Quote Originally Posted by Ran
Any argument can be persuasive if written well. I've read my fair share of religious and anti-religious literature and they're always hit and miss. I might flip through it the next time I'm at the bookstore, but most of these types of books just spout off the same roundabout justification while throwing mud in as much of a non-offensive manner as possible.

Can you throw us anymore info on this one?
I'm not even halfway through it yet. With most anti-religious texts it deals with just negating any proof, but it goes more in depth than just criticizing the existence of God as a religious person would know. It deals more with the moral aspects and human nature. Another part of it I liked was criticizing the notion that religion can't be criticized, although his goal is clearly to convert people towards atheism it's very interesting regardless of your religious views. Dawkins is very interesting, his perspective is different from the average anti-religous man considering his educational background. I also like him because he recognizes the possibility that god does exist, he just mainly negates God in religous contexts. There is a chapter devoted why God "almost certainly" does not exist but it definitely isn't typical anti-religious rhetoric. It would be worth a try for you I'm sure, but this book probably speaks to me a lot more (no bad intentions from that) than it would to you. My views align with his pretty consistently so that probably makes my perspective a little biased.