Stance on incest? That's rather obvious isn't it? It's wrong.

Point out a passage in the Bible where it says it's not.

What you are getting at is that if both the stories are true, then incest happened then, right?

I'm not sure how the church explains that one, but I'm going to find out.

I'd venture to guess that it may be a combination of both a means to an end and evolution of the human races. Again, that's just a guess because I don't know for sure.

But remember that if we use the same logic and apply it to the Big Bang theorists, the idea would be the exact same. Cavemen would've had to commit the same incestual relations in order to procreate. What does that make yall's stance on incest then?