sr guy. That explained everything.

  19. #19
    Jay G. 1439/2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Location, Location...
    Posts
    6,375
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    he would be a ca guy but there isnt a bandwagon for those because they are slow.

  20. #20
    a.k.a. s14slider
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in your closet
    Posts
    1,258
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    hahahehe, you bastards crack my ass up. RagingPandanuts, I was an SR guy, well, I still have it now, and have had it for 2 and a half years now. I am just as happy with it now as I was the first day I drove it. You said you wanted to do a lot of mountain runs, auto-X, and all of that other bullshit, but an SR would have been a better choice due to its RELIABLITY, LIGHT WEIGHT (I am pretty sure it is the lightest motor you can put in a 240, beides an SR20DE, but you know what I am saying), and excellent response to modifications. There is a reason why there is a HUGE bandwagon for SR's now, but that is the sad, sad reason why I am selling all of my SR shit (including my immaculate 240 hatch w/type-x's, 56K original miles, SR20DET, damn it really is a nice car) and I know I will miss it. But, I want to start something new again. What will it be? who the fuck knows. I guess the point to this long-ass post is: CA's SUCK! hehehehehe

  21. #21
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by s14slider
    hahahehe, you bastards crack my ass up. RagingPandanuts, I was an SR guy, well, I still have it now, and have had it for 2 and a half years now. I am just as happy with it now as I was the first day I drove it. You said you wanted to do a lot of mountain runs, auto-X, and all of that other bullshit, but an SR would have been a better choice due to its RELIABLITY, LIGHT WEIGHT (I am pretty sure it is the lightest motor you can put in a 240, beides an SR20DE, but you know what I am saying), and excellent response to modifications. There is a reason why there is a HUGE bandwagon for SR's now, but that is the sad, sad reason why I am selling all of my SR shit (including my immaculate 240 hatch w/type-x's, 56K original miles, SR20DET, damn it really is a nice car) and I know I will miss it. But, I want to start something new again. What will it be? who the fuck knows. I guess the point to this long-ass post is: CA's SUCK! hehehehehe
    ca is lighter and sits lower in the engine bay my friend. It can rev up to 8000rpm without breaking anything, I dare to see the SR do that on stock format. Those characteristics are perfect for my mountain runs, autox, and "bullshits". Since when CA is a high maintainence engine. If you putting down 300whp+ on your SR, then you shouldn't be telling me about good reliability unless you deal with the valvetrain. How CA isn't excellent response to modifications when it can keep up with the SR with the same mods even though it's about 15hp less in stock form. Do you even know CA at all? You owned or experienced one before? What an intellectual way to determine an engine, based on the bandwagon. I guess you used to have a riced out civic also huh?
    You know yuda right? He's my close friend and the only person he trusts going to the mountain with...I'm still looking for a reason why he's your friend. Are you the guy that rear-ended someone?If so...i'm searching even harder for a reason.
    Last edited by ragingpanda; 07-27-2005 at 10:40 AM.

  22. #22
    a.k.a. s14slider
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in your closet
    Posts
    1,258
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragingpanda
    ca is lighter and sits lower in the engine bay my friend. It can rev up to 8000rpm without breaking anything, I dare to see the SR do that on stock format. Those characteristics are perfect for my mountain runs, autox, and "bullshits". Since when CA is a high maintainence engine. If you putting down 300whp+ on your SR, then you shouldn't be telling me about good reliability unless you deal with the valvetrain. How CA isn't excellent response to modifications when it can keep up with the SR with the same mods even though it's about 15hp less in stock form. Do you even know CA at all? You owned or experienced one before? What an intellectual way to determine an engine, based on the bandwagon. I guess you used to have a riced out civic also huh?
    You know yuda right? He's my close friend and the only person he trusts going to the mountain with...I'm still looking for a reason why he's your friend. Are you the guy that rear-ended someone?If so...i'm searching even harder for a reason.
    Chill man. I am only fucking with you. I really don't give a damn what you put in your car, what you do with your car, or anything. And no, I have NEVER owned a riced out civic. I think I know who you are now. Don't take my shit seriously, I am just throwing words on here to fuck around with people. What was your name again? I think you came to my house one time with either Yuda, Kamau, Paul, hell I can't remember. When is the next time anybody is going up to the mountains? I have not been on a mountain run in a WHILE. The only reason anybody else is fucking with you is cuz of personal preference. That is the only reason the KA-T vs. SR battles are ALWAYS going on. Either way, if something makes the power that you want, then it is fine with me. I wanna see it when you get done, and if you need any help, just let me know.

    BTW, are you 100% positive that the CA weighs less? I have seriously never researched that, so I don't know. I have never had a reason to fuck with a CA when I have had my SR for a couple years now. Anyways, I think I am done for now. Oh well, see ya later bitches!

    -Brandon

  23. #23
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    fast or slow is all depends on the owner. Can he/she tune it or not and how much money he's/she's willing to spend. The only reason you don't see tons of CA with high ass HP is because most of the owners are pretty much satisfied with around 250whp. What the hell am I going to do with a 300whp+ on a car for autoX and mountain run with only 2500lbs.. There is something called too much power...if you're into drag racing then there isn't but you get my drift. But if you want some high hp ca's, there are several out there if you're willing to search because that engine is made for serious tuning.

    Go to CA section on http://www.nico.com and see what I mean. I'm glad there isn't a bandwagon for CA, because it would be gay to have a bunch of import tuner's readers instead of people that actually researched .

  24. #24
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    No I'm pretty sure people don't get 300+ out of CAs because they can't not because they don't want to.


  25. #25
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    there's a guy in kennesaw with one. You want to visit him?

    This thread if turning from me simply saying hi to another one about ca vs sr, and not once did I said CA is better. You guys simply cannot accept the CA being as good or better, not because of facts. That just showed you spent more time typing than thinking. The reason why SR is so popular isn't because it's the BEST out there but because it's the current/newer one. Just because the media didn't concentrate on an engine that's 15 yrs old don't mean it's not just as good. That means you guys think toyota 22R is a POS also.
    Last edited by ragingpanda; 07-27-2005 at 10:25 AM.

  26. #26
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    531
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    SRs suck CAs rule... but the D16 > all.

  27. #27
    Unknown
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    This thread is cracking me up b/c everyone is saying the CA sucks but wont even bother to explain why it "suppoably" sucks, with that said it leaves to be that you guys really dont know why it sucks your just spewing garbage. Now lets get down to some facts.

    The SR is not the lightest motor dont be fooled by the aluminum block crap, the SR is actually 40 lbs heavier than the CA18DET. The CA is a 1.8l as the SR is 2.0 189cc doesnt make that much of a difference. The CA head design is amazing and the SR head is garbage, SR suck in higher rpm's and will cause a problem thats called Valve Float again due to the crappy head design. Why does the SR produce 205 hp simple b/c it has a bigger turbo than the CA. After numerous people putting on SR T25 turbos on there CA's they produce the exact HP hmmm amazing huh.

    Alright lets break it down price wise as well these prices wont include things to spend on such as intercooler, piping, exhaust, just parts for motor performance.
    Aight my CA was $950 included everything harness, tranny, motor, turbo etc etc.
    SR20 usually go for $1900-$2300 for a normal S13 red top.
    That leaves me with about $1000-$1400 to spend due to the savings.
    Well lets see I could spend $150 for a SR T25 and since it bolts right up to the CA manifold no problems, so thats 205 hp for the CA now hmmm for $1100 I now have the same power as the SR but with all the benefits that the CA has such as better head and block and higher revs. say I dont want the SR T25 I could go with a T3/T04E for $350 from Garrett, external wastegate $200, 550cc Injectors $200, FPR $100, Fuel pump $90, $20-$200 tuning either Rom Tune or Mega Squirt, $30 for Z32 MAF or $0 since Megasquirt uses and comes with a Map sensor, T3 manifold $179

    Thats $1169-$1319 and with all that, will produce a CA with about 320-340 WHP.
    so in total thats about $2000 for a CA then add in like $600 for things you need to complete the swap such as intercooler, exhaust, parts, gasket, lines, fluids, etc etc so $2600 to swap in a CA with 330whp oh yea those prices dont include clutch b/c my motor came with a Nismo Stage 2 clutch so it will handle that hp, but add another $200-$300 for clutch as well.

    BTW it takes more money to produce 300+whp for a SR than a CA and its easier on the CA.

    Also the stock CA's internals can handle 500whp if done properly and tuned properly, and yes its been done before numerous times. So far the record for a CA is around 750+ whp. Now tell me again why the CA sucks?

  28. #28
    HIV+ HalfBaked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,345
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pumaking
    Also the stock CA's internals can handle 500whp if done properly and tuned properly, and yes its been done before numerous times. So far the record for a CA is around 750+ whp. Now tell me again why the CA sucks?

    Prove it.


    Also, that car is kennesaw made what 302? And he is selling it...It's a t3/t4 right? I bet that car is fun off while you are off boost...


  29. #29
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    531
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    see panda I told you this forum sucks; with the exception of a few, no one knows what they're talking about and they rather fight over retarded shit like whose 16 second civic is faster (actually quite entertaining, gotta love them e-thugs)... I just noticed there was an ad banner for "ekletic genes"... just when I thought this forum couldn't get any lower, what kinda car forum has sponsorship from a clothing company lol.

    yea Brandon we should def go up again, I have been very busy with the MCAT, how's everyone doing? I haven't spoked to any of them for awhile.

  30. #30
    Unknown
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HalfBaked
    Prove it.


    Also, that car is kennesaw made what 302? And he is selling it...It's a t3/t4 right? I bet that car is fun off while you are off boost...

    Gash I hate people like you I'm not gonna spoon feed you, but I will reply this.

    These Videos are the CA powered S13 in Japan in the video the car was producing 680whp this was over a year ago the car is now over 750.

    http://www.pb-addict.com/~modaccess/CA18DET.wmv

    http://www.pb-addict.com/~modaccess/ca18det1.wmv


    As for the 500hp on stock internals go to www.sxoc.com and NICO and search for it.

    As for the CA on a T3/T4 whats wrong depending on the size of the compressor and turbine the t3/T4 will hit full boost in 2800-3200 rpm's if its not fun before it hits full boost what makes you think the SR will be on the same turbo, come on man think before you speak seriously your making a fool of yourself. Dont forget the SR N/A and CA N/A only have like 10hp difference.

  31. #31
    No0b M0DERATOR auxiliary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    woodstock/alpharetta
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pumaking
    Gash I hate people like you I'm not gonna spoon feed you, but I will reply this.

    These Videos are the CA powered S13 in Japan in the video the car was producing 680whp this was over a year ago the car is now over 750.

    http://www.pb-addict.com/~modaccess/CA18DET.wmv

    http://www.pb-addict.com/~modaccess/ca18det1.wmv


    As for the 500hp on stock internals go to www.sxoc.com and NICO and search for it.

    As for the CA on a T3/T4 whats wrong depending on the size of the compressor and turbine the t3/T4 will hit full boost in 2800-3200 rpm's if its not fun before it hits full boost what makes you think the SR will be on the same turbo, come on man think before you speak seriously your making a fool of yourself. Dont forget the SR N/A and CA N/A only have like 10hp difference.
    There are video's of SR's doing the same thing.

    Will my SR be like that? --No.
    Will your CA be like that?--No.

  32. #32
    Rx7 Drift / EF grip Kalifornia087's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oakwood.
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,037
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    yeah i talked to a guy at SFS3 who had a black SE coupe with a CA18det in it, and his son had an SR... he admitted it was not as fast, and he was going to go SR, but the CA was about 1000 to 1500 bux cheaper... im getting a 240 soon and may be thinking about CA next year because it is easier to save up for... also he noted that it would beat KA's (n/a) all day
    FC - Death by rotary forever
    CRX daily... Gas prices suck, i love my HF

  33. #33
    Osaka Sokutatsu mocha latte cupcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    i'm a got dang wallaby!!
    Age
    41
    Posts
    21,322
    Rep Power
    54

    Default

    Hey hey hey now.... there is nothing wrong with RB's.... sigh ok so they break alot... but yeah i got love for the CA.

  34. #34
    a.k.a. s14slider
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in your closet
    Posts
    1,258
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    YUDA!!! Damn, keep up the good work in school. I am in the middle of a fabrication course and suspension setup/geometry. F1 cars are fun as fuck to work on, but there are too many damn Nascar pieces getting in the way!! Everybody else is doing good for now. Nobody really heads up to the mountains these days anymore, I guess everyone is just too busy. I head up there every now and then just to have some peace, I hate people in case you did not know this already. Hit me up sometime and we all can head up to Blood Mtn. sometime.

    -Brandon

  35. #35
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I"m not trying to start anything with anybody so if I offended you somehow...i didn't mean to...especially S14Slider. Yes, even though CA has iron block it's lighter than SR. Let's put everything aside and get along.*hold hands around a fire*...wtf...that's pretty gay...nm

    I have no problem with anybody picking any engine because like I said, they're all great. Hell, if I have like four 240sx's i would do them all:CA,SR,KA-T,RB. All about personal preferences my friends.

    The problem that got me off is when people be dissing another engine even though they don't know shit about it. CA vs N/A KA is a joke...unless it's a freaky NA build up then oh yes...me like.

  36. #36
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Age
    49
    Posts
    61
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    No"seriously.

    Dyno a stock CA.

    I made 145 whp and 154 ft lbs"of torque in my stock DOHC KA. CA's will be very close.

    That's a remarkable KA or corrected numbers then. Stock DOHC KA is right around 125-130 whp, little"more torque. This fits closely"with the typical 15%-20% drivetrain losses one would expect witj a RWD vehicle (as stock KA is rated at 155 hp, 160 tq flywheel+

  37. #37
    No0b M0DERATOR auxiliary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    woodstock/alpharetta
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,171
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    I was just saying that that CA has a lot of power, but are you really going to make a car like that?

    Just like I could post a video to a 700 hp SR, but am I going to have one?--No.

  38. #38
    Unknown
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    again you guys yield to provide any info to back your claims up. Facts speak louder than your stupidity, Auxiliary no you didnt say the CA has a lot of power you keep saying it sucks, Of course im not going to have a 700hp car b/c 1 I dont need one, 2 the turbo alone is insanely expensive, 3 I know that I cant handle 700hp and no one else on this forum can. Auxiliary please post that 700hp sr cause so far I havent seen it yet with a clip of the dyno sheet. .

    1439/2000 I already proved my point, you asked me to prove the 700hp CA and 500 hp on stock internals easy go search on Nico and Sxoc numerous people on sxoc have done it. You asked for it I presented it. You feel the SR is better but again you havent explain the reasons why they are better but than again there isnt much to explain as there isnt any, please dont give me its got a timing chain bullshit theres a reason why the RB and VG motors are designed after the CA, there is a reason some of Nissan's earlier engine designers say the SR was designed so horribly and cheaply. You know why the CA was discontinued not b/c it sucked or didnt perform well quite the opposite it was b/c it was designed so extremly well that it cost to much to produce and thus the SR20 was born dont forget usually when a company is doing bad they'll skimp on things for example the SR. But whatever I'm sure you knew all that. I'm done with this forum nothing but fucking idiots and retards.

  39. #39
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    The purpose of this thread is to find fellow Nissan owners in ATL. Instead I got a bunch of Nissan retards. You guys just simply told me CA sucks for no reason whatsoever. Was my thread about "CA is better than SR?" No.

    Then I provided some basic knowledge to show that CA might not be better but just as good in case you're all sensitive. Pumaking then provided informations and clips to show that the engine is just as good and you guys missed the point completely. 3 pages already and still no hard facts from the guys that said CA sucks. tsk tsk tsk....this is new level of retardation. I just want all of us to fuckin get along and have respect for all engines...wtf.
    Last edited by ragingpanda; 07-28-2005 at 01:10 AM.

  40. #40
    IA Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    41
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boost_boy
    Man, some of those fols are real knuckle heads . I see a bunch of ignorant kids who just don't know any better. I refuse to entertain them, but you quote me: After 16 years of wrenching on nissans, 9 years of toying with the CA series, 7 years of wrencing on SRs, 6 years of wrenching on KAs, and honorable mentions are the VG sereies as well as the RB and the GA, the SR is the cheapest built and the worst designed of the bunch. The KA is also an attempt by nissan to try and build cheap low maintenance engines by using timing chains and big displacement bores to make torque and hp, and for the most part it worked. It worked at the expense of reliability, difficulty of servicing, and cost of repair. If you've never owned a CA or owned one and blew it up, that's your fault. Srs blow-up all the time, spit-up rocker arms like a 1 month old baby does his/her formula, and have many owners on these forums combing for answeres to their dilemmas.
    One would have to ask, why isn't the RB series, which is nissan's pride and joy as well as the VG series, designed with timing chains and rocker arms? The SR and KA was designed in era where our beloved nissan company was having major financial troubles. If you're broke, you're going to do things a little more conservatively. That explains the massive market for afternarket parts for both the KA, SR, and all honda engines "They Need it" . Last I remember, the RB and VG series resembles that of the CA. We even share the same oil filter, coil packs, and the same theory from factory. The SR is on it's on with borrowed technology from the CA and other nissan predecessors who have paved the way for the SR.

    So if CAs suck, then the SR ain't nothing but a much cheaper deep throater. The CA is what it is 'An icon' that you new school SR jocks need not look down on. With my CA powered sentras, I've whacked many SR/haltech powered SE-R's as well as 240s, so it's not what you got, but who's got it. And I drive around with better than 350hp with A/C, p/s, and a full interior. I'm not saying SRs suck, but in the hands of scrubs, it's just another nissan engine to me.

    P.S. pass it on to your local forum..................

    Dee
    comment by a moderator in the CA forum on nico.com If you have a problem with him, register and call him out if you dare.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!