
Originally Posted by
David88vert
I will make this simple, so that you may have a chance to understand it. A gutted out racecar is not a reasonable comparison to a fully functional, daily driveable street car.
A 911 is a street car. A Corvette is a street car. An Outlaw 10.5 is not a street car.
The 997 GT2 RS is the only 911 to be faster than the current ZR1 - and that is a limited production, carbon-fiber, custom-tire, $245k car. Compare a stock $110K 911 to a stock $110 ZR1 - that is apples to apples.
Any car can be made fast or nice with enough money. That said, after taking a Civic/Mustang/240/Corvette/911/etc and spending $200K on it, you will still have a Civic/Mustang/240/Corvette/911/etc - not a Veyron, or a car worth $200K+.
I have never said anything about your vehicle before this thread. You seem to have a poor memory.
Now, to put it all "in context", look at your thread (the one that said find a car like mine for under $8K), where you stated that the car had to be comparable to your car, and you would pay out $50. Every car that anyone showed, you had a problem with - not enough power, not nice enough, "wrong" bumper cover, etc. It was all about the quality of the car, the power of the car, and the value of the car. You wante to compare apples to apples there, but in this thread, you don't want to limit yourself to apples, you want to bring oranges into it to try to bolster your poorly conceived argument. Are you able to understand what you are doing now?