View Poll Results: How should I change the stance

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Raise the front

    1 2.78%
  • Lower the rear

    2 5.56%
  • Lower both

    34 94.44%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 108 of 108

Thread: Lowered the rear and lightened the front

  1. #81
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swollix View Post
    Your wheels are way to skinny, I have 315's son. I think my fronts are wider than your rears at 275....

    GTFO.
    I miss my 275(f)315(r) ZR1s
    I actually tried to get some, but no one wanted my last wheels in a trade. lol
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  2. #82
    IA Hater/Shit Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,393
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    GTFO.
    I miss my 275(f)315(r) ZR1s
    I actually tried to get some, but no one wanted my last wheels in a trade. lol

    well my wheels may be available for sale soon...


  3. #83
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swollix View Post
    well my wheels may be available for sale soon...

    Yummy. You have some sticky rears too (no pun, lulz).

    PM me when you're selling them, I might have to get them.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  4. #84
    Gods Chariot Vteckidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Atlanta Centennial Park
    Age
    44
    Posts
    33,102
    Rep Power
    71

    Default

    skinnies look retarded, id ditch them.

    Stance wise, welcome to camaros. Thats the way they are supposed to look. I like it id leave it. Id either get the factory optional lip kit, or bigger wheels.

    The skinnies in such a front end heavy car is dangerous on the street. You have little to almost no contact patch. Bet it drives like ass in the rain. be careful.

    Hell i had to drive my CRX in the rain today and on 205/50/15s it was scary. I cant imagine skinnys in a much much heavier front end car with only 2in of contact on the pavement.

    Id ditch them anyway , to me guys that ride on skinnies project this "im a badass fast car" attitude . unless the car can tote the front wheels down the 1/4 or sounds like its running on 3 cylinders, its a little domestic ricer imo.

    but hey if you like it...........
    Enterprise Data Resources- Ecommerce Project Manager
    -www.usedbarcode.net

  5. #85
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vteckidd View Post
    skinnies look retarded, id ditch them.

    Stance wise, welcome to camaros. Thats the way they are supposed to look. I like it id leave it. Id either get the factory optional lip kit, or bigger wheels.

    The skinnies in such a front end heavy car is dangerous on the street. You have little to almost no contact patch. Bet it drives like ass in the rain. be careful.

    Hell i had to drive my CRX in the rain today and on 205/50/15s it was scary. I cant imagine skinnys in a much much heavier front end car with only 2in of contact on the pavement.

    Id ditch them anyway , to me guys that ride on skinnies project this "im a badass fast car" attitude . unless the car can tote the front wheels down the 1/4 or sounds like its running on 3 cylinders, its a little domestic ricer imo.

    but hey if you like it...........

    They drive 10x better in the rain than the 275/40R17s did. LOL. I guess they cut through water instead of glide over it (I actually had to slow down to about 35mph on I-75 with the last wheels because they were making me involuntarily change lanes in the rain... lol).

    As far as traction wise on wet pavement, and not puddles, they're alright. I stay back in traffic, go the speed limit, and drive like I have skinnies and sense. It's worked out so far *knocks on wood*

    Like I said, it dropped the weight down considerably and I love the look. I'm not too worried what people think about it, most hate just because it's a Camaro. I grew up around them, to each their own.

    I still want your CRX, sir
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  6. #86
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    170
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    your wheels are terribly dated. your car would have been hot shit when it was new if you had that wheel/tire combo. however, it is 2009, and your car is stuck in 1996

  7. #87
    SHP Josh...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,128
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smote View Post
    your wheels are terribly dated. your car would have been hot shit when it was new if you had that wheel/tire combo. however, it is 2009, and your car is stuck in 1996
    function > form

    And your driving a civic, how on earth can you talk about something old and played out?
    Quote Originally Posted by xtquickgt00 View Post
    my car is an automatic my overdrive button wasnt working during the dyno i fixed it afterwards. i live out towards cartersville and me and ted were messig around the hole way to powder springs so he converter was hot also... after i dynoed it i puyt it back to stock and it felt stronger and my wheels bent on the pass. side hell fr what it was ying on th dyno ican still manage to get a 14.00 in the 1/4

  8. #88
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    44
    Posts
    347
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    I totally need big n lils with my manual rack goodness. You can has my Zr1's with the red lip!!! 17's should raise you up enough to lower it more.

    I dont see how its that low and not scraping everything. It looks like we have the same exaust and mine scrapes on the hwy right now. The rear of my car is lowered but the front isnt. My buddy had to run mufflers on the header in order to not scrape when his car was that low. IDK, maybe the LT1 header's are higher?

  9. #89
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smote View Post
    your wheels are terribly dated. your car would have been hot shit when it was new if you had that wheel/tire combo. however, it is 2009, and your car is stuck in 1996
    lol. You have a car that the body style started in 1996 (the only REAL difference being the front bumper and headlights), with what are those... Rota Subzeros? No, but really, I like your lip from 1999, your blue lug nuts from at least 4 years ago, and your swap that was done back in 1999. My favorite part is your carbon fiber hood, I didn't see that until this year, it must have just came out. I can't forget the "I <3 JDM" tag frame and "JDM" marker lights though.


    My Z28 might be "stuck in 1996" with a little function, but your civic is stuck in 1999 AND you're on the JDM nutswinging bandwagon... who is worse?

    Quote Originally Posted by jenson
    I totally need big n lils with my manual rack goodness. You can has my Zr1's with the red lip!!! 17's should raise you up enough to lower it more.

    I dont see how its that low and not scraping everything. It looks like we have the same exaust and mine scrapes on the hwy right now. The rear of my car is lowered but the front isnt. My buddy had to run mufflers on the header in order to not scrape when his car was that low. IDK, maybe the LT1 header's are higher?
    Do you have longtubes? I only have shorties, but I do scrape on a lot!

    New tires on the ZR1s? lol
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  10. #90
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Elbow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    29,397
    Rep Power
    66

    Default

    SLOW.

  11. #91
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by simontibbett View Post
    SLOW.

    ILY?
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  12. #92
    JDMSK8R JEY$JDM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NY 2 GA
    Age
    36
    Posts
    4,339
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Looks good

  13. #93
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    170
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    lol. You have a car that the body style started in 1996 (the only REAL difference being the front bumper and headlights), with what are those... Rota Subzeros? No, but really, I like your lip from 1999, your blue lug nuts from at least 4 years ago, and your swap that was done back in 1999. My favorite part is your carbon fiber hood, I didn't see that until this year, it must have just came out. I can't forget the "I <3 JDM" tag frame and "JDM" marker lights though.


    My Z28 might be "stuck in 1996" with a little function, but your civic is stuck in 1999 AND you're on the JDM nutswinging bandwagon... who is worse?



    Do you have longtubes? I only have shorties, but I do scrape on a lot!

    New tires on the ZR1s? lol
    mmmm that is an old picture (from about 3 yrs ago) the sidemarker are still on the car and so is the tag frame but that is about it. The hood is gone and so are the wheels (those things alone were worth as much as your car) However, my stuck in 1999 civic with a swap done in 1999 is faster than your POS f-body pile of parts from the GM-leftover-cavalier parts bin. Not to mention I can go around turns at more than 15mph and still 30+ mpg. So here it is 2009 and you have 10 years to catch up to my "1999" swap and you still look like a b-team reject.

    on a side ZO6 wheels or ZR1 wheels would be a vast improvement over what you have now

  14. #94
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smote View Post
    mmmm that is an old picture (from about 3 yrs ago) the sidemarker are still on the car and so is the tag frame but that is about it. The hood is gone and so are the wheels (those things alone were worth as much as your car) However, my stuck in 1999 civic with a swap done in 1999 is faster than your POS f-body pile of parts from the GM-leftover-cavalier parts bin. Not to mention I can go around turns at more than 15mph and still 30+ mpg. So here it is 2009 and you have 10 years to catch up to my "1999" swap and you still look like a b-team reject.

    on a side ZO6 wheels or ZR1 wheels would be a vast improvement over what you have now
    What do you run in the 1/4?

    Your wheels cost $5k?

    I get 25mpg... tunes are nice. I make 3 times your torque and only 5 mpg less

    Left over cavalier parts? That's like saying S2ks are left over parts from your piece of shit... they're totally different cars.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  15. #95
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    170
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    What do you run in the 1/4?

    Your wheels cost $5k?

    I get 25mpg... tunes are nice. I make 3 times your torque and only 5 mpg less

    Left over cavalier parts? That's like saying S2ks are left over parts from your piece of shit... they're totally different cars.
    lol@u everybody knows GM has corporate (interior) parts several diff. models use. It has been one of there downfalls for quite sometime. there are very few parts that interchange between a civic and s2k w/o major modifications. Now I ran 13.0's (on drag radials) about 2.5 years ago and earlier in the thread it was stated that your car runs 13.3's. Your car probably does make three times the torque of mine, it should the motor is 3x's the displacement, and furthermore big-fuckin-whoop, go pull a trailer then. so you have 3x's the motor only 2x's the weight (being generous) and run .3 slower with sacrificed drivability. and just to make this post on topic if you are so concerned with form over function why are you running cooper fuckin cobras on your "drag setup" wheels?

  16. #96
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smote View Post
    lol@u everybody knows GM has corporate (interior) parts several diff. models use. It has been one of there downfalls for quite sometime. there are very few parts that interchange between a civic and s2k w/o major modifications. Now I ran 13.0's (on drag radials) about 2.5 years ago and earlier in the thread it was stated that your car runs 13.3's. Your car probably does make three times the torque of mine, it should the motor is 3x's the displacement, and furthermore big-fuckin-whoop, go pull a trailer then. so you have 3x's the motor only 2x's the weight (being generous) and run .3 slower with sacrificed drivability. and just to make this post on topic if you are so concerned with form over function why are you running cooper fuckin cobras on your "drag setup" wheels?

    lol. Sorry, didn't know my black SS leather interior was from a cavalier, I missed that memo.

    I ran 13.3 spinning and not even running it out all the way, on radials 13.0 would be easy... I don't even have a motor swap. Shit, it's barely modded...LOL

    And if you think it's 2x your car's weight (generously...LOL), you're SORELY mistaken. Unless your car weighs around 1550 pounds
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  17. #97
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    170
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    you idiot, the "2x's the weight" statement was generous in your favor. goddamn I'm done with you, you aren't even smart enough to provide a good arguement.

  18. #98
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smote View Post
    you idiot, the "2x's the weight" statement was generous in your favor. goddamn I'm done with you, you aren't even smart enough to provide a good arguement.

    lol. 2x your weight in any way is dumb as fuck. What do you think it weighs?
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  19. #99
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    44
    Posts
    347
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Yup, Longtubes and TSP TD's. The driver side is so low...I think alot of it has to do with the design of their duals is more for hooker/jet hot style but Im running QTP's. I would have to agree that my interior (2001) is from a 1995 Cavalier, but the seating position and seats are so comfy for cruising.

    I have new tyres on the back (315 sumy HT's) and decent tread (65% left) on the front. But wait, you dont have radials on the rear?!? I have zero traction with the 315's right now, I assumed you had some radials on there son.

  20. #100
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenson View Post
    Yup, Longtubes and TSP TD's. The driver side is so low...I think alot of it has to do with the design of their duals is more for hooker/jet hot style but Im running QTP's. I would have to agree that my interior (2001) is from a 1995 Cavalier, but the seating position and seats are so comfy for cruising.

    I have new tyres on the back (315 sumy HT's) and decent tread (65% left) on the front. But wait, you dont have radials on the rear?!? I have zero traction with the 315's right now, I assumed you had some radials on there son.

    Yea, the longtubes and true duals (if I read that right) are killing your ground clearance. My buddy has hooker longtubes with custom true duals and he has the same problems.

    I have just regular tires all around. For extra I have some ET streets though I really don't know if I'd even get rid of the wheels, lol, I do want/need to sell the ET streets... if you know anyone that might be interested.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  21. #101
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    44
    Posts
    347
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Yea, but they make such great power and sound together...next year I'll have to go to boom tubes to clear the TA unless I can come up with enough cash for a MWC Fab9. Then I'll get my suspension right on big n lil's.

    There's no way I'd trade my setup for yours unless you had some radials on the back though. I'd have to do alot of grinding to make them fit + I'd be downgrading substantially in the tyre department. Right now I drive it everyday, 80 miles on the hwy, so ET streets would be used up in a week or so lol. Guess I just need to pick up some 315 radials for now.

    For you and your issue, why not get some 10 spokes. They are cheap 17's and the best looking stock wheel for a 4th gen IMO. I bought my last set with brand new tyres for $400.

  22. #102
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenson View Post
    Yea, but they make such great power and sound together...next year I'll have to go to boom tubes to clear the TA unless I can come up with enough cash for a MWC Fab9. Then I'll get my suspension right on big n lil's.
    Your car setup, with the mods, would be SICK all around.

    There's no way I'd trade my setup for yours unless you had some radials on the back though. I'd have to do alot of grinding to make them fit + I'd be downgrading substantially in the tyre department. Right now I drive it everyday, 80 miles on the hwy, so ET streets would be used up in a week or so lol. Guess I just need to pick up some 315 radials for now.
    Totally understandable
    To be honest, if I were you, I'd just get some stock 16" wheels and put slicks on them. Keep the streetability of your ZR1's, go to the track, and put on the slicks. No grinding, no going through tires from commuting, etc. Thacker said his car on 315 radials NEVER hooked.

    For you and your issue, why not get some 10 spokes. They are cheap 17's and the best looking stock wheel for a 4th gen IMO. I bought my last set with brand new tyres for $400.
    Oh, I love my wheels and setup. I have 6 stock wheels (2 from an LS1 car and 4 from my car stock) when I want to take the "drag wheels" off. I've just always loved the staggered 17x9/11 ZR1s as well.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  23. #103
    IA Hater/Shit Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,393
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Damn Honda owners.... Evan why you hating on your old crowd, lol?


  24. #104
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    44
    Posts
    347
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Prolly true, I had 315 BFG radials that hooked about as good as these sumy's. I was thinking some MT's would do it though. I just sold my 16's, figured they might hook a bit to much for the 10 bolt.

  25. #105
    aye bro .:Stirfry:.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warner Robins
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,344
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    so when we runnin evan

    ATL DAsquad Member #9

  26. #106
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swollix View Post
    Damn Honda owners.... Evan why you hating on your old crowd, lol?
    LOL. He started it. When I had a Civic, I never said someone had an outdated car... I mean, I knew I was in the most used and abused, commonly modded (good and bad) POS out there

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenson View Post
    Prolly true, I had 315 BFG radials that hooked about as good as these sumy's. I was thinking some MT's would do it though. I just sold my 16's, figured they might hook a bit to much for the 10 bolt.

    Something to think about. I'd hate to waste money on 315 radials that don't help. Know what I mean.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  27. #107
    IA Hater/Shit Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,393
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    LOL. He started it. When I had a Civic, I never said someone had an outdated car... I mean, I knew I was in the most used and abused, commonly modded (good and bad) POS out there

    Something to think about. I'd hate to waste money on 315 radials that don't help. Know what I mean.

    Mickey Thompson ET streets!


  28. #108
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swollix View Post
    Mickey Thompson ET streets!

    LOL WUT






    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!