Evolution or Creation?

[C22H19N3O4]

What theory of relativity or Law of physics did YOU come up with???? So you are regurgitating what you found in your google search that agreed with you. How'd that take any more effort than anything else?

So one needs to formulate his own theory, which takes funding and years of rigorous testing, to agree with the findings of another? Interesting concept. I'm sorry, which college did you do your research? That's the last personal attack I promise. . The fact that the only source of data for Creationists is the bible, IS not logical. Science can at least attempt to reference other sources. We don't have just ONE source to draw from.

Problem is that the only one you will give any merit to is the one that agrees with YOUR phylosophy. How convinient.

Hmm, sounds a lot like Creationism to me. Hard to believe but I am very open-mined. I am willing to consider any point as long as sufficient data exists.

How come you if you are so scientifically inclined do you not scientifically rebutt any of the examples Metalman has given in his previous post? He gave a handful of "scientific" examples that shoots holes the size of a Marta bus in your Evolution theory. Address those.

Metalman's examples have been discussed many times over. Read any Creationist website. I assume you've read those before you posted? It's the same argument. They use "unreliable" science to refute "unreliable" science. Makes no sense to me. Hey, if he wants to discuss coelacanths, newts, abiogenesis, evolution, theory of gravity, and etc that's fine by me. It just becomes a tiresome debate. It takes time to post detailed explanations regardless of which side you are on. BTW, are we talking about ABIOGENESIS or EVOLUTION?

Instead you wanna twist every argument back to: Medicine is scientific. Medicine helps cure people. Therefore Science is the only thing that ever works.

Apparently you didn't read the previous posts. No surprise there.

Therefore Science is the only thing that ever works .

Do you have evidence that suggests otherwise?

Why don't you start by trying to make some of the examples given above dissapear with your all knowing science?

Creationists are questioning established science, so the burden of proof is on their shoulders. Do you really think, given the history of this debate, anything would just disappear? Would you understand why Creationists lobby to eliminate the teaching of the Second Law of Thermodynamics? No matter the evidence provided, Creationists will dismiss it b/c it does not conform to their agenda.

Proof, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. You will never see proof with your eyes closed.

Why do YOU need proof if you have faith? Isn't faith in your heart and mind? Shouldn't matter whether your eyes are open or shut.

Not everyone that opposes Creationism is atheist/agnostic and not everyone that opposes Evolution is religious. Can they co-exist?