Quote Originally Posted by E36slide View Post

You just helped my argument.. Ford went away from just performance and added their idea of luxury (which isn't all that nice unless a cramped interior was what they were going for) which caused them to loose more on the performance side.
No, Ford went away with the idea of "if you buy a Mustang you're going to get a shitty interior". Starting in 2010s and up the quality and materials used in the production of their models even down to the V6 have vast improvements over it's past year models. Im 6'1 and I hardly think an S197 interior is cramped, so not sure what you're talking about. Caused them to lose more on the performance side? Where the hell do you pull this shit out of?

Quote Originally Posted by E36slide View Post
When I hear "mustang" I hear the best performance car you can buy for the money. Obviously it isn't. Never said you "said" they were the best, but these guys surely made it out to be the best production performance car out there for under 40k. I never made anything up I just don't remember what all he said before we ran nor do I care. Again in sticking with my statement. "it's a over priced pos"
Roush and Saleen models never were about huge performance for the money. A 2013 GT500 / 2013 GT500 Super Snake does have the most power per dollar for the money. Many top automotive reviewers have also claimed this. So this Roush doesnt have 600HP for 40k, you're an idiot for covering an entire platform based on some Roush Stage (X).

Quote Originally Posted by E36slide View Post

I wast show casing my kill to say "I beat the fastest mustang ever" I was showing that my poorly built car (previous owners work) beat a highly rated mustang with modifications and it didn't take much for my car to be able to do so
Highly rated? By whom? You? The entire Mustang enthusiast base? You really have no idea.