This is so wrong but oh so right. A Twin Turbo Ford 302 swapped Camaro putting down 750hp's and doing 11.5 's on street tires.
![]()
This is so wrong but oh so right. A Twin Turbo Ford 302 swapped Camaro putting down 750hp's and doing 11.5 's on street tires.
![]()
N/A>>><<<BOOST
HOLY DEAR ****ING JESUS THATS BAD ASS AS I DONT KNOW WHAT TO SAY HOW MEAN THAT IS
damn that is nice as hell...
LIL WEAV
oh my **** !!!!!!!!!! thats beautiful !!
Oh they are SO going to Hell for that!!
Well, people have been swapping small block chevy's into Fords forever, so this is just car-ma hehehe
looks great though! I bet it's a wild ride!
I have to say thats the only '69 camaro that I like![]()
'93 5.0
Should've made a Boss 302 clone with that motor but that's still a badass car.
At least it still has a V8. Haha, I was expecting to see an sr20 or rb under the hood. That thing is sick.
sick car,id rather see a 454 under there........but nice swwap
should've built a dz 302, would've made a little less horsepower but would rev forever. and it still would've been a CHEVY!
That is the worse swap ever in my opinion. Why do you want to put a ford motor in a chevy. But other than that its a nice/clean car.
"Damn, Its Tyler"RaceReadyDevelopments
confused, but different
someone call Websters, we have found a new defenition for badass.
To piss off and both Ford and Chevy heads.Originally Posted by prelude4life
You think Mopar had something to do with this? lolOriginally Posted by koukis14
"Damn, Its Tyler"RaceReadyDevelopments
now thats a nice camaro!all these 96's u see rollin all over the import scene, now thats one id like to see stop by!
nice pics
~DB4LYFE
07 Honda GD3
american muscle!
big motor heavy car... if the motor was in a musting all it would do was spin the tires off
wtf??? A small block chevy outpowers a small block ford any day. Why the hell would someone go through the trouble of swapping a ford engine into a chevy, unless they already had the engine???
Land Rover LR3 HSE
I've seen plenty of Mustangs with that kind of power hook just fine, its all about how you build it.Originally Posted by BITCHING
"Damn, Its Tyler"RaceReadyDevelopments
Yeah.......... on street tires. Pretty damn good if you ask me. Car looks good. Motor I dont understand. Could have made more with less money with a LS1 motor.Originally Posted by ironchef
actually thats not really that good...Originally Posted by SLOWR/T
A few years back me and my dad built a 2nd gen Trans Am with a heavy ass pontiac 400. It had around 700hp (N/A, no spray) and ran high 10's on nitto street tires.
I mean ****, there's videos all over youtube of stock C6 Z06's running mid 11's on street tires, and high 10's on slicks. Hell there's even a guy with proof that he ran 10.981 on stock goodyear eagle F1 run-flat street tires.
I'm just saying, he would have been better off to stuff a build Gen 3 GM small block under the hood, or even a built older gen 1/2 sb.
Land Rover LR3 HSE
You know how the drag's are. Sometimes 10 second cars just wont hook up. Sometime's 11 second cars hook right and run faster than expected. It's not always a HP issue. It could be heavy or something. Running a higher rear end ratio for the street, stuff like that.
Are you sure it's still displacing 302ci? If they went through all this trouble.. why not a stroker?
Are you sure it's not 351 based?
Originally Posted by MSRTom
This is what I came up with.
Vehicle weight with driver: 3,600 lbs
Best ET: 11.6 at 127 mph (with street tires)
ENGINE Type: 302ci Ford (4.140 bore x 2.830 stroke) Block: Ford Motorsports Windsor R302 Compression ratio: 9.7:1 Oiling: Canton dry sump, Raceline three-stage pump Rotating assembly: Sonny Bryant 2.830-inch stroke crank, Carrillo H-beam rods, and CP 9.7:1 forged pistons Cylinder heads: AFR 185 aluminum, CHE Precision, Inc. NASCAR valveguides and seats, 7-angle valve job, Teflon-coated intake ports, ceramic-coated exhaust ports and combustion chambers, custom-built and flowed by Wegner Automotive Camshaft: COMP (35-306-8) solid-lifter roller tappet, 224/230 degrees duration at .050-inch, .566/.578-inch lift, Pete Jackson geardrive Valvetrain: T&D Machine 1.70:1 shaft-mounted roller rocker arms, Wegner titanium 2.02-inch intake/steel 1.60-inch exhaust valves, hardened 3/8-inch pushrods, valvesprings, and CHE titanium retainers Induction: Edelbrock Air-Gap manifold, DFI Gen VII EFI, 75-lb/hr injectors, dual K&N Xtreme air cleaners Power adder: twin Incon 800TTi turbochargers, 12-psi boost, external wastegates fabbed by Innovative Turbo, radiator and intercooler custom-built by Ron Davis Ignition: Mallory Hyfire distributor, 6AL box, Crane Fireball PS92, 22 degrees total timing (under boost) Exhaust: Incon cast-iron turbo stands, custom-made side pipes and 3-inch muffler inserts by DeRaad Fasteners: ARP Built by: **** Landy Industries, Northridge, CA DRIVETRAIN Transmission: G-Force-built Tremec T56 (2.48, 1.99, 1.35, 1.00, 0.83, 0.63:1), McLeod Twin Disc pressure plate assembly, MGW shifter Driveshaft: Inland Empire aluminum, 4-inch diameter, Strange 1350 yoke Rear axle: narrowed Currie 9-inch, 31-spline axle shafts, Truetrac screw-type differential, 3.70:1 ring-and-pinion CHASSIS Front suspension: modified Martz Chassis clip and custom spindles, Griggs Racing springs, QA1 adjustable shock absorbers, Detroit Speed frame connectors, antisway bar Rear suspension: Griggs five-link and springs, Watts link fabbed into chassis, torque arm, custom lower control arms, QA1 adjustable shock absorbers Brakes: Wilwood SL6 13-inch disc, front; Wilwood 12-inch disc (with internal parking brake), rear WHEELS & TIRES Wheels: Fikse Profil 5S 18x10, front; 18x12.5, rear Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 275/35ZR18, front; 335/30ZR18, rear
N/A>>><<<BOOST
This is soo true. If that person twin turbo'd a small block chevy he would prob be over 900hp if not 1000.Originally Posted by allmotoronly
thats whats up. I love it!
3.70 rear huh? That may knock a little time off right there compared to a 4.10
I bet it would be nasty with slicks.
with a 4.10 you would run out of gear too fast with that much hp. a 3.73 would probably be the gear ratio of choice. Without going into overdrive, with a 4.10 rear end that car would probably top out around 130mph or so. It really depends on the height of the rear tires as well as the final drive ratio. Most drag cars, even if equipped with overdrive will not use it since any ratio under 1.00 causes a loss in efficiency.Originally Posted by LordZed
Land Rover LR3 HSE
Well spoken sir. I see your point. I guess I'm used to powerglide tranny's and tall ass tiresOriginally Posted by allmotoronly
![]()
I bet it would be fun as hell ont the street. Probably doesn't handle all that bad either (in muscle car terms)
Well, we Mopar-ites have been know for bring the badassness out of many-a-vehicle!Originally Posted by prelude4life
I'm loving this car. If I ever see it in person I'm going to get it pregnant so it would never leave me![]()
Originally Posted by RUFFIAN
thats a million dollar car lol.....its nice but way to much money for those et's i like the look but damn. i would have done a 454 roller motor and a big roots blower and bitchin suspension and a flat black paint job and ran 9's all day long on slicks.but good job on the orgionality. i like it but damn that car sucked up some serious cash.
yes i am....
dear god that thing is gorgous
~fap fap fap fap fap~ pause ~fap fap fap fap fap~.
Hell all the trouble they went through, why not go with the 572? Either way, that car is sick nasty beautiful. I would make sweet, ohhhhhhhh so, sweet love to it.
2013 Dart 1.4T 6MT
boooooostin'
i love ford
With the weight of the car a 3.08 gear would work fine. My 5000 lb brick has a 3.42 gear in the back and tall tires. Turbos love load.Originally Posted by allmotoronly
Silverado rcsb ls1, 4" in and out diesel muffler,