Results 1 to 40 of 276

Thread: If a GTO can't handle....*Stig kill story*

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I may be paranoid. VQ35 Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,661
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    i'de rather have a s2k than a gto.

  2. #2
    Powered by 4G63 willum14pb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,434
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VQ35 Star
    i'de rather have a s2k than a gto.
    I'd rather have a civic than a GTO. 6 liters producing like 330whp? ouch. :\ Talk about a bad tune. Can't be very good on gas either, bet it drives pump to pump.

  3. #3
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willum14pb
    I'd rather have a civic than a GTO. 6 liters producing like 330whp? ouch. :\ Talk about a bad tune. Can't be very good on gas either, bet it drives pump to pump.
    Why don't you try this GTO out?

    I get 18 in the City, 27-29 on the highway.


    My car made 334 rwhp bone stock... with a pig rich tune and it was down about 4-5 degrees of timing of where it should be. Intake + Exhaust + Tune got me up to 371 rwhp... not to mention it makes over 330 rwtq from 2500 rpm - 5500 rpm


    Dumbass import owners.

  4. #4
    IA's Slowest V6 Alan®'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,819
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    Why don't you try this GTO out?

    I get 18 in the City, 27-29 on the highway.


    My car made 334 rwhp bone stock... with a pig rich tune and it was down about 4-5 degrees of timing of where it should be. Intake + Exhaust + Tune got me up to 371 rwhp... not to mention it makes over 330 rwtq from 2500 rpm - 5500 rpm


    Dumbass import owners.
    Not to bash or anything but he does have somewhat of a point. The new V6 Eclipse's made 270ishp hp with a 3.8L V6. I still don't think that those are great numbers for that size of a motor but eh. Just food for thought.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan®
    Nah not even. theres not enough alcohol on the planet that would convince me to bang that chick.I wouldn't hit that with Magic Johnson's dick.....on second thought
    Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10

  5. #5
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redGT
    Not to bash or anything but he does have somewhat of a point. The new V6 Eclipse's made 270ishp hp with a 3.8L V6. I still don't think that those are great numbers for that size of a motor but eh. Just food for thought.



    It's got a tiny ass baby cam. Believe me they didn't WANT to go anywhere near all out. Simple proof of that is with a slightly bigger cam, and porting the heads you've got cars over 480 rwhp. That is about 580-600 hp at the motor, with a new cam and heads.

  6. #6
    IA's Slowest V6 Alan®'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,819
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS



    It's got a tiny ass baby cam. Believe me they didn't WANT to go anywhere near all out. Simple proof of that is with a slightly bigger cam, and porting the heads you've got cars over 480 rwhp. That is about 580-600 hp at the motor, with a new cam and heads.
    that is exactly my point
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan®
    Nah not even. theres not enough alcohol on the planet that would convince me to bang that chick.I wouldn't hit that with Magic Johnson's dick.....on second thought
    Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10

  7. #7
    Who is John Galt? Echonova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Age
    96
    Posts
    26,989
    Rep Power
    84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS

    It's got a tiny ass baby cam. Believe me they didn't WANT to go anywhere near all out. Simple proof of that is with a slightly bigger cam, and porting the heads you've got cars over 480 rwhp. That is about 580-600 hp at the motor, with a new cam and heads.
    Fascinating

  8. #8
    Turbo-Wired
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Cobb
    Age
    39
    Posts
    825
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    Why don't you try this GTO out?

    I get 18 in the City, 27-29 on the highway.


    My car made 334 rwhp bone stock... with a pig rich tune and it was down about 4-5 degrees of timing of where it should be. Intake + Exhaust + Tune got me up to 371 rwhp... not to mention it makes over 330 rwtq from 2500 rpm - 5500 rpm


    Dumbass import owners.
    An '00 S2K with 6psi can run in the 270whp range pretty reliably with nothing but the turbo. That's 135hp/liter. That's approximately 2.2 Times as much HP/liter as you get with your GTO. Your tune and timing change for my turbo, seems fair, and I still have a massive power per liter difference...from a Honda. I could do it bone stock and really make you feel dumb about the effiency of that LS2, but considering GM can't be bothered to even continue it's DOHC V8 line any more, there's no point in bashing pushrods.

    PS: You're right. Us import owners are dumb. You're one of the really dumb ones.

  9. #9
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaiser
    An '00 S2K with 6psi can run in the 270whp range pretty reliably with nothing but the turbo. That's 135hp/liter. That's approximately 2.2 Times as much HP/liter as you get with your GTO. Your tune and timing change for my turbo, seems fair, and I still have a massive power per liter difference...from a Honda. I could do it bone stock and really make you feel dumb about the effiency of that LS2, but considering GM can't be bothered to even continue it's DOHC V8 line any more, there's no point in bashing pushrods.

    PS: You're right. Us import owners are dumb. You're one of the really dumb ones.
    LOL. Here comes the HP / Litre comment.

  10. #10
    IA's Slowest V6 Alan®'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    36
    Posts
    12,819
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    LOL. Here comes the HP / Litre comment.
    And it's comments like this that really make me hate the scene some times. It's comments like this that keep the whole domestic vs. import dispute going. And while sometimes it can be fun and entertaining in this case it's just dumb and closed minded. The man made a perfectly legitemate claim that you simply can not refute with anything besides the usual LSX>VTEC . You have successfully just proved yourself to be a tool.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan®
    Nah not even. theres not enough alcohol on the planet that would convince me to bang that chick.I wouldn't hit that with Magic Johnson's dick.....on second thought
    Epic Foxbody Thread Crew Member #10

  11. #11
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redGT
    And it's comments like this that really make me hate the scene some times. It's comments like this that keep the whole domestic vs. import dispute going. And while sometimes it can be fun and entertaining in this case it's just dumb and closed minded. The man made a perfectly legitemate claim that you simply can not refute with anything besides the usual LSX>VTEC . You have successfully just proved yourself to be a tool.
    Since when did HP / Litre win ANY race?

    It is the dumbest argument, ever.

  12. #12
    Powered by 4G63 willum14pb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,434
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    Why don't you try this GTO out?

    I get 18 in the City, 27-29 on the highway.


    My car made 334 rwhp bone stock... with a pig rich tune and it was down about 4-5 degrees of timing of where it should be. Intake + Exhaust + Tune got me up to 371 rwhp... not to mention it makes over 330 rwtq from 2500 rpm - 5500 rpm


    Dumbass import owners.
    I think you've missed my point. With exhaust and a tune i made 320awhp and tq. With my little 2 liter.. Yet your 6 liter v8 struggles to get 330whp off the bat.. That's ****ing pathetic. Pontiac needs to learn how to tune a v8 from the factory or the size of that engine is beyond pointless. Why the 6 liters to make 330whp..? Ferrari uses a 4.3L V8 and hits around 450whp, But you're right... i guess i'm the dumb import owner that bought a car that out accelerates, out handles and out looks your heavy 6 liter V8 right off the showroom floor. Jackass. Take your fanboy ass to the a domestic site to reassure yourself of your retarded purchase.

    Look at me look at me, i can go in a straight line. Stfu. *****.
    Last edited by willum14pb; 07-05-2008 at 09:55 PM.

  13. #13
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willum14pb
    I think you've missed my point. With exhaust and a tune i made 320awhp and tq. With my little 2 liter.. Yet your 6 liter v8 struggles to get 330whp off the bat.. That's ****ing pathetic. Pontiac needs to learn how to tune a v8 from the factory or the size of that engine is beyond pointless. Why the 6 liters to make 330whp..? Ferrari uses a 4.3L V8 and hits around 450whp, But you're right... i guess i'm the dumb import owner that bought a car that out accelerates, out handles and out looks your heavy 6 liter V8 right off the showroom floor. Jackass. Take your fanboy ass to the a domestic site to reassure yourself of your retarded purchase.

    Look at me look at me, i can go in a straight line. Stfu. *****.
    you want to put that "out accelerate" to the test?

    I'd hate to drag that car down the street with you screaming out the window "but I make more hp per litreeeee!!!1111"

  14. #14
    JDM TYTE AnthonyF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Cumming
    Posts
    24,318
    Rep Power
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    you want to put that "out accelerate" to the test?

    I'd hate to drag that car down the street with you screaming out the window "but I make more hp per litreeeee!!!1111"
    Again. what is up with this "drag" I dont and never see any chains. I told you, you want to hook a chain up to your "race car", lemme know sweetie. Or...do you not want to get any dirt on that fine ride u own?

    -Ant.
    The Carbon Fibered R6

  15. #15
    Powered by 4G63 willum14pb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Dunwoody
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,434
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThackerSS
    you want to put that "out accelerate" to the test?

    I'd hate to drag that car down the street with you screaming out the window "but I make more hp per litreeeee!!!1111"
    I would beat you with my 3rd gear out as it is. You're crazy to think you'd take me on a launch, and even more crazy to think you'd take me on the highway. I've got higher horsepower/tq/all wheel drive so i stick instantly on the launch.. I dont know why you would even contest me. I'd have to launch from 2k rpm and miss a shift for you to have a chance.
    Last edited by willum14pb; 07-06-2008 at 12:31 AM.

  16. #16
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willum14pb
    I would beat you with my 3rd gear out as it is. You're crazy to think you'd take me on a launch, and even more crazy to think you'd take me on the highway.
    LOL. Then back up your ****ing mouth and lets get to it.

    You think AWD is the only thing that can hook?

  17. #17
    Slow... mp5o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    408
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,360
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willum14pb
    I think you've missed my point. With exhaust and a tune i made 320awhp and tq. With my little 2 liter.. Yet your 6 liter v8 struggles to get 330whp off the bat.. That's ****ing pathetic. Pontiac needs to learn how to tune a v8 from the factory or the size of that engine is beyond pointless. Why the 6 liters to make 330whp..? Ferrari uses a 4.3L V8 and hits around 450whp, But you're right... i guess i'm the dumb import owner that bought a car that out accelerates, out handles and out looks your heavy 6 liter V8 right off the showroom floor. Jackass. Take your fanboy ass to the a domestic site to reassure yourself of your retarded purchase.

    Look at me look at me, i can go in a straight line. Stfu. *****.

    WOW... I guess you forgot your "little 2 liter" is TURBO? Guess what happens when you turbo the 6.0.... 550whp+ to your 320whp.... If you're going to make a comparison do it right...

    On another note...
    Have you guys even looked at the numbers?

    S2000 = 200whp, 150 ft lbs tq (@6500RPM), EPA 18MPG city 25MPG Highway 2800LBs
    GTO = 330 whp, 330 ft lbs tq (@3500RPM), EPA 17MPG city 25MPG Highway 3800LBs

    How's that? More power(+), more weight(-), damn near same MPG(+), and faster(+)... So much for that poor engineering, low efficiency bull ****. Looks like the advantages out weigh the disadvantages to me... Don't even make me get into the comfort/interior of the two....

  18. #18
    Who is John Galt? Echonova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Earth
    Age
    96
    Posts
    26,989
    Rep Power
    84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mp5o
    WOW... I guess you forgot your "little 2 liter" is TURBO? Guess what happens when you turbo the 6.0.... 550whp+ to your 320whp.... If you're going to make a comparison do it right...

    On another note...
    Have you guys even looked at the numbers?

    S2000 = 200whp, 150 ft lbs tq (@6500RPM), EPA 18MPG city 25MPG Highway 2800LBs
    GTO = 330 whp, 330 ft lbs tq (@3500RPM), EPA 17MPG city 25MPG Highway 3800LBs

    How's that? More power(+), more weight(-), damn near same MPG(+), and faster(+)... So much for that poor engineering, low efficiency bull ****. Looks like the advantages out weigh the disadvantages to me... Don't even make me get into the comfort/interior of the two....
    Wasn't the GTO discontinued before they were required to list "realistic" MPG numbers???

  19. #19
    Banned ILOVEKIDDRACING's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Palmetto, GA
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,700
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Echonova
    Wasn't the GTO discontinued before they were required to list "realistic" MPG numbers???
    There's nothing unrealistic about it.. I average 19 in the city and over 27 on the highway.... but having a tune did help out the gas mileage as the motors run pig rich from the factory.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
ImportAtlanta is a community of gearheads and car enthusiasts. It does not matter what kind of car or bike you drive, IA is an open community for any gearhead. Whether you're looking for advice on a performance build or posting your wheels for sale, you're welcome here!
Announcement
Welcome back to ImportAtlanta. We are currently undergoing many changes, so please report any issues you encounter with the site using the 'Contact Us' button below. Thank you!