their has been 3k US deaths in the war
Printable View
their has been 3k US deaths in the war
Your logic is cloudy buddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by richw131
Think of it as killing every single murder, rapist, drug dealer, etc.
I just think a much more diplomatic approach could have been taken by the government to prevent war. WE WERE THE AGRESSORS.
IF SADAM HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT WE SURE AS HELL FUCKED UP ON THE TIMING.
you were born in 1987, I was born in 1980 do the math how are you three years older than me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo
Where are your facts/details that show Bush fitting any of the definition of a villian.Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
~awaits facts~
I found atlanta 521's mug shot
http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j3...sin1/osama.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
sounds like a good plan to me,id vote for the pres that did that
my bad, lol im going blind..i thought it said december 1989:goodjob: :doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
I wouldn't necessarily call Bush a hero but a Villain? I'm sure it depends on who you ask, I wish he was as adamant about dealing with domestic issues than pushing democracy across the world. The irony of it is that the U.S itself is not a true democracy.
Saddam.. this will piss some of you off but I do not think he was a direct threat to the U.S and there are a lot of politics in what happened to him. Should he have suffered for what he did? Yes.. but I'm not 100% on whether it was our responsibility.
props to him for helping keep world population in check? :lmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
sounds like a plan to me...otherwise, we spend more money for them to sit and get 3 hots and a cot...fuck that...eye for an eye and this world would be better off:goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo
lol,same thing i said
An Eye For An Eye Makes The Whole World Blind. Ghandi FTWQuote:
Originally Posted by Steveo
Although i disagree with you, atleast you presented it in a respectable manner:goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by tony
Oh well..so be itQuote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
My logic stands just fine. Re-read.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
Were we? What about the attack on Kuwait? What about ignoring the sactions by the UN? You may want to think about that statement a little more. :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
Well, we should not have stopped short of getting Saddam back in the early '90's. I have always thought that to be a BIG mistake. Had we continued until he was gone, there are a lot of things that would have been better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
yep,we shouldnt havent cut and ran in desert storm
agreed, 100%. but going back in before afghanistan was taken care of was a HUGE fucking mistake. one that we're still paying for now and the ppl of iraq and afghanistan are also paying for.Quote:
Originally Posted by richw131
The middle east has always been a big pile of shit. Had we left it alone we wouldn't be sitting in shit now would we? Maybe they'd flick some shit at us from afar but a bit of shit is better than a lot of shit.
its cool, I like debating about issues. All of yall some cool people though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo
and gas would be $10 a gallonQuote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
i can tell u one thing,we would be in worse shape right now if kerry was preident
That's when I say fuck wild life and drill Alaska and make peace with Venezuela. God knows Latin America needs the $ more than the middle east.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo
I completely agree with you Tony and you know that rarely happens. Sadam should have suffered without a doubt, but that wasnt our problem to solve, the U.N. should have dealt with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tony
now I do agree with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
:rolleyes: There is so much stupidity here, I will not waste my time disecting it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
The UN would still be trying to figure out what to do. :goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
You have absolutely no clue about this and it seems many other subjects.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
Since when does HUNDREDS of THOSANDS of people that Saddam has killed compare to the 3300 or so U.S. casualties??? Obviously our public school math programs need a lot of work if that's your logic.
Saddam has been clawing his way up the ranks since he nothing but a worthless street thug in the 50's and 60's. Do you even know that he murdered THOUSANDS of people? Do you not know that he was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death for only 148 of those? Do you even know that he TAUGHT his sons the acts of torture, rape, and murder when they were pre-teens?
You sir are a very misinformed and immature youth that needs to learn how to think for yourself and do your own research. Here, I'll help you get started: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein
Read a little bit of that. Read a lot more that is out there. Quit listening to whatever misinformed people you are listening to because they have no clue what reality is as neither do you.
:lmfao: Thank you, Captain Obvious!Quote:
Originally Posted by HypnoToad
lol j/p
I agree 100%
and when we say the people sadam killed were talking bout men women and kids,that were raped and tortued to death....not being shot in battle
That's better than where we're at now. It's not like Sadam was going to start slaughtering hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and launching nuclear missles.Quote:
Originally Posted by richw131
*lets not forget the civilian causalties in Iraq..
which is why we had to go do everything:goodjob:Quote:
Originally Posted by richw131
Jaime with yet another excellent post
and what exactly ARE we doing? things aren't any better since we've arrived there and we have no good plan on how to get the fuck out....sitting and deciding what to do w/o having sunk in a shit ton of money and lives doesn't seem so bad at all if u ask me
You are still lost. Saddam is dead. That is better than him being alive and able to kill more people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
My point is this war is nothing but loss-loss..
The Sunnis and shi'ites will fight till the death after we leave.
No doubt Saddam is the biggest Villain.
Bush started a war on a lie and with no real plan, and now we are stuck there just trying to keep Iraq from going completely into chaos. Now Iraq is a bigger threat to us than when Saddam was in power. Is Bush a awful president? Yes, but even his stupidity cant even come close to the horrors Saddam has committed.
also,the guys i know in the special forces,told me that the Iraq people love the americans and want them to stay and help them rebuild the country..they dont want them out
A couple of things to remember when it comes to Iraq and Saddam:Quote:
Originally Posted by WHAT_LAG
The Reagan administration aided Iraq with $40 Billion during the Iran-Iraq conflict. Iran could have taken care of this supposed problem before Desert Storm, strange that we now see Iran as a threat.
People like to think George Sr. and George W. are similar but when it came to the conflict in Iraq they could not be any more different. During Desert Storm we went in working multilaterally with other countries, the objective was to keep Iraq out of Kuwait.. not go after Saddam so those who complain about not getting the job done the first time, blame Sr for not going out on a limb.
lol, but at least w/saddam alive, ppl KNEW who was out to get them and kill them. now they don't have the slightest fucking clue, it could be any fuckhead extremist suicide bomber hitting up markets, schools, police stations...Quote:
Originally Posted by richw131
nothing new there, just like how the US used to give funds and equipment to afghan "freedom fighters" when they were combating the russians...Quote:
Originally Posted by tony
You are a moron of infinite proportions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta_521
Exactly how "far" is NY? Where did the 9/11 terrorists COME FROM, genius? Middle East, right? So how can you even remotely say that they would only "flick shit from AFAR" when they came HERE to kill THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE?
You are a true blue Democrat. You would have us pacify and sit on our hands while they plot to come over, yet again, and kill thousands more all in the name of "world peace"..... :rolleyes: Sounds more like a canned beauty pageant answer to me than a solution.
The U.N. sat and did nothing, the rest of the world sat and did nothing, what RESULTS did that net us? NOTHING. He did what he damn well pleased and told every damn person he could that's EXACTLY what he was doing. That's part of why Saddam was so popular to Arabs was BECAUSE he "stood up" to the big bad Westerners. So just like any other ego maniac, he played right into that by proclaiming his own intentions and turning them around to be a "Holy war" against the West who is trying to take away our religion and peaceful way of being...... :blah: :blah: :blah: ....HITLER used the exact same propaganda to help his own cause too.
You have no clue what you are talking about. Go back and read the link I gave you in my last post, maybe you'll learn something finally. :rolleyes: