hi

[ragingpanda]

hahahehe, you bastards crack my ass up. RagingPandanuts, I was an SR guy, well, I still have it now, and have had it for 2 and a half years now. I am just as happy with it now as I was the first day I drove it. You said you wanted to do a lot of mountain runs, auto-X, and all of that other bullshit, but an SR would have been a better choice due to its RELIABLITY, LIGHT WEIGHT (I am pretty sure it is the lightest motor you can put in a 240, beides an SR20DE, but you know what I am saying), and excellent response to modifications. There is a reason why there is a HUGE bandwagon for SR's now, but that is the sad, sad reason why I am selling all of my SR shit (including my immaculate 240 hatch w/type-x's, 56K original miles, SR20DET, damn it really is a nice car) and I know I will miss it. But, I want to start something new again. What will it be? who the fuck knows. I guess the point to this long-ass post is: CA's SUCK! hehehehehe

ca is lighter and sits lower in the engine bay my friend. It can rev up to 8000rpm without breaking anything, I dare to see the SR do that on stock format. Those characteristics are perfect for my mountain runs, autox, and "bullshits". Since when CA is a high maintainence engine. If you putting down 300whp+ on your SR, then you shouldn't be telling me about good reliability unless you deal with the valvetrain. How CA isn't excellent response to modifications when it can keep up with the SR with the same mods even though it's about 15hp less in stock form. Do you even know CA at all? You owned or experienced one before? What an intellectual way to determine an engine, based on the bandwagon. I guess you used to have a riced out civic also huh?
You know yuda right? He's my close friend and the only person he trusts going to the mountain with...I'm still looking for a reason why he's your friend. Are you the guy that rear-ended someone?If so...i'm searching even harder for a reason.