just wanna see how i do against one. i gotta 91 awd tsi talon with goodies![]()
or anyone that lives around douglasville that wants to run just let me know.
just wanna see how i do against one. i gotta 91 awd tsi talon with goodies![]()
or anyone that lives around douglasville that wants to run just let me know.
A stock TSI can take a stock 5.0 im sure from experience riding in both
The fox is heavy...
Tsi 2549lbs
5.0 2834lbs
I would run you but you are to far for me, if you ever go to the barrett meets LMK..... What HP are you looking to run? What Hp are you at?
-If You Own A Honda And Say "Headers", Go Jump Off Bridge...........
Ive got a friend with one doing 7.8's in the 1/4, is that too fast or you talking slightly modded 13 second one? Broad spectrum here.
Gave it everything it had...5.0's have tons of torque...that is what they are known for. So their take-off is mean. 350Z/G35's lack in torque...they suck on take off. Now, if we started on a 40-50 roll...I would get him. I have raced 2 2005+ (1 was a 2008) Mustang GT's from a 40 roll and we were dead even up to about 120 and I pulled on him and continued to pull until I hit my max of 160. On take-off, those same Mustang's would beat me.
depending on the year, a stock 5.0 GT, if it has the h/o motor is a high 14 sec car. a newer GT(4.6 3v) runs high 13s. so either your G is a turd or your buddies car isnt stock. i find it very hard to believe that a stock 5.0 gt, with either a 2.73 or 3.31 gear can spin the tires all the way to 40mph.
My b.s flag is raised.
edit- i saw that you posted its a 89. with that being said, my buddy had a 91 fox with FRPP heads, 4.30 gear, all your favorite bolt ons, and slicks and only went 8.6s in the 1/8th mile. they do make some good torque but they are by no means, ungodly.
Ive seen lots of stock 5.0's get wheel spin to easily and im sure it can happen to 40mph if you push the motor.
My brother has a 85 with HO and it is a bitch to launch with no wheel spin till 3rd.
Another of my brothers just got a 90 5.0 today im curious in seeing its pull.
well i guess the G is a turd then lol, i mean they are heavy cars so they wont have much take off. especially with the torque they make, but i still dont see a stock 5.0 outrunning it if he was spinning THAT bad. the guy needs to learn how to peddle it lol.
the reason people love the 5.0s is becuase they are stout motors that have a HUGE aftermarket. you put a nice cam, gear and a good set of heads on one and you have a pretty fricken quick car.
If 5.0's make "ungodly torque" what do you call LT1's and LS1's? The LT1 is stock rated at 325-340 ft/lbs... lol
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
lt1s are pretty nice on the bottle. off the bottle they wont fall out of a tree. lsx motors are a different story lol
LS1's are rated at those numbers not LT1's, LT1's made the best of 285HP in the later 96 & 97 years before was like 250-265HP.... And 350z/G35's are slow/heavy IMO, I used to spank those in my SRT-PT(PT Cruiser W/SRT-4 motor) along with mustangs, but at least GT's would usually give me a run for my money.....
-If You Own A Honda And Say "Headers", Go Jump Off Bridge...........
modded 12-13 second stang doesnt really have to be a 5.0
if you want to drive to rome, ill play around.
Mine with a K&N CAI, Edelbrock 50 state legal shorties, true duals, and street tires went 13.1 @ 104.5... not bad IMO. Not to mention the tune was off because the tuner said he couldn't get the car to run on his tune.
I didn't say anything about horsepower. Y'all were talking about the torque of a 5.0 being beastly, when the torque of a LT1 is even better.
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
'92 C2500 6.5 Turbo Diesel | '96 240sx
nice man, thats damn impressive for an LT1
Ive got a low 13 second 3 valve GT you can run.