Originally Posted by Hulud
God has no need for a pencil in Heaven.
In other words, WHO would write ANYTHING about God? There are only two choices: God himself or MEN. No other choices are they????
Every single religious document in every single religion was "written" by a man. Does that change the message? To people like you, obviously the answer is yes.
another back from the dead
people like me? LOLOLGod has no need for a pencil in Heaven.
In other words, WHO would write ANYTHING about God? There are only two choices: God himself or MEN. No other choices are they????
Every single religious document in every single religion was "written" by a man. Does that change the message? To people like you, obviously the answer is yes.
anyways to respond to your comment, the message might be the same but the details will always vary to favor how the person feels
Val for President
We are just past Easter, so I'm going to use a double pun.......
HOLY RESURRECTION BATMAN!!!!
People like you, as in Atheists.
The big argument about this was that the "Bible" was written by "man" THEREFORE it MUST be as fallable. MY point was that there are only 2 authors it could EVER be written by: GOD himself or Man. There is no other possibilities until Animals or plants can write. Right or wrong? So therefore, merely because "man" writes something doesn't automatically make it wrong. How many other things clearly written by our fellow man do we not teach others and use everyday as 100% correct? How many scientific THEORIES are taught as 100% correct everyday in schools and colleges, and theories by definition are more ideas than concrete proof??? I could go on and on.
Point is pretty clear; it is a cop out to simply dismiss the Bible BECAUSE it was written by mortals. The message is the reason for it, not who literally wrote it.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLWe are just past Easter, so I'm going to use a double pun.......
HOLY RESURRECTION BATMAN!!!!
i knew you meant that it was more of a joke along the lines of assumption but its all goodPeople like you, as in Atheists.
i dont simply dismiss the bible because it was written by man, im just saying that you and i both know that the bibel could have EASILY been tainted with because it was written by humansThe big argument about this was that the "Bible" was written by "man" THEREFORE it MUST be as fallable. MY point was that there are only 2 authors it could EVER be written by: GOD himself or Man. There is no other possibilities until Animals or plants can write. Right or wrong? So therefore, merely because "man" writes something doesn't automatically make it wrong. How many other things clearly written by our fellow man do we not teach others and use everyday as 100% correct? How many scientific THEORIES are taught as 100% correct everyday in schools and colleges, and theories by definition are more ideas than concrete proof??? I could go on and on.
Point is pretty clear; it is a cop out to simply dismiss the Bible BECAUSE it was written by mortals. The message is the reason for it, not who literally wrote it.
and i am not trying to shake anyones faith im just saying how i feel
Val for President
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote