Have you carefully read my answers in this forum??Originally Posted by admin
I have already acknowledged THAT type of "evolution". Its the "man came from monkeys, which came from NOTHING" which I dispute. There is NO PROOF for that type in terms of ORIGIN OF MAN. There is NOT ONE example of ANY specie ever becoming another. There is no fern becoming a frog.
You confuse micro-evolution (adaptation, crossbreeding etc)with macro-evolution (orgins of life from nothing) There is no doubt frogs make frogs, people make people, sheep make sheep, elephants make elephants etc etc etc.....in addition we know that crossbreeding of many specie is possible. (MULES etc) We also know that if you put a man in the desert for centuries he will develop darker skin and larger nostrils BUT he will never become a scorpion!
However, to jump from THAT to a theory that maintains man came from NOTHING, remember... "The rolex from empty box theory" is a leap of immense faith based on NO PROOF.
In fact the fossil proof indicates life SUDDENLY appeared. NOT gradually.![]()




you got to be kidding me... of course a frog, how do you think the cycle of life works, how do you think you were made?

Reply With Quote