Quote Originally Posted by .blank cd View Post
Its this right here is why it upsets me. It's perverse, its disgusting. Thinking that someone was trying to protect his election, despite there not being any evidence for it. It's called "politicization of the deaths of 4 individuals"
I actually kind of agree here, but there is actually more to it. IF Obama had simply called it a terrorist act on Day 1, when they didn't really know what it was (I'm sure that they had suspicions), and called for justice (visualize Jesse Jackson style here), then he could have exploited it politically with ease. The way he chose to address it gives the appearance to me that he was not really trying to exploit it in a political manner, and why I think that it is just an error, and shouldn't be a big deal in regards to how we look at him. It is definitely not a reason for impeachment, like some have called for.