If a GTO can't handle....*Stig kill story*

[Echonova]

WOW... I guess you forgot your "little 2 liter" is TURBO? Guess what happens when you turbo the 6.0.... 550whp+ to your 320whp.... If you're going to make a comparison do it right...

On another note...
Have you guys even looked at the numbers?

S2000 = 200whp, 150 ft lbs tq (@6500RPM), EPA 18MPG city 25MPG Highway 2800LBs
GTO = 330 whp, 330 ft lbs tq (@3500RPM), EPA 17MPG city 25MPG Highway 3800LBs

How's that? More power(+), more weight(-), damn near same MPG(+), and faster(+)... So much for that poor engineering, low efficiency bull ****. Looks like the advantages out weigh the disadvantages to me... Don't even make me get into the comfort/interior of the two....

Wasn't the GTO discontinued before they were required to list "realistic" MPG numbers???

[ILOVEKIDDRACING]

Wasn't the GTO discontinued before they were required to list "realistic" MPG numbers???

There's nothing unrealistic about it.. I average 19 in the city and over 27 on the highway.... but having a tune did help out the gas mileage as the motors run pig rich from the factory.

[AnthonyF]

There's nothing unrealistic about it.. I average 19 in the city and over 27 on the highway.... but having a tune did help out the gas mileage as the motors run pig rich from the factory.

:jerkit::jerkit::jerkit::jerkit: oh sh*t, I'm sorry. I didnt mean to get any in your eye.

-Ant.

[Echonova]

There's nothing unrealistic about it.. I average 19 in the city and over 27 on the highway.... but having a tune did help out the gas mileage as the motors run pig rich from the factory.

I average only 25 out of my 2.0 4-banger. But I'm far from stock ... and I only have 5 forward gears.