View Poll Results: How should I change the stance

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Raise the front

    1 2.78%
  • Lower the rear

    2 5.56%
  • Lower both

    34 94.44%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 108

Thread: Lowered the rear and lightened the front

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default Lowered the rear and lightened the front

    Took about 40 pounds off the front and lowered the rear about 1/2" in effort to create a less raked stance. FAIL











    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  2. #2
    BA8 Squad member #1 Drummerboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    34
    Posts
    4,202
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    What'd you change on the front end? Battery relocation?

  3. #3
    sukanigadikosum DieselNuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    niggaville USA;via, Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    7,907
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    looks good. less rake, but still apparent. where did the 40lbs come from?

  4. #4
    Look Behind You !!! -EnVus-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Projects
    Posts
    8,743
    Rep Power
    35

    Default

    need to fix the crack bumper lense
    what motor is in it ?

  5. #5
    sukanigadikosum DieselNuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    niggaville USA;via, Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    7,907
    Rep Power
    32

    Default

    5.7 LT1

  6. #6
    IA Hater/Shit Talker
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,393
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Your poll is missing the option "set it on fire."


  7. #7
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swollix View Post
    Your poll is missing the option "set it on fire."

    I actually missed the "go fuck yourself" option.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  8. #8
    $LEEK PreludeVTEC01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    North Atlanta
    Posts
    679
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    I actually missed the "go fuck yourself" option.
    LOL

    My Flickr Page

  9. #9
    ...EXTERMINATE... cpearson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rome, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,629
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Looks good.
    “When convention and science offer us no answers, might we not finally turn to the fantastic as plausibility?” Spooky

  10. #10
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    lower it all around like an inch or so more.


  11. #11
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toxxxic View Post
    lower it all around like an inch or so more.
    Not. lol. I already scrape bad on the smaller speedbumps.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  12. #12
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    Not. lol. I already scrape bad on the smaller speedbumps.
    then what was the purpose of this thread?

    if you already scrape and say you wont go any lower, why would you ask?

    P.S. I dont see how the hell you're scraping... my coupes frame was 2 inches off the ground and I did just fine.


  13. #13
    Senior Member | IA Veteran ep9716's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norcross
    Posts
    5,290
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toxxxic View Post
    my coupes frame was 2 inches off the ground and I did just fine.
    That's what I'm saying..I'm About 2in off the ground also

  14. #14
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ep9716 View Post
    That's what I'm saying..I'm About 2in off the ground also
    i could probably fit my entire body under evan's car hahaha


  15. #15
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toxxxic View Post
    then what was the purpose of this thread?

    if you already scrape and say you wont go any lower, why would you ask?

    P.S. I dont see how the hell you're scraping... my coupes frame was 2 inches off the ground and I did just fine.

    The options are raise the front or lower the back. The front scrapes, not the back. The third option is to lower it all, if I did so, it'd be very minute.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  16. #16
    DA with a lil sumtin Dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Rome
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,899
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    i think it looks good the way it is. you dont need to lower a camaro too much, but it dont need to sit like a truck (stock).

  17. #17
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    i still dont understand why someone with a stock lt1 camaro rides around with skinnies on the front?

  18. #18
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach'N'U View Post
    i still dont understand why someone with a stock lt1 camaro rides around with skinnies on the front?

    I'm sorry, did you auto-x your Mach 1 with the wide wheels on the front? Did you race it with the modded motor?

    I like the look. I like the way it drives. I saved weight.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  19. #19
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    I'm sorry, did you auto-x your Mach 1 with the wide wheels on the front? Did you race it with the modded motor?

    I like the look. I like the way it drives. I saved weight.
    buhahahahahahaahahhahahah I had 17x8's on the front. your telling me you auto-x your car with 16x5's or what ever size skinny that is on the front? you must not do to good! also unless your car is capable of toting the front tires then you dont need them!

  20. #20
    Senior Member | IA Veteran Catnip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Age
    35
    Posts
    19,743
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mach'N'U View Post
    buhahahahahahaahahhahahah I had 17x8's on the front. your telling me you auto-x your car with 16x5's or what ever size skinny that is on the front? you must not do to good! also unless your car is capable of toting the front tires then you dont need them!

    You didn't understand what I said, apparently. I didn't say I auto-x'd. You asked why I rode around in a stock LT1 with skinnies, implying I don't drag race... meaning I have them for no reason (drag race = reason for skinnies). I asked if you if you auto-x'd because you had wide wheels on the front (auto-x/handling = reason for wide front wheels). Then I also brought up your motor because usually people race when they mod their motor.

    Sorry that was too deep for you.
    '92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx

  21. #21
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Let me help you since your to stupid to understand the way you asked something...

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    1. I'm sorry, did you auto-x your Mach 1 with the wide wheels on the front? 2. Did you race it with the modded motor?

    I like the look. I like the way it drives. I saved weight.
    1. I am asking why a stock LT1 car has skinnies in the front, and you ask me did I auto-x! Therefore implying that, I did not, so therefore thats why I dont understand you having skinnies in the front. Which are meant more for cars running 11 flat into the 10's! Or for all out drag cars. Neither of which are yours.

    2. Again I ask about tires you ask about racing a modded motor? Again I did some spirited driving, but unlike you I have a job and very very rarely had the chance to go to the track. Also my car was not capable of running extremely fast times or totting the front end, therefore I had zero use for skinnies in the front.

    Now onto this two digit IQ responce!

    Quote Originally Posted by Catnip View Post
    You didn't understand what I said, apparently. I didn't say I auto-x'd. 1 . You asked why I rode around in a stock LT1 with skinnies, implying I don't drag race... meaning I have them for no reason (drag race = reason for skinnies). 2. I asked if you if you auto-x'd because you had wide wheels on the front (auto-x/handling = reason for wide front wheels). 3. Then I also brought up your motor because usually people race when they mod their motor.

    Sorry that was too deep for you.
    1. My god did not know now that 13.3 qualified for needing skinnies and street tire combos! Thats some John Force shit right there!

    2. When did 17x8 become a "wide wheel"? Hell thats stock size, must mean all factory cars rim sizes are made for the intentions of auto-x'ing!

    2a. If wide tires are meant for handling and skinnies are meant for drag racing, you most be very dangerous driving around on the streets if your car lacks alot of handling from the lack of tire/rim size in the front.

    3. Refer to 2 at the top!

  22. #22
    ALL CAPS JITB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Lithonia
    Posts
    20,772
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    trade for hatch?

  23. #23
    The Philanthropist Dirty Octopus™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Staines
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,311
    Rep Power
    43

    Default

    damn. i wish i like these cars so i can understand what the fuck i'm lookin' at here

  24. #24
    Grocery Getter GetFRESH!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Columbus
    Age
    41
    Posts
    469
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dirty Octopus™ View Post
    damn. i wish i like these cars so i can understand what the fuck i'm lookin' at here
    Haha. I feel ya Kash.

  25. #25
    OMG! It's Dylan! qwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Milledgeville
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,366
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    looks good to me.

  26. #26
    Certified Gearhead WFOdime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kennesaw, GA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    231
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Thats one bitchin camaro
    1990 240sx hatch- sold
    1970 Datsun 510 2dr- l20b, 280zx pistons, hot cam, roadster 5-speed, 13in rims, and ajustable spring seats on the front.

  27. #27
    1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8 40th GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Suwanee, GA
    Age
    36
    Posts
    699
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    That's a good lookin Camaro. I always loved the f-bodies.

    I'd leave it as is. But for the sake of the poll I voted 'lower both.'

    Mine's the red one.

  28. #28
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    4x4 ? how do you drive onto a 4x4 ???


  29. #29
    Building Credit Bigt8aford's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    barrow
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,395
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    I say the car looks great as is. I would focus on truly putting some power down with that LT1, I believe that would be a IA first.




    "Yo son, u need 2 put dat chevy on some 4s wid a lil liff maine. An den get sum candy 4 it, den you have dat sh*t lukin rite"

  30. #30
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chevrolet View Post
    I say the car looks great as is. I would focus on truly putting some power down with that LT1, I believe that would be a IA first.
    fast intake, vindicator head/cam set up, tune and a 100 shot and he would run good enough to actually need those skinnies!

  31. #31
    SHP Josh...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,128
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chevrolet View Post
    I say the car looks great as is. I would focus on truly putting some power down with that LT1, I believe that would be a IA first.
    I really doubt that...
    Quote Originally Posted by xtquickgt00 View Post
    my car is an automatic my overdrive button wasnt working during the dyno i fixed it afterwards. i live out towards cartersville and me and ted were messig around the hole way to powder springs so he converter was hot also... after i dynoed it i puyt it back to stock and it felt stronger and my wheels bent on the pass. side hell fr what it was ying on th dyno ican still manage to get a 14.00 in the 1/4

  32. #32
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Who gives a fuck if he runs skinnies?!

    If he likes how they look then who gives a shit?

    You wanna hate on me for having a bunch of purple suspension goodies that I don't need because I dont race?

    Its his car, get the hell over it.


  33. #33
    Sneaker Freak Repiks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    35
    Posts
    473
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    I'd much rather run a wider front tire and be stable on turns instead of shaving a tenth or two off your et.

    --editEd to reduce drama bullshit
    03' Lightning w/ Bolt-Ons | KLR 650 | Duece.

  34. #34
    Public Enemy #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kennesaw
    Posts
    11,300
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Repiks View Post
    I'd much rather run a wider front tire and be stable on turns instead of shaving a tenth or two off your et.

    --editEd to reduce drama bullshit
    Dam caught by the edit!

  35. #35
    tawksick. toxxxic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Roswell
    Posts
    3,940
    Rep Power
    26

    Default

    Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 21 (18 members and 3 guests)
    toxxxic, ackrite1, aneel, ATLTSX, awestun, blitz_cougar, brandon03318, Catnip, dragoncelica, gtikid, iDrum182, Josh..., josh42191, Kamikaze, Oz10, Repiks, singhondeck, teh bri


    Gahh, this shit is serious.


  36. #36
    Sneaker Freak Repiks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    35
    Posts
    473
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Ninja edit.
    03' Lightning w/ Bolt-Ons | KLR 650 | Duece.

  37. #37
    SHP Josh...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Marietta
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,128
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Repiks View Post
    Ninja edit.
    So whats done to the lightning?
    Quote Originally Posted by xtquickgt00 View Post
    my car is an automatic my overdrive button wasnt working during the dyno i fixed it afterwards. i live out towards cartersville and me and ted were messig around the hole way to powder springs so he converter was hot also... after i dynoed it i puyt it back to stock and it felt stronger and my wheels bent on the pass. side hell fr what it was ying on th dyno ican still manage to get a 14.00 in the 1/4

  38. #38
    Sneaker Freak Repiks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    35
    Posts
    473
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Average bolt ons.
    03' Lightning w/ Bolt-Ons | KLR 650 | Duece.

  39. #39
    Long Live GM! :^o
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Alpharetta
    Age
    42
    Posts
    283
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    For the look, I'd say lower the rear...hope you have some relocation brackets to help settle that rear end when you launch. And those Kumho Powerstar 758s won't hold up very well if you start pulling higher trap speeds.

    Other than that...keep it clean. Not many LT1s out there anymore...

  40. #40
    Sneaker Freak Repiks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Age
    35
    Posts
    473
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    The less weight on the front along with skinny tires will cause a horrible handing effect, and also cause the front to wander.

    And yes, we did it to the same car. Went from slicks and skinnys, to 20 by 9s, then went to the 17s on it now. Much better.
    03' Lightning w/ Bolt-Ons | KLR 650 | Duece.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!