Benghazi... After today's revalations...

[Vteckidd]

What do you mean futile? I've heard the video and read this already and even quoted from it and it backs up everything I've said. He did not specifically mean 9/11/01. So I guess in a sense, yes. It is futile.

Lol.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

Exercise critical thinking. The comments are about the 9/11 memorial services he participated in, and that he was equating soldiers dieing in war (caused by 9/11/01) with diplomats dieing. He then calls ACTS OF TERROR , but never SPECIFiCALLY calls Benghazi and "act of terror". Which, honestly im ok with. Then, for the next 4 weeks, he calls it a VIDEO PROTEST that was SPONTANEOUS. He gives a speech 2 weeks later calling the Benghazi attack the cause of a despicable video.

He NEVER EVER EVER calls it an act of terrorism specifically or even in the weeks afterwards.

So, SOMEONE LIED TO HIM, WHICH MADE HIM LIE (unknowingly) TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. How do you not see that? The Video had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ATTACK, THE VIDEO WAS RELEASED 6 MONTHS BEFORE THE ATTACK ON OUR EMBASSY.

THEN this comes out today
Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference - ABC News

OH LOOK ABC IS ACTUALLY REPORTING. ITS CLEAR HIlary and HIGHER are hiding something. The White House said only 1 word had been changed, now we find out its paragraphs 12 different times.

[David88vert]

Exercise critical thinking. The comments are about the 9/11 memorial services he participated in, and that he was equating soldiers dieing in war (caused by 9/11/01) with diplomats dieing. He then calls ACTS OF TERROR , but never SPECIFiCALLY calls Benghazi and "act of terror". Which, honestly im ok with. Then, for the next 4 weeks, he calls it a VIDEO PROTEST that was SPONTANEOUS. He gives a speech 2 weeks later calling the Benghazi attack the cause of a despicable video.

He NEVER EVER EVER calls it an act of terrorism specifically or even in the weeks afterwards.

So, SOMEONE LIED TO HIM, WHICH MADE HIM LIE (unknowingly) TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. How do you not see that? The Video had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ATTACK, THE VIDEO WAS RELEASED 6 MONTHS BEFORE THE ATTACK ON OUR EMBASSY.

THEN this comes out today
Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference - ABC News

OH LOOK ABC IS ACTUALLY REPORTING. ITS CLEAR HIlary and HIGHER are hiding something. The White House said only 1 word had been changed, now we find out its paragraphs 12 different times.

Can we agree that we do not believe that Obama changed the text/talking points in an effort to intentionally lie? If so, I think that we should simply acknowledge it as an error, and move on. Personally, I am ok with his Administration making a mistake, as long as they correct it, and go after the enemy. Hindsight is 20/20, during the days after the attack, it was not.

[Vteckidd]

Can we agree that we do not believe that Obama changed the text/talking points in an effort to intentionally lie? If so, I think that we should simply acknowledge it as an error, and move on. Personally, I am ok with his Administration making a mistake, as long as they correct it, and go after the enemy. Hindsight is 20/20, during the days after the attack, it was not.

I do not believe Obama lied or was in on the cover up. But his Administration is responsible. Ive always said that.

If Obama didnt lie, then someone high up in his admin lied. I believe the latter. Someone in the State Dept / CIA was trying to protect his re-election

[David88vert]

I do not believe Obama lied or was in on the cover up. But his Administration is responsible. Ive always said that.

If Obama didnt lie, then someone high up in his admin lied. I believe the latter. Someone in the State Dept / CIA was trying to protect his re-election

While that is possible, that should have no bearing on the support of the President in regards to finding the perpetrators of this attack.

[Vteckidd]

While that is possible, that should have no bearing on the support of the President in regards to finding the perpetrators of this attack.

Ive never said i dont support us getting the perpetrators? Ive seen no evidence that the Prez is committed to finding them though as we have probably long since lost the bad guys by now by over politicizing the issue.

[David88vert]

Ive never said i dont support us getting the perpetrators? Ive seen no evidence that the Prez is committed to finding them though as we have probably long since lost the bad guys by now by over politicizing the issue.

The President has not lost them, as he is not the one searching for them. The FBI, CIA, etc, has these tasks. Let them have some time to do their jobs.