I had a photoshoot with Biggie (Built4Speed.org). Here's what came of it. Let me know what you think.
Built4Speed Photoshoot
I had a photoshoot with Biggie (Built4Speed.org). Here's what came of it. Let me know what you think.
Ugliest bitch I have ever seen.
Later, 1439/2200.
Originally Posted by 1439/2000
isnt that candice?
haha I am Candice silly :P
lol well that would make sense now wouldnt it? when'd ya change ya name?
When I decided to stay lol
The photos arent sharp at all.....
What kind of equipment are you using to shoot with?
You either are shooting with a low end point and shoot or your compression software is jacked up.
I'm just the model. Not the photographer :P No idea hun.
my only 2 cents, first shirt didn't compliment ur eyes, second did. poses(sp) were pretty good. better camera need. looks good tho.
No siggy as of right now
I'm with nem and vert. Unimaginative poses, everything looked the same, background hurt the pics and all in all, not very detailed.
The Observer. lol.
photos suck, modeling was ok, needs some props and some poses... looking good though
tanning bed asap
+1
y0 wtf is this shit! redneck photoshoot bhwahhahahah.
You are one ugly chick.
this has to be a joke.. bwhahhahhahhaah
the second set look better then the first
I think she is a cutie.
Leisa and Val May You Rest In Peace!
362 WHP
401 WTQ NO NITROUS
Damn, you guys are harsh.
I looked at the site for built4speed, and most photos by that photographer look that way....low quality, low compression, and lack of a "pop" in the photos. Just my opinion though.
Last edited by Nemesis Digital; 06-14-2006 at 08:53 PM.
Okay I would do this for anyone that posted pictures... but to be honest, if these were the photos you recieved after payment, id be demanding some money back.
Looking at the photos more, I notice shadows after improper use of flash, spots on the white screen, mat lines from where she was sitting, and poor use of whatever software being used for saving these photos. All little things that a pro would know to look for during a shoot. The colors seemed washed out. The reds arent red, the blues arent blue...just lack of depth overall...
Once again, im not trying to rip on someone elses work, just providing some constructive opinions.
improper structure of poses... makeup... if you want your eyes which seems best feature to stand out... dont match the color, turns bland and doesnt flow. Hair always should only feature one side of the face... show a ear and some neck on the other side to show your face structure and not make you look like you are short...
Double jointed huh
protein stains
you are trying to pose way to hard... just act natural...
i think i like pic' # 15........
maybe # 16
fuccindubin
"biggie" sucks at photography, smokes pot when shooting (could just be me, but I certainly smelled it when I was shooting inside of HIS scion...)... when he does, it takes him like 30 mins to produce a minimum of like 5 photo's. He goes on myspace, if he shoots with you, he will make sure to nag your friends until he gets them into his house so he can take pictures of girls for whatever reason. Go to www.built4speed.org and make sure to listen to him talk... can we say CREEPY? Some people just shouldnt do photography. Take pictures or whatever... sure.... but not claim it as a professional hobby like the above listed in the signature on the pictures.
Just my
Just a few examples of his "work"....
I know im not the hottest thing in the world.... but damn.
Last edited by fawk_you; 06-15-2006 at 12:38 AM.
♥
hmm - I agree, the photographer couldve been better - go talk to Nemesislol - but the last set really came out decently IMO
so, wanna grab lunch?
̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(•̪●)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
the photography isnt that great like george pointed out...she does look cute in the last two ill give her that...but the photography still sucks
My question is, why do these girls even pose if they see the work before hand? Am I missing something? And if its true what you say LeAnne about him inviting girls inside his house for "special pictures" that is pathetic. If you're model isnt 100 percent comfortable with you , then in my opinion your shots will show it.
Damn, this is why I am nervous shooting studio cause there is way too many variables in all of this. George, this is the first time I have ever seen you break down a picture like this and get this technical. I agree these don't pop and I believe it is the software as I have seen some of his other work and it looked pretty good. I know Reggie and he seems like a standup guy and from talking to some of the girls he does not do anything out of the ordinary or nag them till they do a shoot. So whatever Lee Anne is fabricating is not true, especially since I remember her posts praising his work and "couldn't wait till the next shoot". Now Lee Anne I have no idea what the deal is with you two but I know there is some beef there either him not bowing down to you and/or shooting you when you want or whatever but there is no reason to fabricate things.
As for what he shoots with I am pretty sure it is a 20D but not real sure of the lens.
As for the shadow and things like that, sometimes it is inevitable but can also be intentional. This is one of my favorite photographers, his work is amazing and they really pop. This is what I want to be able to reproduce from shooting studio and location.
http://www.onemodelplace.com/member.cfm/P_ID/3661
Really depends on the look you are going for and the feel of the picture, sometimes having the hair come down around the face and "framing" the model can give the best results but for most shots, you are correct.
The 20D died i believe, not sure what he's shooting with now...i can't remember...don't think it's a D50 but it is a D-SLR. The compression has always been strange, he shoots in raw but not sure what software is used.
Reggie won't shoot Lea Anne anymore...just because how she is and who she thinks she is. Then talking shit about a photographer other than constructive criticism as George is doing is a good way to never get work...something not even boob job will fix. Lea Anne, for a long time you couldn't keep a goddamn bowl out of your mouth yet you still tell people you have never used drugs. You are a liar and you are fucking with someones business. No matter how good or bad his work is he still makes money off it and has fun doing it. If he doesn't want to work with someone after 1 shoot then he doesn't have to, it's his prerogative.
As for Candice's shoot, i don't like the clothes at all...honestly 99.9% of jean skirts are trashy.The makeup needs to be much more subtle...what you have here is potential hidden under a bunch of trash: be relaxed, more natural, etc. On her myspace the two pics in the blue shirt are 1000x better.
^ Thats what I thought. I have talked to several of the girls he has shot and they all have nothing but good things to say about him and his attitude.
I agree on the clothes as well.
Where do you see me talking shit?
If he's shooting in raw and using a third party program to edit, he needs to go back to using picture project or Nikon Capture, if he cant use photoshop for post processing.
I think he was talking about how you are giving constuctive crit. and she is talking shit.
Oh, maybe I misread then, my apologies.
wow the photographer sucks. Aside from what was already mentioned....look at the colors!! The background is def. not white. so quick and easy color correction would have fixed that. There is not enough contrast. The image is about twice the size it needs to be for that quality of resolution. I'm surprised he gets any buisness.
quick before and afer with color correction and things george pointed out:
^ Yeah big difference. Like I said I have no idea what he uses to process but the correction you did Alex makes a huge difference.
bwahahahah jason!!
you did fool! Re-read silly..."Then talking shit about a photographer other than constructive criticism as George is doing is a good way to never get work...something not even a boob job will fix."
george, re read that... unless you gettin a boob job... hes talking elsewheresilly kid
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
