Quote Originally Posted by pharm_teg
The sites you linked don’t refute anything.
I read about it when it happened. I didn't have someone point it out and then try to refute it w/o knowledge of said material.
You read what a reporter - not a scientist put out. I gave you the links to the NASA report (with the quotations), and images of his notes. His own words - "That means ... we have the remarkable effect that an atom (in one BEC) plus an atom (in another BEC) gives no atom. It's destructive interference," says Ketterle. "Of course we didn't destroy matter, it just appeared somewhere else in the pattern, so the total number of atoms is conserved."
Like I said, you can believe anything you want, but I would suggest you go to the source of the statements, rather than posting what a reporter interpreted from it. Make your own decsisions though, no one else (including me), can or should be a big factor in your decision-making.