Quote Originally Posted by admedlin
lol all the arguing and the last comment is that the seats look comfy!! nice



haha I love my S, but I don't track it. there's no point really. Its an awesome handling car, its quick, but it is still a Honda with no torque. I bought mine for looks and to have a fun ride, not for tracking. The new CR is a little quicker than mine, but only because it weighs a little less and is more aerodynamic.

I know nothing about racing, but I know that although my car is quick, the STi, EVO, and a lot of other cars should easily beat it. trying to compare a 240hp/165tq 2900 pound car to a 300hp/300tq 3000 pound car is retarded. 200 pounds isn't going to make so much of a difference really.

I'd like to sit here and say HONDA FTMFW, but I know that isn't going to happen unless the S was turbo. If you were to race the CR vs. most n/a 4cyl, the CR would definitely have more of a chance. But comparing a n/a convertible with a turbo awd STi just doesn't really make sense.

Looking at the price, the Honda is more expensive than the other ones. Is anyone surprised? Plus like someone else said, its like a $3,000 premium to get the CR over a base S2K. How much is the Nismo over the base 350? I'm sure this will definitely be a good selling car, just because it is a Honda and people know the reliability. It may not be THE quickest car for the price, but it will be a fun ride!
Well said. Also, the fact that you don't track you S is not a rarity, with any car. This is why I never understood the people who brag about which car is faster on the Nurburgring or Tsukuba etc... The fact is, only a small percentage of people who buy those cars actually track them. TRACK TIMES ONLY MEAN SOMETHING WHEN YOU ACTUALLY TRACK YOUR CAR! Something that people on IA don't seem to understand.

You get reps, sir.