lolol reppedOriginally Posted by Frög
EDIT: you must spread .e.afwef.e.. before giving it to FROG again
lolol reppedOriginally Posted by Frög
EDIT: you must spread .e.afwef.e.. before giving it to FROG again
Land Rover LR3 HSE
lol just giving you a hard time kris.. i <3 your Z..
frog did you send me a pic?
hahah that video was awesome!! "the problem with this mate is your engine is in the back, wrong place" lol
lol i told you, full on hater.Originally Posted by Frög
but i would win.. i think more would be like KRIS = LIES!
Originally Posted by dubs04sti
![]()
check post below... like you have a friend with every porsche?!?! wtf mainOriginally Posted by kayfuNk
idk you too are close.. lolol!!!
biggest mouth: john
king of lies: Kris![]()
Originally Posted by Frög
THANKS YOU .. I KNOW THE KING OF MOUF
lol j/k i dont know..
HUGGIES HOW DO WE HAVE ME NAMES FACKERS?! .. you are whom?
hahaha i figured out who huggies is.. YAY
little dramatic
sexy, BUT.............
993 GT2 is still FTW![]()
the original car posted is really ugly
Originally Posted by antiv6
unbelievably ugly.
You all do realise that while driving an automobile, in most cases, you will be on the inside of the machine. Thus, having only a tantalising view of the hood and front wheel arches (real men don't look in the mirrors). With this information taken into consideration what then does this highly subjective criterion of exterior beauty really matter?Originally Posted by antiv6
It's the god damned homologated son of a car that got 2nd overall at Le Mans. Saying you wouldn't take this car over a 350z is roughly akin to saying you wouldn't take a McLaren F1 over a model year 2025 Nissan Z because you thought the McLaren was "ugly". Roflcopter.Originally Posted by kayfuNk
Excuse me while I vomit inside my mouth.
Last edited by Huggies; 11-02-2007 at 12:22 PM.
Originally Posted by Huggies
you can make any car fast/good at handling.
you can't make a car.. NOT ugly. unless you spend tons of money on body conversions. and in porsches case you wuoldn't want to alter it because the shape is that way for a reason. just not my style, it's disgusting. for 213,000$ id make 10 cars that will destroy that ugly frog of a thing on the highway the track and wherever else, and look good doing it.
For $20,000 i could build a car that would completely destroy the Carrera RS but that not the point. YOU build a car and the value is going to be no more than what you have in it...if even half. The Carrera RS was $12,000 NEW in 1973 & 1974 with the value of the ones sold recently have been $180,00-200,000+. It's a collectors item, period.Originally Posted by kayfuNk
i said look good doing it. i wouldn't want one cuz it's ugly, your 20,000 car would be ugly too.Originally Posted by speedminded
Exactly. Any car with enough money and engineering is capable of eXtreme preformance. In the end a purchased car is a sled to slap your roll cage and Skyline engine onto.Originally Posted by kayfuNk
So why buy anything but a 800kg mid-engined two door which you can then rice to your hearts content into a champion racer? Hehe.
Now, taking a step out of the pits, let's imagine that you are not looking for a Race Car but rather a Sports Car. As a Sports Car the Carrera RS is nigh untouchable. Imagine that our hypothetical driver and owner of a stock Carrera RS and a stock 350Z won't modify his cars in the least. Now what's up, playa.
I think I've discovered your problem. You sleep in Nomex pyjamas don't you? Perhaps you might want to, on occasion, remember that racing is but a subset of what cars are used for, son.
Originally Posted by Huggies
keep your RS garbage, ill go get an F430/gallardo and beat you. back in the day, when ther was nothing else better, im sure i would have bought and RS too for 12,000$, then again, i might have liked the way it looked back in 1847 when it came out.
but as far as current time.. that car just doesn't compare to other super cars for the price.
hell ill go get a gt2 - gt3 CURRENT and pay 100,000$ less, or the Skyline GT-R, new or the old one.
i actually like the newer porsches, they're based off the same "LINES" yes but they look pretty much nothing the same IMO.
1973 Daytona 24 Hour...... Peter Gregg & Hurley Haywood drove a Carrera RS to to the overall victory in the event. THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME EVER A GT CAR FROM THE LOWEST CLASS WAS ABLE TO TAKE OUTRIGHT VICTORY IN THE EVENT AGAINST COMPETION FROM EVEN THE PROTOTYPES like Mirage, Lola, and Matra!!!Originally Posted by Huggies
I'd really like to see a 350z do that today!
LOL @ the morons in here.
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
i.e. the OP.Originally Posted by fcman
I won't name names, lolOriginally Posted by kayfuNk
IA Rules doesn't allow these images in sigs
- IA Mgmt
5 hours later and this **** is still going on...
Land Rover LR3 HSE
i wouldnt say its ugly but 213k...
ok so i guess your issue is paying 213k ....... "thinks"......Originally Posted by Benefit
so you would understand paying $14,000,000 for this either?
![]()
Thats because you don't know how rare these are.
exactly , so common folk wouldnt even know either...so whats the point in paying 213k if you cant ball out
So?Originally Posted by Benefit
.......Originally Posted by Benefit
Now YOU are exactly like those doctors, lawyers, and celebrities you mentioned yesterday that "only buy ferraris and lamborghini's to show them off". Unlike you, some people are knowledgeable about vehicles and purchase one because the way it feels and sounds or in the case of the Carrera RS, a collectable that will only continue to increase in value.Originally Posted by Benefit
i mean dont take me as ignorant ,im very open minded....but 213k i would expect to get laid every hour of the day.
the generalization of porsches as luxury mr2's was a joke!...
11-01-2007 02:51 PM 81911 That is the dumbest **** I have ever heard
lmao
some of you just don't know......just stick with your own damn brand of cars.