Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 65 of 65

Thread: WTF 300ZX sr20?

  1. #41
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    The SR20 is soooo much more simple to work on, parts are cheaper, and there is a significant weight savings. A stock SR20 puts out nearly the same power as a VG30DE (NA Z32) and can easily be modded to exceed the power of the VG30DETT (TT Z32).

    I wouldn't say crap about the SR20 swap unless you've personally torn down a VG.

    I want to put a LS2/LS6 in a Slicktop Z32. I've seen two LT1's and one LS1 but nobody had put a LS2 or LS6 that i'm aware of. Now the question is will Yutaka Katayama (Mr. K) want to kill me?
    Last edited by speedminded; 10-11-2007 at 11:27 AM.

  2. #42
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Da_unknown
    how u figure i was about to bash this post, i have seen the 350zs with this swap, hell last week i saw a r32 with a sr20 in it.... stick to what u know...and the sh*t is ugly i wouldnt drive it personally....
    SR20 with a Z32 transmission


  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Age
    39
    Posts
    4,313
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    epic fail

  4. #44
    EAT DOG white_rice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    lawrenceville
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,756
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    lol like that one jeep with a supra engine at nopi ...doing the burouts...lol

  5. #45
    EAT DOG white_rice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    lawrenceville
    Age
    40
    Posts
    2,756
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    oo what kid of paint is that anyone know...?

  6. #46
    magical negro/photog .blank cd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts
    12,103
    Rep Power
    39

    Default

    This dude spent all this money on the motor and exterior stuff, and the interior looks like ****!!! that would be one of the first places i would spend money at. As for this VG engine. It will handle alot more horses stock for stock than the SR. a VG30DETT with a good tune can handle up to 700hp on stock internals. Z1 Motorsports in Carrollton built one with almost 1200 hp.

    NIKON Squad member 01

    I HAVE SUBS AND CAMERAS AND LENSES FO SALE
    OF*C
    OEMFitment Crew Memeber 01

  7. #47
    Getting there admedlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Columbus
    Age
    39
    Posts
    868
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    oh snap he went with the quad exhaust setup, he's the man!! you know all that powa needs to go out the sides and the back, not just a single exhaust like everyone else

  8. #48
    4rd WHAT? SicStang03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sandy Springs/Dunwoody
    Age
    38
    Posts
    3,417
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    I just put in a bid.... that thing is HAWT


    Quote Originally Posted by coolcat View Post
    NO SHIT AT ALL I JUST HAD MILK AND A COOKIE. I DIPPED THAT BITCH AND EVERYTHING, SORT OF LIKE I DID MY NUTS INTO YOUR MOTHERS LOOSE VAGINA.
    Quote Originally Posted by Te72Rob View Post
    That......would be my bad. Sorry.

  9. #49
    SR powered S14 chituntang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ATL, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    737
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Just wanted to say not everybody in the world is looking at getting all the hp there is. Some just trying to prove they can. Yes, the VG30DETT is a great motor, but not a lot of aftermarket parts compare to SR. And as tuners know, there is not a lot of room for a Z32 so upgrade is harder. SR in Z cars is just a great idea to make a race car as Supra use 3SGTE engines for GT500 in Japan.

  10. #50
    SR powered S14 chituntang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ATL, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    737
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blank cd
    This dude spent all this money on the motor and exterior stuff, and the interior looks like ****!!! that would be one of the first places i would spend money at. As for this VG engine. It will handle alot more horses stock for stock than the SR. a VG30DETT with a good tune can handle up to 700hp on stock internals. Z1 Motorsports in Carrollton built one with almost 1200 hp.
    Guess what? A stock can handle 400 with stock internals. just think about which one take more efford.

  11. #51
    Certified Gearhead
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Age
    48
    Posts
    689
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    So what if a VG can ultimately handle more power? Sure there are plenty of people out there driving 700hp cars, but in reality, a solid 300-400hp is the most the average tuner will ever see.

    I have a Z32 sitting in my garage right now. Every time I look in that engine bay, I think about how better the car would be with an SR under the hood. I've done a lot of work with SRs, and I've found them to be ridiculously reliable, not to mention easy to work on. The amount of room the SR would free up in that engine bay would be worth the swap costs by itself...not to mention the weight savings.

    That car is hideous though. The knucklehead painted EVERYTHING white, including the wiper arms and stupid crap like that. Regardless, the swap is awesome. It makes me really tempted to try it myself.

  12. #52
    ☠gOOn☠ Brian*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ☠Young Harris☠
    Age
    40
    Posts
    6,809
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    saw one in my home town (naples fl) with an rb20 in it... guess its cool, dunno

  13. #53
    STREET<3LOVE DoriDori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Georiga
    Age
    38
    Posts
    768
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    410hp SR20 powered Z32?? Id drive one. Just not this one, looks awful lol.

  14. #54
    Banned Z32redondo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Columbus, GA
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTScoob
    Probably started out its life as a non turbo car. VG30DE is also a very heavy motor, you could probably drop 200lbs off the front of the car with an SR20 and have very similar performance to a stockish VG30DETT.

    Quote Originally Posted by SpecV_Scott

    That car is hideous though. The knucklehead painted EVERYTHING white, including the wiper arms and stupid crap like that. Regardless, the swap is awesome. It makes me really tempted to try it myself.


    Ya know wasnt sure whether he painted it or not. I do know that turbo Z32's came with the whole front bumper painted the color of the car and NA's came with a section of the bumper a greyish color. It also came with a section on the left and right of the front bumper that has these weird little vents on it, and that only came on the turbo model of the car.



    There is also a switch on the center section that has an electric window adjustment at the same time on the turbo models had an adjustment for suspension. Atleast as far as I know was only on the twin turbo model.

    What im not sure about is 2 things. Whether the 2+2 model came twin turbo or not and whether the US or 2+2 came with white faced gauges. If the 2+2 came non turbo then this was a nonturbo. Also under the RPM gauge there is a boost gauge. It is not shown on this car but at the same time this car has white faced gauges and I beleive that the white only came in JDMland and he swapped his original twin turbo gauge for a set of NA gauges that were white.


    Quote Originally Posted by Fr33way
    Word, wish I had some hardfast numbers for you on the VG30.
    The NA is slow as ****


    Quote Originally Posted by Glides
    Lets see, the obvious that jumps out at me are:

    1 Cheap ass parts.
    2 Incredible aftermarket for the SR motor
    3 Cheap motor set to do the swap with
    4 Huge sprung weight savings over teh VQ
    5 You ever tried to work on a VQ in the car? Nightmare.

    Other than those, blaringly obvious things. I would do an SR swap anyday over a VQ or VQTT motor. Much more reliable, light, cheap and a cool swap too.
    If I am right and the car started as a TT in the first place here is what I noticed.
    1. He states he has spent over 12,000 total on the swap and only has 400HP. Same amount of money on the VG and you would be in the high 100's.

    2. It is a significant save on weight but at the same time only a few 100 pounds and when we are talking 12k into an sr swap and 12k into a VG30dett we are also talking about a huge gap by a few 100 HP. And with that kind of power a few 100 pounds is nothing. The VG would be faster.

    3.You may have a alot more and cheaper parts for the SR but at the same time the VG responds better to mods than the SR does. So as you m ay save more you dont get the same power. Where as with the VG you spend more but you get more. You get out what you put in.

    4. You are right about the VG being an enourmously big engine but it is that way for a reason and that is because the car weight a ****load and needs that kind of power to move the car.


    Quote Originally Posted by blank cd
    Z1 Motorsports in Carrollton built one with almost 1200 hp.
    Which Z are you talking about? If your talking about Russels it was only 1054HP








    Im not bashing the swap at all it sounds like it could be a nice car with some interior and exhaust work. I just dont understand why? If he is trying to lose some of the weight, fine. But why lose some of the weight? To go faster? Why not just put the 12K into the VG and call it a day. In the end you would be faster. Maybe a little heavier but in the end ALOT faster. To make a base line race car? Well why not just throw it in the 240 and spend 12K on it. You would ultimately be faster than this car is and maybe a competitor if he had just spent 12K on the VG. It just dosent make much sense to me. Thats just me though and im expecting some constructive criticism towards my post of constructive critisism towards yalls so maybe that can give a few ideas towards this guys thinking.
    Last edited by NSCredondo; 10-29-2007 at 10:57 AM.

  15. #55
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo
    Ya know wasnt sure whether he painted it or not. I do know that turbo Z32's came with the whole front bumper painted the color of the car and NA's came with a section of the bumper a greyish color. It also came with a section on the left and right of the front bumper that has these weird little vents on it, and that only came on the turbo model of the car.



    There is also a switch on the center section that has an electric window adjustment at the same time on the turbo models had an adjustment for suspension. Atleast as far as I know was only on the twin turbo model.

    What im not sure about is 2 things. Whether the 2+2 model came twin turbo or not and whether the US or 2+2 came with white faced gauges. If the 2+2 came non turbo then this was a nonturbo. Also under the RPM gauge there is a boost gauge. It is not shown on this car but at the same time this car has white faced gauges and I beleive that the white only came in JDMland and he swapped his original twin turbo gauge for a set of NA gauges that were white.



    The NA is slow as ****




    If I am right and the car started as a TT in the first place here is what I noticed.
    1. He states he has spent over 12,000 total on the swap and only has 400HP. Same amount of money on the VQ and you would be in the high 100's.

    2. It is a significant save on weight but at the same time only a few 100 pounds and when we are talking 12k into an sr swap and 12k into a VQ30dett we are also talking about a huge gap by a few 100 HP. And with that kind of power a few 100 pounds is nothing. The VQ would be faster.

    3.You may have a alot more and cheaper parts for the SR but at the same time the VQ responds better to mods than the SR does. So as you m ay save more you dont get the same power. Where as with the VQ you spend more but you get more. You get out what you put in.

    4. You are right about the VQ being an enourmously big engine but it is that way for a reason and that is because the car weight a ****load and needs that kind of power to move the car.




    Which Z are you talking about? If your talking about Russels it was only 1054HP








    Im not bashing the swap at all it sounds like it could be a nice car with some interior and exhaust work. I just dont understand why? If he is trying to lose some of the weight, fine. But why lose some of the weight? To go faster? Why not just put the 12K into the VG and call it a day. In the end you would be faster. Maybe a little heavier but in the end ALOT faster. To make a base line race car? Well why not just throw it in the 240 and spend 12K on it. You would ultimately be faster than this car is and maybe a competitor if he had just spent 12K on the VQ. It just dosent make much sense to me. Thats just me though and im expecting some constructive criticism towards my post of constructive critisism towards yalls so maybe that can give a few ideas towards this guys thinking.
    I can't believe people took the time to critique this car. There was never a TT 2+2 in the US. The VIN comes back as "1991 NISSAN 300ZX 2+2 - 3.0L V6 FI".

    The bumper isn't even OEM, stock doesn't have a removable lower valence and they don't have the lower part of the valence protruding out...the car looks like they were trying to replicate a SMZ. If I remember correctly all bumpers up to 1994 had the grey strip between the driving/fog lights, '95 & 96+ were body colored.

    As for money spent, what he spent $12k on may cost any of us $5,000 if we did it ourselves...not including the $2k or so made off selling the original engine.

  16. #56
    Yeah man. Fr33way's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North OTP
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,603
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo
    The NA is slow as ****
    Umm. Yeah, I was talking about dry weight of engine without accessories and the difficulty of knowing what exactly was on the engine when weighed when the numbers are pulled from a site.

    Also, you are a Z32 guy. You call the motor a VQ like six times....

  17. #57
    Banned Z32redondo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Columbus, GA
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by speedminded
    I can't believe people took the time to critique this car. There was never a TT 2+2 in the US. The VIN comes back as "1991 NISSAN 300ZX 2+2 - 3.0L V6 FI".

    The bumper isn't even OEM, stock doesn't have a removable lower valence and they don't have the lower part of the valence protruding out...the car looks like they were trying to replicate a SMZ. If I remember correctly all bumpers up to 1994 had the grey strip between the driving/fog lights, '95 & 96+ were body colored.

    As for money spent, what he spent $12k on may cost any of us $5,000 if we did it ourselves...not including the $2k or so made off selling the original engine.
    Thank you I wasnt too sure on the 2+2 being twin turbo or not in the states. I never really looked into it seeing as how I have a convertible and I never really needed to know until now.

    How is that not a stock 300zx twin turbo bumper though. Besides the fact that it has lip/spoiler on it?


    Quote Originally Posted by Fr33way
    Umm. Yeah, I was talking about dry weight of engine without accessories and the difficulty of knowing what exactly was on the engine when weighed when the numbers are pulled from a site.

    Also, you are a Z32 guy. You call the motor a VQ like six times....
    I was just commenting that some people were saying the sr20 could compete with a stock VG30DE in the case of this car. I was just saying it was slow. miscommunication when I thought thats what you were talking about.

    Oh and thats the effects of writing a big post at 2 AM in the morn in the dark. I have known since I bought the car it was VG. I only called it a VQ after I was quoting Glides post and in it he says VQ instead of VG I think might also have been part of it






    Thanks for the constructive critisism.

  18. #58
    z32 power thursdaybuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Lawrenceville/Snellville
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo
    How is that not a stock 300zx twin turbo bumper though. Besides the fact that it has lip/spoiler on it?
    it is a stock twin turbo front bumper with a lip and a splitter on it. but either way the bumper did not come stock on that car. like speedminded said, since the 2+2s did not come tt in the US, that bumper was put on there along with all that other crap and probably painted.
    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo
    Which Z are you talking about? If your talking about Russels it was only 1054HP
    i don't know what z he's talking about either but russell's is a bit higher than that now last i heard.

  19. #59
    Banned Z32redondo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Columbus, GA
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thursdaybuff
    it is a stock twin turbo front bumper with a lip and a splitter on it. but either way the bumper did not come stock on that car. like speedminded said, since the 2+2s did not come tt in the US, that bumper was put on there along with all that other crap and probably painted.

    i don't know what z he's talking about either but russell's is a bit higher than that now last i heard.
    Oh I now know that it isnt stock on that car I thought what he was saying was that it was an aftermarke front bumper. Because he said it isnt even OEM.

    I guess I have some research to do on Russells Z because last I heard it was the fastest street legal Z. Reps to you sir

  20. #60
    The Nissan KING! R32Dragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sumter
    Age
    41
    Posts
    612
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Innovative, I guess i'd rather have that than a stock NA 2+2. But confused stares would prolly follow that car when Z owners hear it drive by.
    Daily - '03 Infiniti G35c Sport
    Power - '03 Mitsubishi Evolution VIII
    Beater - '97 GMC Jimmy

  21. #61
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thursdaybuff
    it is a stock twin turbo front bumper with a lip and a splitter on it. but either way the bumper did not come stock on that car. like speedminded said, since the 2+2s did not come tt in the US, that bumper was put on there along with all that other crap and probably painted.
    So the vent holes of the valence/spoiler line up flawlessly with the vent holes on a TT bumper? Or is it an NA bumper with a big rectangle cut out where the vent would be then the lower valence added over it?

  22. #62
    Yeah man. Fr33way's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North OTP
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1,603
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo

    I was just commenting that some people were saying the sr20 could compete with a stock VG30DE in the case of this car. I was just saying it was slow. miscommunication when I thought thats what you were talking about.
    I gotcha.
    Quote Originally Posted by NSCredondo
    Oh and thats the effects of writing a big post at 2 AM in the morn in the dark. I have known since I bought the car it was VG. I only called it a VQ after I was quoting Glides post and in it he says VQ instead of VG I think might also have been part of it
    No big deal mate.

  23. #63
    Senior Member sakasaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,647
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    this guy is so stupid he should go fall in a hole!!!!

    Lurking

  24. #64
    z32 power thursdaybuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Lawrenceville/Snellville
    Posts
    479
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by speedminded
    So the vent holes of the valence/spoiler line up flawlessly with the vent holes on a TT bumper? Or is it an NA bumper with a big rectangle cut out where the vent would be then the lower valence added over it?
    yup, they actually made the lip to fit perfectly over the stock tt bumper

    Stillen's lip

    but yeah there is the possibility that he did some cutting to his whether it be what you said or just completely cut off the n/a lower lip and added the tt lip. normally i would say the guy wouldn't be that stupid but judging by the rest of the car, i wouldn't put it past him.

  25. #65
    www.jasontbarker.com speedminded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    22,589
    Rep Power
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thursdaybuff
    yup, they actually made the lip to fit perfectly over the stock tt bumper

    Stillen's lip

    but yeah there is the possibility that he did some cutting to his whether it be what you said or just completely cut off the n/a lower lip and added the tt lip. normally i would say the guy wouldn't be that stupid but judging by the rest of the car, i wouldn't put it past him.
    He wouldn't have to cut the lower part of the bumper off, just cut two rectangles out where the vents are.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!