IQ

[djmaddmartin]

LEFTIST COLLECTIVISM.....?????? Wooo nice word

Its more complex than that:





Have fun with this one. I will enjoy reading your rant.

You don't get it.

I'm not a conservative right-wing republican.

I never voted for Bush.

I am JUST here to expose your pompous self-fellating lies for what they are.

It is a RARITY for you to make a cogent, salient point on this board, not the norm.

I will address just three things that you said in all your inane ramblings:

1) 36% approval rating. Explain that........Poll after poll say people don't support or agree with you or Bush. Even many of his own Republicans are getting fed up. Another fact.

It would make more sense if you were to compare that to the approval ratings of other presidents around this time in their presidencies. If you do, you'll find that Bush's approval rating isn't devastatingly low (I think Clinton's was 42% or something, but don't quote me on that, look it up). No doubt things such as high gas prices and the hurricaines also contributed to that. Generally, if people are pissed off, they're stupid enough to think that it's the president's fault. Do I think Bush is a failure overall as a president? Yes. Do I tout pointless approval ratings of a lame duck president to prove my point? No. That's the difference between people who have learned to think and people who have not.

2) I was flipping through the channels on tv and happened to stop at one of the christian networks. Usually it has the normal thumping but today I was in for a treat. 20 dancer all in military attire dancing around a stage to the "the lord is great". Does this at all disturb you? How about someone not in this country who might happen upon this.

It would disturb me a great deal more if it were state-sponsored or state-mandated. Otherwise, however much I do or do not approve, it's a private organization performing a song. I thought you were all about free speech? No, you're just about free speech that you agree with.

3) An active movement towards a theological based government. History has proven that leads to nothing but disaster and holocost.

You sad, sad little man. You have no idea where your own political ideology takes YOU. You're right, that theocracies lead to oppressive governments. SO DOES LEFTIST COLLECTIVISM. As a matter of fact, if you'll look at the large-scale massacres and government oppression over the past 100 years in the western world (middle east is another matter entirely), you'll find that collectivist ideology has killed over 100 million people.

But hey, Bush sucks and we should just try to get it right, eh? Surely they were just missing some proper timing or some shit.

Get a grip, poindexter. You can't win here, because you haven't learn to reason, and your ideology is fundamentally fallacious.

[malfeas99]

LEFTIST COLLECTIVISM.....?????? Wooo nice word

Its more complex than that:





Have fun with this one. I will enjoy reading your rant.

Yes, leftist collectivist. Because there's also rightist collectvists (fascists). The ideologies are actually not that far apart in their extremes. Do some reading on the Russian and German intelligence agents that were sent to the other side to convert communists to fascists and vice versa. It was actually very easy, because they're almost exactly the same in practice and result.

Do you honestly think I've never seen one of those graphs? Do you honestly think it has anything to do with what I said to you, and your complete lack of response to any of it?

Once again, you've shown that you can't actually say anything unless it's been spoon-fed to you by someone else. I'm sure after some more frenetic searching on dailykos or democraticunderground, you'll respond with some very pithy political cartoons illustrating how stupid Bush is. Again.