Quote Originally Posted by admin
you keep trying to put words in my mouth that i disagree that man came from nothing, i stated the cycle starts w/ creation, but you are trying to complicate the fact tha evolution exsist. i don't give a shit if its adaptation, macro, micro, its still evolution at work... you can call an apple an orange but its still and apple.
Yes indeed what you described can be called "evolution" but not in the larger sense in terms of what "science" tends to teach and mankind tends to accept.

Here's the issue that I was discussing....frogs come from frogs, whether it require a single frog or two is beside the point. Evolution in its largest sense the theory that the first frog came from nothing OR another lifeform.
That theory HAS NO PROOF, on the contrary, the proof would indicate instant creation by intellligent design, ORIGIN of life by creation of a God or super intelligent being far surpasing anything known in humans.

Somewhere along the line I guess you mistook the objection I have to this ultimate theory of evolution, which is the very heart and soul of it, for something else.

I glad you concur that LIFE started by creation, that is certainly what makes the most sense to me given the evidence. I might add...so far the evidence does not contradict the Bible account of creation. In particular the fossil record is in complete harmony with that account.