While i admire your passionate rebuttal and am genuinely happy that you put some effort in your response and presented a reasonable argument against person A, it went down hill after that.
You chose to observe person B's race, which was not mentioned. Person B represented "a cheap handgun" which is the most commonly used weapon in criminal activity. Assault rifles make up less than a 1/2 of a percent of crime statistics in america. Since the issue of race was presented to me, i feel inclined to respond. Black people are 13% of the population, yet they make up over half of the prison population and are the most predominant race present in criminal activity. Observing statistics makes a person observant, not racist.
Obama has already killed an innocent american with a drone. You can legally be killed by a drone without standing trial on american soil.
How Team Obama Justifies the Killing of a 16-Year-Old American - Conor Friedersdorf - The Atlantic
And lastly, to the one part of your argument that made sense...... person A: You cant have freedom without the freedom to do bad things. Once you begin removing freedom for the sake of safety, you are no longer free. "I prefer dangerous freedom to peaceful slavery" - Thomas Jefferson. Also, person A, assuming they are the sandy hook mother, was robbed and murdered. Guns stolen from her were then used in criminal activity. Sounds like she is one of the victims to me.





Reply With Quote