Quote Originally Posted by .blank cd View Post
What evidence is there, other than the current conjecture that keeps floating around, that this was a cover up? Obama had a mathematical advantage of winning before election season even started. Those people who would be interested in a fake scandal like this were not likely to vote for him anyways. If it was a cover up, his cover was blown in a matter of days, and he still won by a significant margin. And if it was a cover up, you would not know it was a cover up. The only person this hurts is Clinton's chances of election in 2016. And I doubt this will even have an effect that far out. No ones getting impeached. No one is gonna get canned other than the people that already quit.

Media circus. Grab your pitchforks, we're drumming up controversy. And part of me doesn't even think they're doing it on purpose. I believe some of them actually believe there's a controversy, and some just want to burn down the administration for whatever reason. With each subsequent circus attraction, GOP digs theirselves deeper and deeper into obscurity. Hopefully so much that a moderate faction emerges which pushes the democrats back left of right center.
Changed talking points.
Protests fabricated out of thin air.
Reported intimidation of State officials.
Lies from all over the administration.

Isnt the point of an investigation to find out what happened?


Wait, I thought you were a centrist? If that is true, why would you want to push the dems even further left than they already are? I guess a little bit of truth finally slipped out.

Quote Originally Posted by .blank cd View Post
Are they not allowed to have personal attorneys now?
Of course they are. But it is certainly possible they want personal ones because they are going to give testimony that contradicts senior State appointees.