You obviously have not studied the scientists papers in question...and I would suggest you didnt study carefully the so called "refuted" evidence either. Nearly everything that is "refuted" by these scientists has already been addressed, even YEARS ago by the scientist in question. The scientists doing the refuting have been shown to largely be unfamilair with the evidence already presented in scientific journals and elsewhere. BUT....I wouldnt expect anyone who does a quick google search/cut/paste to know that.