LOL!Originally Posted by MongolPup
LOL!Originally Posted by MongolPup
I took the nos out, harry said I have a heavy foot, I'd blow myself to pieces.Originally Posted by MongolPup
The ZR-1 has a Z rated tire. The Viper has a Pilot Cup Sport, which is not much better than an standard PS2. The GT-R has a specially designed Bridgestone RE070-R which is not only superior but gives it a huge advantage like I already mentioned..Originally Posted by chituntang
The reading comprehension on this forum is just funny
and that means? the vette/viper should come with better tires..Originally Posted by OnURleft
But they don't, which gives the GTR a better advantage on paper from the factory. The 3rd time i've said this. Should and do are two different wordsOriginally Posted by JITB
Street cars should NOT come with RACE R-compound tires... LOL if Nissan had n e balls they'd run on the same STREET tires as everyone else.Originally Posted by OnURleft
1993 BMW 325is
-H&R Sport Springs
-Bilstien Shocks
-Supersprint Exhaust
-Comforti Chip
-B&M Short Shifter
-DSII M3 Wheels/Yokohama S-Drives
-Hawk HPS/Zimmermann Rotors
2000 Porsche Boxster S
-Arctic Silver on Red
-Stock
2003 Derbi GPR 50
-Metrakit SP 72cc Big Bore Kit
-Arrow Exhaust
-24mm DelOrto Carb
Originally Posted by OnURleft
those tires only come on the top model, im not sure which one is track or whatever. but all models dont have the same tires.
In that logic, if Chevy had any balls they would put in a TT V6 or be AWD.... Batmobl thats just a moronic statement.
Oh, so your turbo car is faster? Well, if you had any balls you would take the turbo off and run me.
See my point?lol
97 DX Civic w/ H22 FS
Haha well, it's getting to the point where they have to in order to put the power down.Originally Posted by BATMOBL
I see the GT-R as a great car, but again put some Conti-sports on it or PS2's and you'll see a huge difference on paper. Not only is your car slower now that its on par with the compeition, but your stuck in a heavy, soeing machine sounding supercar that's twitchy and not all that fun at the limit.
Same thing goes for the Evo's.. People were blown away by what they could do on paper, but take away those factory Yoko R compound summer tires and throw on some regular Y or Z rated tires and suddenly the performance is not anything out of the ordinary at all
Originally Posted by OnURleft
thats what the tires are made for high performance cars, take off the turbo, and awd.. and u got a lancer. y are we handicapping factory cars. This is how these cars are released.. thats how they are tested, there is no advantage, because one car has a better set of oem tires on it.
If you were Nissan and you wanted to close the performance gap between the GT-R and cars like the ACR, ZR-1, 911 gt2, etc, what would be the easiest way?? Not saying the times aren't legit, but the advantage on paper can be just as easily lost in the real world when its opponents have equal traction.Originally Posted by JITB
Well in looks I think yes, once again, peoples opinions.Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
Number of passengers you win, I don't want passengers anyway lol.
Cargo room? I don't carry many bags.
Ride quality, could care less obviously being on metal bushings and seam welded chassis.
Yeah obviously you want a DD, so what's the argument? I want a fast car you want a clean DD that's easy to drive. I am sure you will have something, what is it? A 350Z?![]()
Interesting point about taking the turbo away and having a Lancer. The only reason I feel compelled to mention that is I remember how being turbocharged was "cheating" and the LSx was a better motor because it makes "real" power. That brings you back to the age old argument about Japanese cars making "efficient" power (let's use the example of Honda screaming into the 90's with over 100 hp a liter) and American cars using brute force (V-8 anyone?). Aren't the tires an extension of that mentality? Hey, instead of adding X horsepower, let's get the same effect by slapping on some super sticky tires?
Just thinking out loud. Didn't want to reply in this thread and be part of the problem not the cure as far as useless posts.
That is really true when you think about it.Originally Posted by MongolPup
the gtr still sucks.
The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.
Well i think reading would be a good idea.
Originally Posted by matthewAPM
Actually the Z06 isn't faster....the ZR1 is.Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
Sorry GTR fanboy but this post meant nothing because Nissan didn't achieved anything with this lap time.
lmfao. use regular y or z tires on a zr1 or any high horse power car for that matter and see if you can keep it on the road.Originally Posted by OnURleft
They should run Bridgestone RE11's
Are ya'll fucking kidding, this was already quoted, explained once...Originally Posted by willum14pb
A ZR1 has a fucking standard Z rated tire, with a 220 tread wear, which gets gooey and sticky when its HOT which hampers performance.
A SKYLINE DOES NOT you DUMB motherfuckers. They highest tread wear on any tire offered is a 140 (equal to the Toyo R1R), the optional R Dunlops are even lower (80ish). In other words it is a pure race compound tire, which behaves like race tire, not a pilot sport and cuts LOTS of time
You clearly have no knowledge of tires compounds and how they behave...Originally Posted by JITB
One car has a tire that behaves better when it's HOT as hell, the others sans the ACR, GT2 and GT3RS (which still have a lesser tire then the GTR) have a tire which gets greasy and de-laminates when it's hot and being pushed. The GTR significantly puts better times down solely because it's on race compound tires, which some of the competition lacks
Man Nissan fan boys..
UGHH!!!!
nope....it's gonna have a v8, and it's not going to be a nissanOriginally Posted by simontibbett
But that's a couple years down the road when I actually get a job making some decent money
I don't understand this new arguement about the gtr having an unfair advantage because of it's racing tires.
How can one say a car has the advantage because of tires that it comes with? That's like saying the viper acr has an advantage because it has more hp and 6 more cylinders...
The gtr might or might not have good tires, I don't know, but either way that is a stupid arguement. Go to a drag strip, race someone, and tell them that they won because they had better tires and it was unfair....![]()
Originally Posted by OnURleft
i understand what your saying.....
BUt im saying, when they make cars..
Cars have features
And things that they come with to make them perform a certain way
Its not right for you to subtract things from a car because you say they give the car an advantage. Its retarded, its like saying put all seasons onthe ZCR and it wont run those great ring times.. or take the blower off the Zr1 and see what it runs.. its not fair. Stock v. stock you compare the cars. Those tires come on factory GTR's not aftermarket, you dont handicap factory cars when u test them. There are plenty cars that perform a certain way because of 1 key element.
A tire is a variable, not a feature. This is my opinion... It wears out, and different ones change the entire dynamics of the car. No one forces you to buy the factory tire when your are shopping for new tires, in 7,000 miles in the GTR's case. Japanese companies are smart, because they have gotten away with bragging rights solely because of the tire compounds they choose to put on some of their cars from the factory. Look at factory Evo 8 tires for example.Originally Posted by JITB
It's unfair to say the GTR is so much faster, when it's getting a handicap from its race tires. Put the same tire on every car and run them, and you'll understand exactly what I think is a FAIR comparison
You really do just talk out of your ass. Don't ever brag about the GTR's lap times then on the Ring. It's tires alone are giving it about 10 seconds over standard Z rated tires available on the GT3, Z06, Turbo, M3, etc. etc. etcOriginally Posted by NissanTun3r
I suggest you start getting some experience before you call a completely logical argument stupid. Go read a magazine, or an article online. I'm 100% positive you'll find several articles talking about the big advantage to the GTR is its factory tires.
Last edited by OnURleft; 04-20-2009 at 01:55 PM.
Originally Posted by OnURleft
brake pads wear out also... And so do engine mounts.
I say the tires are a feature, because they dont come on every GTR model.
Yes all variables that can significantly decrease or increase a cars performance on paper, like a TIRE compund. I'm surprised the GTR doesn't come factor with HAWK HT-10s.Originally Posted by JITB
Edit: Even the lesser tire is a 140 tread wear. It's still a summer/race compound tire that preforms better when it's HOT
Originally Posted by OnURleft
so they should install the same brake pads/motor mounts/tires, and any other variable on the vette, viper, and GTR and than it will be official?
When you put together a car, you give it the best things that will make it function the best. Especially a car like this. AND especially being that the GTR is the cheapest out the bunch...
It's offical how it is. Brake pad technology is more or less the same. It's just not exactly fair because the tire compound on the GTR is a RACE TIRE. Hellloooo, Mcfly are you home? THE CAR IS HANDICAPPEDOriginally Posted by JITB
I don't know why but you seem to always make your posts personal and load them with words that you think will hurt my feelings. lolol You might know more aobut tires than me, good for you. Because let me tell you, that means so much outside this forum...Originally Posted by OnURleft
You're the dumbass, because every single component that makes up a car deteriorates over time, wears out, and can change the dynamics of the car. Same could be said about engines, trannies, wheels, chassis, damn near everything!
SO before you start talking about the gtr having an unfair advantage over a viper/zr1 vette that costs a lot more, which make a lot more power, which are faster, and which have bigger engines maybe you need to check yourself and rethink your logic.
Your definition of a fair comparison is neither fair nor logical. Even if the evo and gtr had the same tires the gtr would outperform it. According to your logic the viper acr is getting a handicap over the gtr because of it's bigger engine and more hp right? That's nonsense.
Originally Posted by OnURleft
The ACR IS a Race car..
You are trying to explain logic to someone with an illogical mindset. He wants to believe what he wants to believe. Some ppl are ignorantly stupid and can't help it. Let him be...Originally Posted by JITB
I think everyone is an idiot.
Epic reading comprehension FAIL. In no way was there a direct comparison to an Evo and a GTR. Negative repped, your an idiot. Go back to my original post and my original STATEMENT. It was never an argument, it was fact, that I posted.Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
I didn't argue anything about anything regarding turbo's, price, displacement, nobody really on here has the time or lack of brain cells to do that other than you and your magazine philosophizing friends.
I simply stated the GTR, solely....the GTR has an UNFAIR advantage because it is on RACE compound tires which give it a LARGE handicap over SOME of the competition.
Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
lol your starting stuff, and calling names..
i just like to talk about car shit... even tho its pointless, and means nothing.. its still entertaining until it gets ugly. than im done.
Originally Posted by JITB
....Originally Posted by onUrleft
I'm done here. When I'm met with stupidity of this level, I leave.Originally Posted by OnURleft
Does anyone else find this ironic in here?Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
Originally Posted by OnURleft
race cars should come with race tires.
you cant leave yourself... wtf?Originally Posted by NissanTun3r
The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.
Actually this is still considered a street tire. If you read the sidewall, a DOT-R would say "DOT R" on the side. These have a tread rating of 140...Originally Posted by OnURleft
Hoosier R6 (DOT R)- 40
Kumho V710 (DOT R)- 30
please do research before calling someone an idiot